similar to: Keeping state for multiple default routes

I''m trying to get the hashing filters set up for about 1k IP addresses. I went through the list archives and read the howto. I did find a couple non-functional samples. Does anyone have a shell/perl script that would at least generate the basic rules for 256k, 512k, etc, and then attach the ip range to it? dave -- Dave Weis djweis@internetsolver.com http://www.internetsolver.com/

Hello everyone. I've stumbled upon a strange networking issue with multiple interfaces on CentOS 5. The network setup is just like the diagram in http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html It looks like linux is not routing correctly outgoing packets on interfaces different from the one of the default gateway, but instead broadcasts an ARP request on the link, looking for the

I''m trying to shape each machine on an interface to 256k each, but I''m getting stuck and only able to shape an entire interface to 256k. What should I be doing differently here? tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100MBit ceil 100MBit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 110:

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | | x eth1 (63.43.x.x)

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches /w support for multipath routing Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | |

Hi. The task: 1. There 3 servers and a router with 2 PPPoE connections (let call them: ppp0, ppp1). 2. There are several groups of Inet-clients to be served (Servers, Clients and Club). 3. The task is: - to route Club through the ppp1; - to Servers and Clients through ppp0; (Next is reproduced from memory and may be slightly incorrect) router # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table

Hello, I have tested a simple thing in two version of Linux and there was a problem when I have used fwmark as a selector for rule lookups. As you can see below on the Slack, the <test> table doesn''t have any label about fwmark. Is there an iproute problem? -------------------------------------- # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) # uname -r 2.6.5-1.358 #

hi, Im tryig to use two isp links get worked: first isp 212.122.xx.254 (gw) second isp 10.10.xx.2 (gw) my ip1 212.122.xx.90 (eth0) my ip2 10.10.xx.254 (eth1) internal network my ip 192.168.1.254 (eth2) turn on masquerading on both links: $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to 212.122.xx.90 $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to 10.10.xx.2 mark packets on 6667

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello there, > > What is the hypervisor that hosts the VM? What does ifconfig show on it? > > Boris. > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 11/06/2016 11:00 PM, Sean Son wrote: > > > >> How do I

Etx1 - First Internet Line - eth0 Ext2 - Second Internet line - eth2 LAN - Local Area Network - eth1 Other traffic - Ext1 -------+-------+--------------- Ext2 ---Web goes Here eth0 | |eth2 +-------+-------+ | ROUTER | +----+------+---+ |eth1 192.168.0.0/24 -----------------+ | 192.168.0.1/24------------------- - Gateway |

I am running kernel 2.6.5, gentoo linux...julian''s routes-2.6.4-10 installed eth0 = local eth1 = cable modem eth2 = T1 I am having issues with the machine actually sending packets out over each hop, it tends to default to eth2, almost never will it use eth1- I can make a rule to send traffic through the eth1 from certain hosts, and it will force the IP through that interface, but

Hi, I have a Linux machine with kernel 2.6 and 3 network cards. I would like to ask what rules should I have in the routing table so that: 192.168.254.0/25 is routed through eth1 192.168.254.128/25 is routed through eth2 eth0 is my internal interface and eth1/eth2 are the external interfaces. * What is particulary specific for this case is that ipaddr_eth1 is in the same network as ipaddr_eth2

Hi all, I need to route local generated packages depending on which tcp or udp service I need to use. To accomplish this I have configured two routing tables: [root at lothlorien ~]# ip ru ls 0: from all lookup 255 32762: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup FirstLan 32763: from all fwmark 0x1 lookup SecondLan 32764: from 172.25.80.10 lookup SecondLan 32765: from 172.25.70.18 lookup FirstLan

Hi All, I have a linux router, configured with two internet connections and two lan segments. I''ve setup multipath routing as described in http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html My problem (I think) is that somehow the router will randomly choose incorrect routing paths for different hosts, for example: on my workstation (192.168.1.20), I ssh to a server I have on an

Hello guys, I am still in doubt about this kind of server. So my question is about the "prio" at routing tables like: I have 3 tables in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 201 201 202 202 222 222 In table 201 there is the rules about my internet link (frame relay) that comes into eth0. So I made this route into it: [root@ns2 iproute2]# ip route show table 201 default via

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I''ve setup some routing tables, but how can I delete them? currently it looks like that, but how I delete the tables stuebi and notebook and how the entry in the main table. thx for your help. Babylon5:~# ip rule ls 0: from all lookup local 32759: from 10.149.19.168 lookup stuebi 32760: from 10.149.17.72 lookup stuebi 32761:

Hi!, I''m getting nuts with this so I really need your help... I have a network in the 192.168.100.0/24 class C with the gw in 192.168.100.1, all the company works great with that scenario but now we need to add more class C networks, now this is what I have: 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:08:a1:53:6d:51 brd

Hi, I am new in LARTC list. I had intermediate skills in networking. What I tried to do: Use 2 links with loadsharing + falt toletant (to add bandwitdh) ok ! I am use Debian Etch in router/fw With kernel debian default + routes-2.6.17-12.diff patch The Problem: The iproute2 just route thought the last gateway of nexthop rule. I was running tcpdump in 2 terminals, tcpdump -nni eth0 ...

Hi, This is the first time I write to the list. My english is not so good, but I hope I''ll be understood. I have 4 adsl routers, plugged on a linux box, and this box e used to connect to a local network. The linux box has 5 NICs. eth0: local network inet 10.0.0.56/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global eth0 eth1: adsl router 1 inet 192.168.254.1/24 brd 192.168.254.255 scope global

A number of weeks ago I had huge help from many of you configuring routing on a server with multiple Internet facing nics. Thanks for all of your help!!!! I am still having a routing issue that I am hoping someone can help me tweek. This server, besides acting as our gateway to the internet, is also our web and email server. The server has 4 nics. Two are connected to the internet and the