similar to: RE: [Havp-users] problems installing from source

Hi, I want to use Havp Version 0.86 with SQUID on CENTOS 4.4 and 5. But, no Havp 0.86 RPM still can not be found. I want to build Havp 0.86 RPM and SRPM by using the tarball. So, I got havp.spec file written for Havp 0.82 and changed its version to Version: 0.86 . Then, I did below command. [root at worldnet SPECS]# rpmbuild -ta havp.spec error: Name field must be present in package: (main

Hi all, HAVP 0.85 has been released and also added support for ClamAV 0.90 library. But there is still no rpm available for HAVP 0.85. Dag has HAVP 0.82. (havp-0.82-1.el4.test.i386.rpm<http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/havp/havp-0.82-1.el4.test.i386.rpm>) . Does it support ClamAV 0.90 library ? Can I make a RPM out of current version of Havp Version 0.85 ? If so, How can do it? --

Hi, I have this message in my syslog: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. I don''t know why it''s there. I think all my setup is right. I am shaping traffic from my web server. It lives at three IP addresses, first is fast (and most important - aaa.bbb.ccc.1), second slower (aaa.bbb.ccc.2), third slowest (aaa.bbb.ccc.3). Total bandwidth is 2700kBps. Other

Hi all, I''m trying to set up traffic shaping and I''m having some difficulty. Here is what I want, and where I am. 1. HTTP and SMTP traffic needs to be priority 1. 2. All other traffic priority 2 3. Torrent traffic priority 3. My distro is Fedora Core 4, and the torrent protocol does not appear in /etc/protocols. The only protocol is TCP, which HTTP and SMTP is built on top

I am having a problem that I really just don''t get.... I have this in my rules file: DNAT net loc:192.168.1.2 tcp 21 21 Everything worked fine earlier today.. Now it is dropping packets destined for Port 21 /var/log/messages: Dec 14 00:36:39 pcp08479598pcs kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0b:6a:3f:e6:72:00:01:5c:22:92:42:08:00 SRC=24.210.36.92 DST=68.57.216.61

Hi there, I''ve read Routing on One Interface, and Shorewall and Aliased Interfaces docs but I''m a little confused, and all my test attempts have mostly failed. Here is my setup: CentOS 4.2 ShoreWall 3.0.2 My server has a subnet 192.168.50.0/29 routed to it via 192.168.1.2. Currently 192.168.1.2 is setup on eth0. With no ShoreWall involved routing seems to work if I just setup

>> Hello, >> >> I am using Debian Sarge, with Shorewall 2.2.3, >> >> for access control I am using hosts.allow : >> >> ALL: 144.131.xxx.xxx >> >> and hosts.deny: >> >> ALL: ALL >> >> I have a virtual machine that is being port forwarded to with Shorewall : >> >> DNAT net loc:10.0.0.100 tcp 3389

Good morning, We''ve been testing PE and beginning developing modules for our infrastructure. One of the modules I''m looking to create is an installation for Splunk, with the primary focus at this time, on the Forwarder. I already have the splunkforwarder-5.0.1-143156-linux-2.6-amd64.deb package being fetched from the Master and also performing the installation via dpkg. I

Hello, I've used oggenc with these options before: $ oggenc -q3.0 -m 96 -M 225 somemusic.wav But it's now encoding everything at 1.0kbps. The compression is *awesome* but the found quality is somewhat lacking. Has something changed recently, or am on crack (again)? Cheers, Geoff Ps. I put the above example in the ifp-driver mailing list FAQ.. but now I don't look so smart..

My firewall is using shorewall 3.0.x and CentOS Recently, I found that firewall is attaching from ARP spoofing.. There are a lot of "out of socket memory" in messages log ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and

Dear shorewall list enthusiasts, I recently set up a dedicated linux box running shorewall in order to isolate my network from the "evil other side" :) It works so well that I first have to thank and congratulate everybody that took part in this project ! Then, I have a question, that separates my setup from "wonderful" to "heaven" : I activated the

Hi, I am one of the developers of the FreeWRT project and I want to give you some feedback. Shorewall runs quite fine on our supported devices, but we need to patch Shorewall to get it running as expected. The problem is the ip command and busybox 1.4.2. Some words about busybox: BusyBox is a multi-call binary that combines many common Unix utilities into a single executable.

Hi Shorewall Users :) I have found shorewall firewall and seems to be interesting. I need to setup a configuration my my network users because i only have 50gb of traffic per month. I want to know if the shorewall can make a 48gb per month limit, but everyday from 1:30 PM do 8:30 AM (happy hour ) the traffic doesnt count. Can shorewall do that ? -- Sem Mais Rui Oliveira 351 - Portugal

Hi. What system or software are you using to show the iptables log files (for example the dropped packages tagged as LOG in the Shorewall rules)? Thank you very much! Bye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files

hello Tom >Another very likely cause is that Shorewall-shell is generating a pkttype >test to identify multicast packets. This can be unreliable and can be >avoided by setting PKTTYPE=No in shorewall.conf. After using PKTTYPE=No in shorewall.conf , my syslog is clean now. Do you mean that adding the following line in /etc/shorewall/interfaces is suffiscient? dmz eth1

I set up a firewall following: http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html Using shorewall 4.0.5 and a 2.6.22 kernel Attached a dump from shorewall. It''s setup for testing. I have an internal host set to it as the default route. The ipsec.conf file is renamed to keep it from messing up the vpns. Most things are working OK. I''m a bit concerned that all the outgoing nat traffic is

I remember to see something about that in shorewall.net some time ago, but I could not find it today ... The case : Debian Etch, Shorewall 3.2.6, squid3 and Apache 2 . The first 3 where already running fine for some time ... Now I need to setup an Apache server to allow some web mannagement, things like PHPsysinfo, phppgadmin, just for internal net, no web access . but port 80 is redirected to

Hello, I recently installed a newer version of OpenSSL on my system and decided to get the latest of OpenSSH as well. I installed OpenSSL 0.9.8k without any difficulty. When I tried to install OpenSSH, however, I got this message: checking OpenSSL header version... 9080bf (OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009) checking OpenSSL library version... 90701f (OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003) checking whether

This mail goes mainly to Tom, as he sent some Laptop configurations files to the list. I checked the files you had sent to the list as answer to [Shorewall-users] Shorewall on a laptop Now - Is there a specific reason why you actually lock/blacklist the following ports ? - udp 1024:1033,1434 - tcp 57,1433,1434,2401,2745,3127,3306,3410,4899,5554,6101,8081,9898 These should IMHO be blocked by

Hi, I have the following problem while activating this rule entry using shorewall-shell: ACCEPT:notice:rul WAN:139.x.x.226 INT:139.x.x.153-139.x.x.156 udp 1024:65535 1024:65535 "-m iprange" in front of "--dst-range" is missing in the activation command. The logging entry (above) is set correct. Below is the debug output. Thanks Regards Günter + case $level in +