similar to: trouble with traffic shaping HTB

hi there, is there any possible way to control traffic in child??? class with selected protocols for example http i try to use this script but its now working in theory: there is root class 1:0 with subclass 1:2 in class 1:2 all ip adresses have their bandwidth limit 1:{iden} and now i try also control bandwith in this class i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit i want 95kbit with burst to 190kbit

hi there, is there any possible way to control traffic in child??? class with selected protocols for example http i try to use this script but its now working in theory: there is root class 1:0 with subclass 1:2 in class 1:2 all ip adresses have their bandwidth limit 1:{iden} and now i try also control bandwith in this class i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit i want 95kbit with burst to 190kbit

Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de> > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 9, Issue 3 > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Message-ID: <200511021507.43661.Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" > > On Wednesday 02 November 2005 14:59, szogunek wrote: >> i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit >> i want 95kbit with

Hi there, We''re running a small ISP and all the users are shaped to 384/512/768k both ways (whichever package they choose). The router is a linux (debian sarge), the kernel is 2.4.25 right now. All users are getting 10.1.1.* ip addresses (eth1) and eth0 connects to the isp using ethernet (via a media converter, it''s fiber from there). They''re nat''s using

I''ve been following the HOWTO, and reading mailing list discussions about throttling bandwidth, and have had some success, but I just want to tie off some loose ends. Essentially what I am wanting to do is to keep our bandwidth usage below 1megabit, because if we go over we get charged for that traffic. I''ve used some of the examples from the HOWTO to limit our bandwidth, but I

Hi, I''m trying to modify the Wondershaper script so achieve the following. 1. Prioritize traffic to the few IP addresses. 2. Everyone else should get a fair amount of bandwidth The problem I am facing is when I run this script is that the bandwidth seems to get halved. I tried to apply this script to a site where the upstream and downstream were fully saturated. I immediately saw

Hello. I have a 1024/256kbit ADSL and tried to shape outgoing traffic in order to improve latency. Here is my config. UPLOAD_RATE="256" UPRATE="$[4*$UPLOAD_RATE/5]" (a little smaller) UP70="$[7*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP30="$[3*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP20="$[2*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UPRATE="${UPRATE}kbit" IF="eth2" IPTABLES="iptables -t

Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in

I''m trying to build a QoS system that would divide the outgoing traffic into four categories, each one also subdivided into two more categories. For that I chose a htb root qdisc subdivided into four classes, each of these classes contains also a htb qdisc. Until these point everything goes well, but when I try to attach a new class to the leaf htb qdisc a problem with the sintaxis

Hi I''m actually using a wondershaper derived script. The problem I have is that when I ping (ping is in high priority queue) the ping time is not as low as I expected with p2p running: 760 packets transmitted, 760 received, 0% packet loss, time 759695ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.667/62.863/598.539/33.287 ms, pipe 2 With voip, it is much better with the qos but it is still a little

hi all i want to first apollogiaze if my message will annoy you(my guess is because it will be quite large:)) i have the following situation on my hands i was recently faced with the problem of traffic shaping/bandwith limiting. my setup is(very common i guess) -internet comming in(going out) through eth0 -internet is being "shared" with the private local network via eth1. i

Greetings, My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I understand it, there are 3 classes: 1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit 1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit 1:30 - bulk/default low priority

I''m using a fairly large number of classes, andf borrowing is not working as expected... I''ve called this setting it up on an IMQ device with speed 1200/256 on a 1536/384 line. I''m then throwing a UDP data transfer at it that gets tossed in one of the class under parent 1:6. The classification is working fine, but when I try to ping out, ping times are in the 900ms

(list admin, please cancel the same post from my other email address -- forgot to change it on first submission) I need to setup QoS on a linux router/firewall I maintain. I spent 10 hours reading everything I could find on QoS/HTB/iproute2 and came up with what I thought made sense for my situation. So I deployed it and BOOM! KERNEL PANIC! Not what I was expecting... now the debugging begins.

Will the following rules work to mark and shape OUTBOUND ftp speed (passive ftp ports 50000-60000) on my linux server? I want to be able to run these commands on the actual computer that is running the ftp server. iptables -t mangle -N MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:60000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc

----- Original Message ----- From: Michał Joachimiak To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: HTB - Really Big problem Hello everybody! Since week i dig lists and www and can''t find solution for my problem. I''m using HTB 3.13 kernel 2-4-25 smp iptables 1.2.9. I''ve got situation like this: LAN------Linux Box(routing only)------- Linux

Hi, My home setup is as following: - 1024/128 kbit ADSL - FC3 I set up HTB to prioritize traffic. I am not very pleased with the obtained results. The scope of my setup is to have some ssh sessions with remote servers while browsing websites and running aMule Nothing complicated (I think... ;). The very high priority traffic (ssh), gets stuck when I start aMule and make an FTP download.

Hello, i have a server (486sx and 16ram). It gives me this error : NETDEVICE WATCHDOG eth1 : ...timeout. I checked in many places for solutions. Even wrote to this mailinglist. But lately i recived information, that too much upload may mix my adsl modem up. So..... my question is how should my script look while the situation is : eth0 - connected to adsl modem and thus to internet eth1 -

Hi! I recently changed my qdisc from CBQ and PRIO to only HTB, and I can''t really seem to get the rates to work as I want them to. I have eight classes, which I set up as follows: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 122 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 1000kbit cburst 1500 burst 50kb tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb prio 0

> > In other words: Class B''s rate should always be x times the _current_ rate > > of class A. Ceiling rates should apply nevertheless though. > > > > e.g.: Class A: rate 500 kbit, ceil 2000 kbit > > Class B: rate 0.25 * (current rate of class A), ceil 1000 kbit > You can only do this with external scripting. There are two possible