similar to: LiteSpeed Web Server 2.2 with Ruby Rails integration....

Hi, If you have been using or evaluating LiteSpeed web server + Ruby LSAPI setup for Rails application, please make sure your are using the latest release, Ruby LSAPI 1.9 and LSWS 2.2.2. We have been fixing a few bugs that causes DB connection errors, incompatibilities with WEBrick/Mongrel and ruby process management issues, currently, all bug reported has been addressed in timely manner and

Hi, This message might be helpful for people who is using or plan to use LiteSpeed web server together with Rails. We posted two tutorials in our WIKI regarding Rails + LiteSpeed configuration. One is Rails + LiteSpeed API, another one is mongrel + LiteSpeed proxy. http://www.litespeedtech.com/community/wiki/doku.php?id=litespeed_wiki:ruby_rails

Hi, For those who are waiting for our tutorial on LiteSpeed + Capistrano deployment in a Rails App cluster, please take a look at http://www.litespeedtech.com/support/wiki/doku.php?id=litespeed_wiki:capistrano Basically, you need to setup sudo permissions and add sudo "#{lsws_cmd} restart" to deploy.rb of your Rails application. Best Regards, George Wang

In May I had problem with mongrels suddenly consuming huge cpu resources for a minute or two and then returning to normal (load average spikes up to 3.8and then back down to a regular 0.2 over the course of 5 minutes, then again 1/2 hour later. or 4 hours later, no predictable rhythm). I posted to Litespeed forums because I thought the problem was there but didn''t get far. And a week

Apologies in advance if this ignites a war of comflicting opinions.... I''m a few days away from going live with my first RoR application. It is completely database centric and each user will have his own queries so cacheing will not really help. I have a dedicated linux server being built by my hosting provider and I need to tell them which webserver to use. The databse is MySQL

I''ve heard good things about Litespeed but all the documentation I''ve found doesn''t reflect the new 3.3 version. The older 2 and 1 versions are just so different. I''ve gone down the road with the old docs and it''s always a dead end. I''d be happy to pay or trade code or some kind of programming favors for some help in this area. I''ve

Hi, First, my thanks to Zed for including LiteSpeed in cgi.rb vulnerability report. Appreciated! I just got time to review ruby-lsapi code and test the vulnerability against LiteSpeed. I found that, in our latest ruby-lsapi release 1.11, lsapi_read() function returns Qnil when the end of request body has been reached. So, in theory, LiteSpeed should not be vulnerable to this attack. Our test

Yo Zed, Just curious -- what do you think of the LiteSpeed server? Is it better than Lighty? Does it (gasp!) also serve Rails apps like Mongrel? I think I read that LiteSpeed doesn''t have proxying support. Thanks, Joe __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

How do I debug Litespeed Server on Mac OS 10.5 with GDB? I haven''t a clue on how to proceed. I haven''t used GDB before. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Happy RailsDay! While everyone else was out having fun with RailsDay I spent my time wisely and wrote up tons of documentation for Mongrel and cleaned out some of the docs I''ll never write anyway. I also took the time to apply some nice patches from Jonas Pfenniger for easily setting up redirects in Mongrel. Some of the highlighted documents people will be interested in are: *

Hi, I am glad to announce that Ruby LSAPI extension 1.4 is released, in this release we mainly addressed two issues, one is that a worker process does not remain persistent if a request has been canceled in the middle, this is addressed in 1.4. Another one is that process manager may create a lot more worker processes than the value configured when there were too many canceled requests, which

Hi, We released Ruby LSAPI extension 1.5 to address a bug introduced in 1.4 that may cause small post requests blocking. If you are using LiteSpeed + Ruby LSAPI, please upgrade. Best Regards, -- George Wang LiteSpeed Web Server http://www.litespeedtech.com/

Hi Folks, We''re moving from a single lighttpd-hosted Rails box to a Apache/ mongrel cluster. In lighttpd, mod_compress had a very nice feature: if there''s a static file, it would compress it in a user-specified compress folder. If the file hasn''t changed, it would just serve out the compress file; if the file has changed, it would recompress it and serve it out.

Hi, We released Ruby LSAPI 1.6 today to address a issue that some ruby processes can only be terminated with SIGKILL (-9). This is due to conflicts in signal handler between LSAPI and ruby. Upgrade is highly recommended for existing user of Ruby LSAPI + LiteSpeed. Best Regards, -- George Wang http://www.litespeedtech.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this

Hi! Searched a long time for this, but haven''t found an answer. I''m trying to make the user download a special file, no matter what mediatype it is (could be jpg, pdf or doc for example). My code right now is this: def download_path( _id = params[:id]) result = Philestructure.find( _id ) headers[''X-LiteSpeed-Location''] = "/downloads/

When using file upload with Safari and Litespeed server it often get stuck and it looks like it''s loading but nothing happens. What could be wrong? Firefox is better. Also IE 7. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To

I''d like to implement output compression in Mongrel (ala Apache''s mod_deflate). I have found a Rails plugin that, with minor modification, works. Is there even an advantage to moving the output compression from the Rails app to a Mongrel handler? Unless, of course, someone knows how to configure mod_proxy_balancer with mod_deflate... == Will Green Web Developer & IT

This GemPlugin will gzip your HTTP responses from mongrel if the client says that it supports it (eg, most modern browsers). I''ve tested it in IE6, Firefox 1.5 and Firefox 2.0RC3 Install: gem install gzip_filter --source http://edenli.com Configure (assuming rails): cd RAILS_ROOT echo ''uri "/", :handler => plugin("/handlers/gzipfilter")''

I know that Mongrel is a web server that hosts rails applications. But i don''t understand what part Lighttpd (or Apache) has in the setup. I know that you can use Mongrel on its own. What does Lighttpd improve on? Thanks, Chris -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: new_notes Type: application/octet-stream Size: 5801 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060723/34e20e45/new_notes.obj