similar to: Routing through a Point to Point link

Hi I am the author of /etc/net project (http://etcnet.org/), which along with other features provides QoS support. This support is done through a hierarchical configuration tree for each interface, which is translated into ''tc'' command sequence. Filters are supported and for each filter parent is determined automatically during translation: it is the last qdisc seen in the tree.

my target is to produce a linux router with T100p to Fract T1 24chan to ethernet and TDM 4channel FXO. I have not been able to get nethdlc to work, just get zaptel networking not configured if I set bchan and dchan the card comes to life, but I don't believe this is correct for what I want to accomplish. according to markster@ this is the way they do it. using (multiple distro versions

Hello All, I am battling a problem I don't know how to fix... Here is the scenario: Fractionated T1 with 1-6 channels voice, 21-24 channels data. Comes into a box with Digium T100P, splits off data channes with HDLC, to devicec pvc0, This works fine, but I have a routing problem getting to my machines! Here is the current set up... sethdlc hdlc0 fr lmi ansi sethdlc hdlc0 create 44

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.

Hello all, My set up is a fractionated t1, with 1-6 voice channels, 21-24 data channels. I have a t100P installed in a amd 1500 with 512meg. Question: In order to set up the data channels, is the following correct? 1) compile new kernel with generic hdlc support 2) compile hdlc from hq.pm.waw.pl/hdlc 3) uncomment KFLAGS+=DConfig_ZAPATA_NET in zaptel makefile 4) compile zaptel, 5 compile rest

I got it figured out now. In case anyone else comes across it - this is what I had to do: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 up ***NO IP INFO SET*** Sethdlc hdlc0 create <dlci number> Ifconfig pvc0 <local ip> pointopoint <remote ip> up Then set your default gateway to the <remote ip> listed in pvc0. That's about it!! Hope it helps! -----Original

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

All, I'm having a heck of a time getting hdlc to work on kernel 2.6.11.9 .. I compiled hdlc, hdlc_gen, hdlc_cisco, hdlc_raw, into the kernel (note into, and not 'modules'). System comes up, I configured zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-24 modprobe wct4xxp ztcfg sethdlc hdlc0 cisco ifconfig hdlc0 up All of this works fine, believe it or not. I have a T1 cross plugged

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

I have my Linux 2.6 kernel with the necessary HDLC config and also recompiled zaptel accordingly. On modprobe, I get: Found a Wildcard: Digium Wildcard T100P T1/PRI Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2000 in_atomic():0[expected: 0], irqs_disabled():1 [<0211e605>] __might_sleep+0x82/0x8c [<02144643>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d/0x57 [<42ad7a2c>]

All, I am trying to configure hdlc support on T100P Digium card - everything seems ok... but it just does not work at all. I was able to compile all drivers, the light on the card becomes green when I plug T1 link.... but I even can't ping default router IP... there is no data coming back to me, so I am confused completely now. Also I tried both protocols - raw hdlc and cisco hdlc. The

Hello all, We have a TE405P set up with span 1 running to a channel bank, a PRI running into span 2, and a PPP internet T1 running into span 3. We have the first 2 spans up and running without a problem. We have hdlc compiled into the kernel and after making the appropriate changes to zaptel.conf and loading the zaptel, wct4xxp, and hldc modules we can bring up the third span with the internet

Hello Routing Gurus ;-) I''d like to know if it''s possible to make a routing decision for pakets originating from a specific port of the local machine without using ipfilter/iptables to mark the pakets. I read about the tc filter stuff but that seems only to be able to sort the pakets to a different queue on the same interface and not choose a different interface for example. Is

Hello, I have configured advanced routing with success using three (03) network adapters ( ETH0, ETH1 and ETH2). Now I have to configure an addittion range in the same Interface ETH0 ( another internet ip range address ), so I would like to have TWO different ranges at the same ETHERNET CARD ( in this case ETH0 ) AND having advanced routing running it. I Did the same

I am attempting to deploy a TE210P with one port configured (all 24 channels) as Cisco HDLC, currently running 2.6.11 FC4 with HDLC module compiled. HDLC (RAW) appears to work fine, however, using Cisco HDLC (via sethdlc & sethdlc-new) results in no traffic being encapsulated or transmitted via the hdlc0 interface. Is there anybody here currently running a similar configuration on a

Hey gang, I was successful in recompiling my 2.4.20 kernel to support HDLC. I was successful in hooking up our T1 line into the zap card. I was successful in being able to ping equipment on the other end of the T1. I was unsuccessful in pinging the outside world from the other end of the T1. I've attached a cheezy image of the network. Here is the routing table: [root@asterisk root]# route

Hi I''m trying to understand this qdisc stats output: #tc -s qdisc ls dev [interface] [..] qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 13 direct_packets_stat 38 Sent 3867654734 bytes 7023775 pkt (dropped 4, overlimits 4852340 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 11p requeues 0 [..] In all my qdiscs, I''ve got "rate 0bit". What does it mean ? As you can see, there is some traffic

Hi all: I have this network diagram:<?view=page&name=gp&ver=3403410b768567d8#> FRAME RELAY CLOUD<------------>CISCO-ROUTER <-------LAN------->ROUTER-LINUX<---------LAN------------>>> Between the CISCO and the LINUX routers there is a small LAN (+-5 IP''s). My question is, if I QOS the traffic on the LINUX-ROUTER going out from the LAN towards the

Hello, After reading the excellent HOWTO I got traffic shaping working nicely over ethernet devices on a test setup. I can''t put this setup live though, because our main firewall has three 2mbit hdlc interfaces instead of a single device. We are using multipath routing using iproute2 nexthop at the moment, and that works fine for firewalling. But now I have a need for shaping and

Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or vice versa) in iptables? I''m getting ready to implement some basic tc for VoIP and most of the examples seem to use the (older?) fwmark syntax. Should I convert these to CLASSIFY? Can the two syntaxes be mixed? Also with U32? TIA, Edwin -- <=+=+=+==+=+=+==+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=> Edwin Whitelaw, P.E. New River