similar to: PPPoe, Bgp

Hi I''m setting up shaping using HTB and hashkey. It seems like there is a limit on the number of classid''s at 10000? How can I go higher than 10000? This is what my output say when I reach classid number 10000: ... ... /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:6 classid 2:9998 htb prio 5 rate 768kbit ceil 768kbit burst 0 cburst 0 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:9998 handle

Hello! I have trouble with multipath routing. Those options are enabled in kernel: [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) <*> MULTIPATH: round robin algorithm But issuing: ip r a 1.2.3.0/23 scope global equalize nexthop via 80.245.176.11 \ dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0

Hello! I was always using "default" in HTB to choose default class, but now I need to do it with filters. Tried following command: # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 2 flowid 10:2 Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "10:2" is unparsable It is from example in LARTC Howto. My question is then - how to make a filter matching all without eating

Hello! I am using since yesterday ESFQ instead of N HTB queues. It mostly works OK, but when somebody is using one single sesion (for example downloading file via FTP), it gets weird speed. For example it is 20 kilobytes pres second, then drops down to 9, then 20 again, and then slowly to 0 and stops. But when using download accelererator of some kind or bittorrent client which uses many

Hi I have read various info, and mailing list archives, but have not found an answer to the following. I have a few servers with configurations similar to the following: They each have multiple uplinks to the Internet, and a sample config is as follows: eth1 is 192.168.0.1, connected to 192.168.0.2 eth2 is 192.168.1.1, connected to 192.168.1.2 My default route looks like: ip route add scope

Hello! Currently I am marking packets with IPMARK, and then using following rules: 1: class add dev eth0 parent 1:4 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil $ceil quantum 1600 2: qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:100a handle 100a:0 sfq perturb 10 3: filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 pref 30 handle 4106 fw classid 1:100a 4: class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil $ceil

Hello! I think 36th line of ipt_MARK which is (*pskb)->nfcache |= NFC_ALTERED; Should be removed. At least looking at that patch: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2005-July/020382.html -- Michał Margula, alchemyx@uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ "W życiu piękne są tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel]

Hello, I've been using R under win XP and I am now changing my system to opensuse 10.2 When using: rpm -i R-base-2.4.1-2.1.i586.rpm I find something like that error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/R/library/tcltk/exec/util.tc ;45b943fe: cpio: read failed - Bad file descriptor Any suggestions? Regards Eugen

Hi, I have successfully shape bandwidth using htb.init using ip address , but when i try to shape zebra BGP using their ip address and BGP port it can''t match the class for BGP and always get the default class. Here''s my htb.init script in the bridge : #eth0-2:50.bgp RATE=128kbit RULE=192.168.192.163 RULE=192.168.199.22 RULE=*:179 #eth1-2:50.bgp RATE=128kbit

Hi, I plan to implement a redundant Internet connection using BGP on 2 different Linux Routers. The routing daemon software I will be using is Zebra (zebra.org). I''m wondering if I should have my Linux firewall behind the 2 BGP routers, or could I keep the shorewall on both BGP routers? Has anyone had any experience with this? Any help is much appreciated. Thanks, Sam

Hi list, My network was assigned a private AS and my ISP(4) urged me to use BGP ! My Other 3 providers on my Shorewall BOX are typical aDSL lines while the 4th is an 1G optical uplink with 64 addresses. Currently I am in a balance, track mode in shorewall ISP setup.. After I installed - configured and started zebra + bgp my static routing tables got filled with about 850 static routes to

Hi - I am trying to find a Linux based solution for one of my clients, I want to bond two adsl lines into one, with redundancy (if one fails the other does all the work). I''ve been looking into ECMP (Equal Cost Multipath), I know BGP would work, but something like ECMP would be much simpler. I have full control of both ends of the connections and I can have both ADSL lines terminate in

Hi Tinc group, I have recently got an adsl connection at home, which only provides a single static ip address. I want to set up a tinc vpn from home to my workplace. I am trying to decide what hardware I need to do the above. At the moment, I am aware that I could use an Alcatel Speedtouch USB modem directly connected to a Linux vpn box at my home. ( Wall socket---adsl cable---Speedtouch---usb

hi all, first i wann to explain my network & it''s problem, i am using a redhat el5 for multigateway routing, i have 3 adsl lines which is connected with eth0, eth2 and eth3. eth1 is my local network. those 3 lines comes with adsl modem from same isp with equal bandwidth (512 Kbps). In this adsl modems there is one lan and one wan port, adsl modem''s lan ip is gateway for my

Does anybody has experience with the SIP phone of Alcatel the ST280. I can't make a call with this phone. Everytime I make a call I get the error Jun 12 19:38:38 WARNING[1133718080]: chan_sip.c:497 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call 5624@81.124.191.47 for seqno 1 (Response)

Our users are experiencing some unacceptable delay when trying to have a conversation. The delay is so noticeable that they keep stepping on each others words and resort to calling the customers via cell phone. Here is the setup SDSL Connection (PPPoA) Speedtouch 610 SDSL Modem 3Com 2224PWR Plus Switch (phones on separate VLAN) 8 Cisco 796 Phones All connecting to a remote Asterisk Server. We

hi there, I saw a page on voip-info about the thomson ST2030 phone. There is not so much info on there, that's why I would like to raise a question here. Has anyone got hands-on experience with this phone? (with or without extension module) I am interested if it can be used (as SIP phone) in a good way with asterisk. (also, do all the functions behave like they should; like Supervision

Peter Jakobi wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > you already tested an ancient userspace-only rp-pppoe? > I''ve still one active, and trying this you could validate > your the rest of your setup, before looking at possible > kernel changes anew (strace, ltrace, logs, whatever)... > Hi Peter. No I did not. Do I have to compile it? Can you give me more info what to do?

I have sent a Polycom IP500 phone to an overseas remote user who has a Speedtouch adsl modem/router. The phone is connected to the 4 port router which performs NAT for the network. The phone rboots, find the server, downloads it's config and tried to register. Then it immediately becomes UNREACHABLE. Jul 26 17:44:41 NOTICE[21026]: chan_sip.c:9138 handle_request_register: Registration from

>> No I am using the EN5861, just that we have two ADSL lines and only >> one >> EN5861 and rather than buying another I''d like to use linux to do the >> same job as the en5861, if you know what I mean. > >You can, but since you have two ADSL lines, you''ll need two ADSL devices of some kind, whether it''s a pair of 5861s, or a 5861 and an