similar to: iproute2, alternative tables, no default route: routing trouble for localhost

Hi Here is a short description of my network: ppp0 (adsl) ppp1 (adsl) | | | | --------------------- | Router | | Firewall | | MASQUERAD | | DNAT | | | | eth0 | --------------------- | | | ---------------------- |

Dear all, I am working on a linux box (2.4.22 kernel) which is used as a bridge. And I want to add traffic control rules on it by client''s MAC. Does anyone has such experience on how to do that? Thank you very much!! Best regards, Henry _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi Ppl I have 5 adsl lines that after reading quite a bit i managed to get load balanced now abvoiusly it doesnt load balance evenly and this works on what routes are still in the routing cache. my question is my outbound masquerading had to be modified to use snat in iptables instead of just plain masquerading my outbound masquerading now works but my inbound port forwarding doesnt work would

Which kernel supports the iptables'' -m dstlimit? Do I need a patch or something else to get it to work? Is it too experimental? -- Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua>

Hi. I have strange troubles with DNATing UDP packets. The situation: 1. We have local network 10.10.0.0/16 2. We have a "server network" 192.168.1.0/25 connected with local network by a router 10.10.100.1 (other ip 192.168.1.1). 3. Web server is located at 192.168.1.2 4. There are HW pingers in the net 10.10.0.0/16 whose do ping 10.10.100.1 every second. The ping is the UDP packet

Hi. I have a Server''s network with some servers in it, all with 192.168.1.0/25 ips. There is also a router in that network with ip 192.168.1.1. This router also connected to a client''s network 10.10.0.0/16 with ip 10.10.100.1. All services on each server are given their virtual address from one of two virtual networks 192.168.1.128/28 and 192.168.1.144/28. 192.168.1.128/28 is

Hello everyone, really not sure if this is a LARTC question or not, but I have several hundred users all MASQ''d behind a single static IP. Users are reporting that certain websites are blacklisting that single static external IP for various reasons. What I would like to do is use several external IP''s and have a MASQ''d user getting a random one each time. Here is

Hello All, I was curious to know if I can do traffic shaping on abonded Interface? Ex: I have to interfaces eth1 and eth2 which i have bonded together as bond0 , now the question is can I do shaping on eth1 and eth2 ?? Thanks KartheeK --------------------------------- Here''s a new way to find what you''re looking for - Yahoo! Answers Send FREE SMS to your

I need basic PPPoE startup help. adsl-start DID bring up my PPPoE link (ppp0) to my ISP over eth0 via the DSL modem/bridge. My IPv4 CIDR block is routing and Shorewall is doing the firewalling. But shorewall has to be started after ppp0 is up and working. For now this means running shorewall restart (or start?). Shorewall 4.2 will have a way to restart shorewall without recompiling, I

I have two adsl lines on my linux firewall box and i want to do some load balance between them...i tried a lot of different things, but it isn´t working...Following the instructions of http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html i used the configuration above. using "iptraf" I can see some few packets using the ppp1 connection, but almost all the packets use ppp0 connection.

Hello Shorewall list, I''m a happy Shorewall user since a few years now and everything works fine for me except one thing that I try to implement since a week, the multi-isp. I''ve downloaded the 2.4.0 Stable release yesterday and tried the RC2 since a week. My config is a Debian running a kernel 2.4.27 home made with the CONNMARK.diff patch applied I''m using 2 ISP,

Hi All! I need to deploy a bridge firewall using linux kernel 2.6. I had success using kernel 2.4 plus br-nf patch. But the configuration does not work with kernel 2.6. If the default policy for the iptables FORWARD chain is ACCEPT I have a bridge. If iptables FORWARD chain is DROP I have an insulator (no packet flows). Any hint? I did some google search and in many places they say "kernel

i''ve read your http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html article as well as Advanced IP Routing (esp. chapter 10.4) and still unable to make this thing work. am i that helpless? :) is there anyone to guide me through the multiple ISP setup? into details. i got 2 dsl connections from different ISPs (A and B), both connections use PPPoE, both got assigned with dynamic IPs

Hi All, I''m trying to do some traffic shaping on an ethernet bridge. Currently, I have the following setup working: ifconfig eth0 down brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl stp br0 off ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig br0 up This creates a bridge consisting of eth0 and eth1. So far so good. I now want to use tc to shape traffic

Hi, I currently connect to my ISP via my adsl modem in bridge mode and PPPoE. I am due to put a second PPPoE ISP onto my firewall box which will give me ppp0 (general) and ppp1 (static leased line). The static leased line will run a number of services on its static IP and it is therefore imperative to make sure rules defined for the static line are assigned to the correct interface. I need this to

Hello all, We have two ADSL lines configured on a single box, hence interfaces ppp0 & ppp1. Is there a way to route packets to ppp0, say based on destination port 80 & other traffic like voice through ppp1? Thanks.

Hi, Thanks for the reply. Thats where the problem starts. If I set ppp0 as the default gw the internet doesnt work anymore. This is how im doing it... route del default route add default gw 217.32.81.74 dev ppp0 if I put it back to ppp1... route del default route add default gw 217.32.68.73 dev ppp1 It works fine again. Whats up with that? Cheers, Chris ----- Original Message

Hi, I have established two connections to the same ISP. After that ip route list showed this: 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.141.207 195.14.247.94 dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.237.84 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 default via 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 I want 192.168.0.2 to connect to the internet by ppp1 and all

Hi, I''ve set up a Linux box with redhat on to act as an internet gateway and I''m running into a few problems. Its got two adsl modems connected to it, both connected to seperate 512kbs lines. Now I''ve followed the simple source routing in the advanced routing howto to the letter but it doesnt work. I''ve got it autoconnecting on startup and redhat puts ppp1

Hi ! Recently i switched my internet provider, to get more speed but another braindead setup regarding public ip addresses. I now have 4 PPTP Tunnel available, of which i''m using one as the gateway ip doing masquerading to other machines in my local lan, excluding three other machines, which i would like to use 1:1 nat to get them a direct access to one of the pptp tunnels. I was