similar to: HTB and BOND Interface

Hi, I've using linux bonding in active-backup mode to combine two pairs of GigE NICs (eth0/eth1, eth2/eth3) into two logical bonds (bond0/bond1). All is working fine. However, I would like to specify a primary interface for each bond. This means I need to specify different options to the bonding module for each bond. I have tried every conceivable incantation of options and cannot get the

Hai, That bond0 interface, you might want to change that the interface name to bond1 Depending on the bonding settings, you might have hit a reserved name. I lots my docu on that but i know i configured a bond1 because bond0 didn work right. And then check these. wbinfo -pPt ( or wbinfo -p && wbinfo -P && wbinfo -t ) wbinfo --sids-to-unix-ids S-1-22-2-10513 wbinfo -D

Hi All I have two bond interfaces namely, bond0 and bond1. bond0 has two ethernet interfaces associated with it and bond1 also has two ethernet interfaces associated with it. Now i create a bridge interface namely br20 (20 being the VLAN) and assign it a IP Address , subnet mask and the default gateway. I will use this IP to reach the server. So it is like a management bridge for me.

Hi all, Someone played with kickstart bonding with centos 6.4 ? CentOS 6.4, as upstream now support ifcae bonding in kickstart network section. I've an issue with configuring a second bonding iface in kicstart on CentOS 6.4. The first bonding (bond0) works as espected but the second is not configured during installation. I've a 6 nic server (two for "puclic" network, two for

Hi all, I'm trying to setup a cluster of 2 machines with Centos 5.2 to host a postfix+spamassassin+clamav+mailscanner service. Below cluster software versions rgmanager.i386 2.0.38-2.el5_2.1 installed cman.i386 2.0.84-2.el5_2.2 installed Every machine (hp blade server ) has 4 interfaces, bounded in this way: Eth0, eth1

Hi List, We're using bonding to create bond0 with 2 NICs, and noticing that CentOS 5 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 (and presumably older) creates bond1 as well. I'd like to remove bond1 from the system, so that our monitoring scripts don't pick it up, except for those machines that actually do have a bond1. So... how does one remove bond1? Thanks! Misc info below of configuration and

Anyone know how to get statistics on bonded interfaces? I have a system that does not use eth0-3, rather we have bond0, bond1, bond2. The members of each bond are not eth0-3, rather they are eth6, eth7, etc. I didn't see anything in the man page about forcing sar to collect data on specific network interfaces.

hello, With CentOS 6.6, I try to configure two bonding interfaces via kickstart, but it works only with bond0, I don't understand why I can't configure bond1 the same way. I found this old post: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-March/133439.html I have exactly the same problem. Who found the trick? best regards Fr?d?ric Benninger

Hi, In one of our xen server, I am using two bonding. bond0 : Is for trunk, where the vlans are attached , port eth0 & eth1 is attached to bond0 bond1 : eth2 & eth3 are attached to bond1, where physical ip has been set . In the /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp, I am using (network-script *multi-network-bridge*) , the

Hello, I have a server with 4 NICS running CentOS 5.2. I have bonded the interfaces together such that 'bond0' consists of eth0-3. This is not a problem, and works fine. However, I now need to create a virtual interface. In a non-bonded server I would just create something like eth0:1, but with a bonded interface I am a bit confused. I have created bond0:1 simple by copying the

Am 22.02.19 um 12:16 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Hai, > > Well, i did some extra checking, gone throug more logs. > ... Nothing. No errors. Sorry, i cant find anything.. > > Almost all my server run unattended updates, execpt the DC's. > > I had a few that where waiting for a reboot tomorrow night, all now rebooted, > and no problems before and

Hi, I''ve set up identical (what I think) machines using SLES 10 x86_64, but a new one of those is saying frequently in /var/log/messages: kernel: bond0: received packet with own address as source address A short summary of ifconfig looks like this: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 eth0

I have two servers with identical hardware ... TYAN i3210w system boards with dual intel gigabit interfaces, and a PCI intel gigabit nic. I'm running Centos 5.4, x86_64, 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 Every other time I reboot, the nics initialize in a different order. anaconda had setup /etc/modprobe.conf with alias lines for the cards: alias eth0 e1000 alias eth1 e1000e alias eth2 e1000e However,

Hi, Sorry of this is the wrong list, trying to find some help. I am trying to set up 2 KVM hosts using Debian 9 (connecting to a 3 node Centos 7.4 gluster cluster) To get the bandwidth I have bonded 2 NICS each end. However while the network works fine for the Debian VM host the VM guests cannot connect/get an IP using DHCP connecting to br0. (Same setup on the Centos end works fine however)

Hi list! I've got a debian "etch" box running samba 3.0.24. The server is a firewall (running Shorewall 3.2.6) with five NICs: eth0 -> DSL (it has a public IP address and it allows all the people browse by masquerading other interfaces) eth1 and eth3 -> bond0 (IP address is 192.168.1.1/24) eth2 and eth4 -> bond1 (IP address is 192.168.2.1/24) BTW, bond+ refers to an

Hello, Where can I find a link (or docs) to *working* network config for xen 4.1.2? My tests (s. below) were not successful. Thank you in advance for any hints. Regards, Mark # --- root@xen411dom0:~# cat /etc/network/interfaces # Used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8). See the interfaces(5) manpage or # /usr/share/doc/ifupdown/examples for more information. auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto bond0

Hi, I configured some ha services using heartbeat, I have this on my log: Nov 14 09:59:06 mail1 heartbeat[3932]: ERROR: Unable to send bcast [-1] packet: Operation not permitted Nov 14 09:59:06 mail1 heartbeat[3932]: ERROR: write failure on bcast bond1.: Operation not permitted how allow broadcast only on some interfaces with shorewall? attacched is shorewall status Thanks Nicola

# modinfo ixgbe filename: /lib/modules/2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe.ko version: 3.15.1-k license: GPL description: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver author: Intel Corporation, <linux.nics at intel.com> srcversion: B390E9D9904338B52C2E361 I have updated this to 3.18.7-1 as well, same results # ifconfig bond1 |grep error

Hi, I am facing a problem when I run tc on the bonded nic cards. When I run tc on a single nic card, it worked perfectly fine. But when I run tc on a bond of two nics, tc gives poor performance. The two nics were bonded in round-robin (load balancing) mode. I created a qdisc, class and a filter as follows: tc qdisc add dev bond0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev bond0 parent 1: classid

With kernel 2.6.13.4 linux bridge with traffic management for 4000users and 20.4 MB/s(tx)/22.4 MB/s(rx) data load of CPU is max 50% With kernel 2.6.15.1 the same linux bridge with the same traffic has 100% CPU load and in top I have ksoftirqd proccess. The machine is P4 3.2 GHz with 1GB of ram and 4 NetGear 620 cards The config is: /sbin/modprobe acenic link=0x0100,0x0100,0x0100,0x0100