similar to: Can I use shorewell stuff for my problem

Hello, My name is Felipe I succesfuly installed Shorewall 4.4.20.3 in Ubuntu 10.04, This installation is for controlling the access into the local Network, My question is if it is possible to make a conecction WAN to LAN using Terminal Name?? i have been searching in goolge but i didnt find an answer!!!! For example we have IP Public into shorewall with 2 interfaces, and in the LAN we have 3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 An Ubuntu 10.04 server running Shorewall 4.4.6.1 hosts three KVM virtual servers on the default libvrt virbr0 bridge at the default vnet+ bridge ports. The bridge and ports are on a separate private subnet (192.168.122.0/24). Each bridge port and the bridge itself are in the dmz, there are two physical interfaces and private local subnets in loc, and

I want to use lastest version of Shorewall in my fresh debian squeeze instalation, so I follow http://www.shorewall.net/Install.htm#Debian but, modify preferences file was not enough for me, I have to modify/add some other files in /etc/apt/ directory: 1.) include testing repo to source.list 2.) add APT::Default-Release "stable"; to apt.conf and pinning all other packages to stable

That works. Thanks. One more followup question though. Once i run opt on bitcode, there is not useful output/transform on bitcode. this rpt files are extra. I am hoping to do something like this, ; RUN: FileCheck --input-file=a.rpt.gold --check-prefix=CHECK-A < a.rpt ; RUN: FileCheck --input-file=b.rpt.gold --check-prefix=CHECK-B < b.rpt i did not find much examples in tests hence

Hi all, I have n no. of extensions in my dialer. from 456 to 556 extensions. I was created 2 other extensions 667 and 668 I need to allow only STD calls to go from this extensions. These all extensions are same context . I need to define the STD dialplan for only this 2 extensions. how I can ? Best Regards, Mahesh Katta *BUZZ**WORKS* Business Services Private Limited BANGALORE | CHENNAI |

Hi, I'm trying to make a attended transfer through AMI. I though i could use Atxfer, and it seems ok, but nothing happens. And I can't find any how-to or description on how to do this. What more do I have to do to make this work? In Asterisk Call Manager: Action: Atxfer Channel: SIP/36-xxxxxx Exten: 33 Priority: 1 Context: Phone Response: Success Message: Atxfer successfully queued

Hello I have pass operating on bitcode file which produces more than one equivalent representation. opt --my-pass <%s | Filecheck %s --my-pass generates files a.rpt b.rpt c.rpt . How do i write test without writing all 3 files to stdin. I have considered CHECK-LABEL for each. it creates bulky checks. Thanks Mahesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi, our Asterisk is connected to an E1 port. So we are using the DAHDI-Driver. Please , how do I tell the driver/Asterisk to wait for overlap digits for in-calls? I found the option "overlapdial=yes" but I did not try yet. Is that "my" option? Is there any option for setting an timeout? Thorsten

Hello I am working on pass which has dependency on multiple passes. Say D1,D2,D3 I used INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(D1) INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(D2) INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(D3) INITIALIZE_PASS_END. While running it through opt tool it, I had to specify this D1,D2,D3 pass names to get this pass executed before my pass. Is there way, to let llvm pass manager to know

Hi Hongbin I am not quite familiar with AnalysisUsage, let me correct question a bit. I have read Writing Pass <http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#specifying-interactions-between-passes>, All examples that i see here are based on collecting information .i.e Analysis Passes. I wonder if this applies to Transformation passes also. e.g. void MyInliner::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage

Hello, I have 2 ISP uplinks (zones: inet1 and inet2), each with a fixed IP on the outside and a routed subnet (/25 and /26) on the inside. So, behind the firewall i have 2 networksegments (lan1 and lan2) with public IP-addresses. The segments are completely isolated from eachother: hosts in zone "lan1" connect only to "inet1" and hosts in zone "lan2" only connect

Hello, I have a question regarding subsetting of vectors. Here's an example of what I'm trying to do: vect.1 <- c(76,195, 290, 380) vect.2 <- c(63, 95, 133, 170, 215, 253, 285, 299, 325, 375) I would like to subset vect.2 so that it has the same length as vect.1, and its numbers are the first corresponging higher value compared to vect.1. The output should be: final.output =

Hello All, When I try to connect to the samba installed linux machine from windows I get the message "Account is not authorized to log in from this station". I have made three entries(user name and password) in the smbpasswd file. But if I log in the windows machine using these user names and passwords I get the message "Account is not authorized to log in from this station".

Dear all, 1. Is it possible to convert centos iso file to vmlinuz, initrd and rfs_raw.img. 2. Can I use only vmlinux, initrd and rfs_raw.img to install via pxeboot. Please share your information regarding this. Thanks and regards Dilip Kumar B L&T Technology Services Ltd www.LntTechservices.com<http://www.lnttechservices.com/> This Email may contain confidential or

Hello All Mongrel Users, For the unintiated, Mongrel is a web server that runs Ruby web applications really fast. Read http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ to get find out more about it. This is the Iron Mongrel release. It is the result of trying to trash Mongrel until it can''t move and then fixing anything that comes up. The work was done on EastMedia''s and VeriSign''s

Hi, we have seen proper register numbers when we have generated assembly files through clang but when we generated dump files from object file then we didn't see expected register numbers. Note : all registers are replaced with R0 *Disassembly of section .text:00000000 <main>: 0: 3000ffcc addik r0, r0, -52 4: f8000000 swi r0, r0, 0 8:

Hi All, I''m using shorewall 4.0.15-1 on debian 5.0.5 and It works fine. I want to start using rules based on users. This is supported in the shorewall-rules file, However it seems that each rule can only be associated with one user or group. Does this mean that I cannot have a rule apply to several users which belong to several groups? Will creating duplicate rules for each user

hello before asking my question I come My name is Santiago and I''m from Spain but I''m in Colombia I followed this guide: https://www.doas.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html but when I run shorewall check, this error occurs: Checking... Initializing... Determining Zones... IPv4 Zones: net loc Firewall Zone: fw Validating interfaces file... ERROR: Invalid

Hello, This is using version 4.4.11.3 (Debian). The following error occurs: ERROR: Duplicate Host Group (eth1:10.128.23.34/16) in zone loc : The configuration is a test config. Commented lines removed to keep it clear: # cat zones fw firewall loc ipv4 # cat interfaces loc eth1 - # cat hosts loc eth1:10.128.23.34/16 # cat policy all all ACCEPT

I am attempting to use the Knock.pm from http://www.shorewall.net/ManualChains.html I am not having much luck making the DNAT- knock work for some reason. Anyone else using this on 4.4.4 that can verify if this still works as documented? Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the