similar to: Monthly traffic limit

Hi ! I found an excellent article about QoS and traffic shaping for VoIP (Asterisk IAX protocol), which is designed to improve sound quality even over very busy lines. http://www.howtoforge.com/voip_qos_traffic_shaping_iproute2_asterisk Should I just cut and paste all that to shorewall''s tcrules (replacing 4569 with 5060)? Additionally, author of this article uses IAX protocol,

Hello list, I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from Shorewall-4.0.2. I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list can help me or explain this situation. I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH # $EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit $INT1_IF 500mbit

I try use setup traffic shaping with Shorewall-4.0.2 and have fault. When i start Shorewall with tc-files configured i get follow messages: ... RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory We have an error talking to the kernel ERROR: Command "tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 500kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1" Failed

Hello, We have a video conference server using tcp and udp 3001 prot in internal, external user said that can''t connect to video server and held on 3001 fail, the following is file configuration, nat: 1.2.3.4 eth1:3 192.168.0.18 rule: video/ACCEPT net loc:192.168.0.18 marco.video: PARAM - - tcp 3000 PARAM - -

Hi. What system or software are you using to show the iptables log files (for example the dropped packages tagged as LOG in the Shorewall rules)? Thank you very much! Bye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files

Hi, I''ve to restart shorewall when my dynamic IP was changed from my ISP. Of course i can with a shell script do it automatically, but the question is still there.. why ? mess-mate -- "I understand this is your first dead client," Sabian was saying. The absurdity of the statement made me want to laugh but they don''t call me Deadpan

Guys, Just a quick check. From what i have read in the shorewall site, intrazone traffic is allowed completely by shorewall i.e. there is no filtering or packet size limiting ,etc,etc. I ask this becos after getting shorewall up and running well, someone has complained that they cannot print pdf files larger than 100k at one go but that they have to print one page at a time. Some details;

Hi, I am one of the developers of the FreeWRT project and I want to give you some feedback. Shorewall runs quite fine on our supported devices, but we need to patch Shorewall to get it running as expected. The problem is the ip command and busybox 1.4.2. Some words about busybox: BusyBox is a multi-call binary that combines many common Unix utilities into a single executable.

My firewall is using shorewall 3.0.x and CentOS Recently, I found that firewall is attaching from ARP spoofing.. There are a lot of "out of socket memory" in messages log ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and

This mail goes mainly to Tom, as he sent some Laptop configurations files to the list. I checked the files you had sent to the list as answer to [Shorewall-users] Shorewall on a laptop Now - Is there a specific reason why you actually lock/blacklist the following ports ? - udp 1024:1033,1434 - tcp 57,1433,1434,2401,2745,3127,3306,3410,4899,5554,6101,8081,9898 These should IMHO be blocked by

Hi, I have the following problem while activating this rule entry using shorewall-shell: ACCEPT:notice:rul WAN:139.x.x.226 INT:139.x.x.153-139.x.x.156 udp 1024:65535 1024:65535 "-m iprange" in front of "--dst-range" is missing in the activation command. The logging entry (above) is set correct. Below is the debug output. Thanks Regards Günter + case $level in +

Shorewall 3.4.6 running on SuSE Linux 10.2 Compiling Rule Activation... Shorewall configuration compiled to /var/lib/shorewall/.restart Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Restarting Shorewall.... /sbin/shorewall: line 665: 6782 Segmentation fault $SHOREWALL_SHELL ${VARDIR}/.restart $debugging restart got this with V3.4.4, updated to 3.4.6 this morning, but that didn''t help.

I remember to see something about that in shorewall.net some time ago, but I could not find it today ... The case : Debian Etch, Shorewall 3.2.6, squid3 and Apache 2 . The first 3 where already running fine for some time ... Now I need to setup an Apache server to allow some web mannagement, things like PHPsysinfo, phppgadmin, just for internal net, no web access . but port 80 is redirected to

Hello, please excuse me if this has been discussed or even solved before, but I could not find it in the archives. I''m in the process of migrating several gateways to shorewall-lite, keeping the configfiles on one central adminstrative machine, basically following the guide at http://www.shorewall.net/CompiledPrograms.html . As I understand it, the local /etc/shorewall directory on the

In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the bug. If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was

In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the bug. If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was

Dear shorewall list enthusiasts, I recently set up a dedicated linux box running shorewall in order to isolate my network from the "evil other side" :) It works so well that I first have to thank and congratulate everybody that took part in this project ! Then, I have a question, that separates my setup from "wonderful" to "heaven" : I activated the

Hello !! I ve just install shorewall-common and shorewall-shell I can''t defined a network using the CIDR format for my DMZ in /etc/shorewall/hosts fast eth2:172.17.0.0/16 epac eth2:172.18.0.0/16 fsa eth2:172.19.0.0/16 bu eth2:172.20.0.0/16 recto eth2:172.21.0.0/16 dmz eth1:81.91.225.224/27 I receive this error: ERROR: Invalid zone definition for

Hi i have a small problems on one of my interface : i can''t get traffic out and don''t know why. Ither user say me that i can use Shorewall for create the counter and after get the information for mrtg. Anyone know what is the process into shorewall 2.0.X ? i don''t want monitor by specified port, but all ports Thanks for your help

Hello, My hoster updated its kernel packages... It contained some old problems that should have been fixed. My servers have now a wonderful 2.6.21.5 kernel + grsec running. Both are running Debian 4.0 (stable release). mx:/etc/shorewall# iptables --version iptables v1.3.6 mx:/etc/shorewall# uname -a Linux mx.network-hosting.com 2.6.21.5-grsec-xxxx-grs-ipv4-32 #1 SMP Fri Jul 27 17:18:23 CEST