similar to: [PATCH] xfstests: remove recursive include in filter.btrfs

The btrfs-progs tools changed the output: - 100GiB instead of 100GB - The number of spaces was changed Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> --- common/filter | 2 +- common/filter.btrfs | 3 ++- tests/btrfs/006 | 6 +++--- tests/btrfs/006.out | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git

This testscript creates reflinks to files on different subvolumes, overwrites the original files and reflinks, and moves reflinked files between subvolumes. Originally submitted as testcase 302, changes are made based on comments from Eric: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00231.html Two new common/rc functions used in this script (_require_cp_reflink and _verify_reflink) have been

So if you have a mount command that doesn''t use /etc/mtab then it will spit out a different device for the mounted device. So say we have SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc" we will turn this into SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda" SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc" and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns into this

This testscript creates reflinks to files on different subvolumes, overwrites the original files and reflinks, and moves reflinked files between subvolumes. Originally submitted as testcase 302, changes are made based on comments from Eric: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00231.html Two new common/rc functions used in this script (_require_cp_reflink and _verify_reflink) have been

I''ve cloned: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git When I build I get compile errors trying to build dmapi. Do I need to build this? I''ve attached a log of the build (build.log). If I ignore the build error and just go ahead and try to run the tests my first question is, "What do I run?". Looking at the README it looks like I want to run

This is similar to a previous fix I sent. 1 gig makes us do mixed file block groups for btrfs, so these enospc tests will usually fail because we don''t have space for metadata, which is the case for this test. So jack the size up to 1.5gig so that btrfs can do its normal thing and pass the test. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- tests/generic/256 |

Currently we can specify the testing filesytems like ''check -xfs'', but btrfs is not support in this kind of command option. Add the option ''check -btrfs'' support. Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> --- check | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/check b/check index ff8fbcf..9c40615 100755 --- a/check +++ b/check @@

I''m running into a problem with the btrfs-cleaner thread becoming blocked on xfstests 068. The test locks up indefinitely without completing (normally it finished in about 45 seconds on my test box). I''ve replicated the issue on 3.10.0_rc5 and the for-linus branch of 3.9.0. I ran a git bisect on the 3.9.0 for-linus branch, and tracked my issue to the following commit: commit

I''m not sure how the numbering is supposed to work now that we''ve split everything out so I''m just going with the next number in the directory. This is a regression test for btrfs send, we had a problem where we''d try to send a file that had been deleted in the source snapshot. This is just to make sure we don''t have the same problem in the future.

On Oct 17, 2014, at 1:30 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > >> On 10/17/2014 12:19 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: >> >>> I would like to do a short cycle for 6.04, because 64-bit support for >>> ext4 has come up as a very high priority. Therefore I do not want to

This must be possible; not sure how to do it yet. :) After facing the thought of going through my cd collection for a 3rd time for re-encoding, it occurred to me that I should just flac the whole CD and add a cue sheet, and then back up to DVDs. That way -next- time I need to re-encode to any format, I can handle ~1/20th the discs, compared to my whole cd collection. :) Wondering if

Btrfs had some issues with fsync()''ing directories and fsync()''ing after renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing. This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common helper to be shared between generic/311 and generic/320. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- V1->V2: moved this out into its own test instead of

Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> wrote: > >>1) how to generate a cue sheet to store in the flac file (on linux?) >> I've seen cddb2cue, is this a decent way? or cdrdao can generate >> a toc file, then convert that to a cue sheet.... > > > I think whatever provides cdrdao also provides toc2cue which > will convert.

Today, I had to uncleanly shutdown one of our machines due to an error in 2.6.28.3. Durin the boot sequence, the ext4 partition /home experienced a journal replay. /home looks like this: /dev/mapper/volg1-logv1 on /home type ext4 (rw,noexec,nodev,noatime,errors=remount-ro) Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/volg1-logv1 2,4T 1,4T 1022G 58% /home Filesystem

Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me: # mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2 ... unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it. Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a blkdev put after mkfs attempts a get; this is left over

the -k option was missing from the usage() output and was present only in the man page synopsis. Say a few more words about it. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> --- diff --git a/blktrace.c b/blktrace.c index 89aaaac..4e96573 100644 --- a/blktrace.c +++ b/blktrace.c @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ static char usage_str[] = "\n\n" \ "[ -p <port number> |

Hi, I realize that this is not strictly flac-related, but... I've got my collection in flac now, and at the end of the endeavor, I realized that (I think...) I've managed to have a few different encodings in the tags, one way or another. For instance: [root@localhost Zen Arcade]# metaflac --list 01-Something\ I\ Learned\ Today.flac > 1 [root@localhost Zen Arcade]# metaflac

Hi all - Hope this isn't too OT - I've been playing with the file extention mapper VFS module for samba (http://file-ext-map.sourceforge.net/) to play flac files on my Audiotron. The above module takes any *.flac file and presents it as a *.wav to the client, and decodes on the fly when the file is read. It seems to work pretty well, but I often get the first second or so of a song

Thanks for you help. I also tried adding some other informations as you suggest: I can also take into account: - "Reserved block count: XXXXXXX" from tune2fs that gives me the number of blocks reserved for root - Reserved GDT blocks: XXX But I didn't thought about the FS journal. How can I gather information about it? (it's size and any other information?) 2013/9/16

----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@redhat.com> To: "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net>; <Ext3-users@redhat.com> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 4:47 PM Subject: Re: extended filesystems [snip] > So the first thing you've learned is that it is not in fact too much > overhead, because it's not there. ;) > >