similar to: Orthogonal transformation option in pgmm-plm

Dear Ivo, dear list, (see: Message: 70 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:39:19 +0000 From: ivowel at gmail.com Subject: [R] pgmm (Blundell-Bond) sample needed) I think I finally figured out how to replicate your supersimple GMM example with pgmm() so as to get the very same results as Stata. Having no other regressors in the formula initially drove me crazy. This was a case where simpler models are

Dear R Experts--- Sorry for all the questions yesterday and today. I am trying to use Yves Croissant's pgmm function in the plm package with Blundell-Bond moments. I have read the Blundell-Bond paper, and want to run the simplest model first, d[i,t] = a*d[i,t-1] + fixed[i] + u[i,t] . no third conditioning variables yet. the full set of moment conditions recommended for system-GMM,

Good day fellow R users: I have routinely received the following message when attempting to estimate a GMM model for a somewhat square panel (N = 20, T = 9-27, Obs = 338) using the pgmm function in the plm package: Error in function (..., deparse.level = 1) : number of rows of matrices must match (see arg 2) So far, I am not wedded to a particular GMM model but what I have used thus far is

dear giovanni--- thanks for answering on r-help to me as well as privately. I very much appreciate your responding. I read the plm vignette. I don't have the book, so I can't consult it. :-(. I am going to post this message now (rather than just email it privately), because other amateurs may have similar questions in the future, and find this message and your answers via google.

Dear R-Users, I am using pgmm in the plm package to estimate a dynamic models with panel data. Besides the lagged dependent variable, I also have some other endogenous variables. Does the pgmm have an argument that allows me to specify these endogenous variables and their instruments? I didn't find this argument in the description and online. Thank you very much for your help!

Dear Sir, I am using the package pgmm you build in panel regression. However, I found that when T is 10, N=30, the error would show as following: system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number But the similar code works well on Stata, so I wonder how I can optimize the algorithm, for example , the inverse matrix optimization ? And I have checked my data as well, no

Hi list, has anyone succeeded in using pgmm() on any dataset besides Arellano/Bond's EmplUK, as shown in the vignette? Whatever I try, I eventually get a runtime error because of a singular matrix at various points in pgmm.diff() (which gets called by pgmm()). For example, when estimating a "dynamic" version of the Grunfeld data: data(Grunfeld, package="Ecdat") grun

Dear Sir or Madam: I am Shaojuan Liao, the 3rd year Ph.D. student from Econ Department, Virginia Tech. I don't know whether it is appropriate to ask you questions on the command pgmm. But I don't know how to deal with the case where all X are exogenous and all T time periods' X can be used as the instrument. Problem 1: I know when X are predetermined, such as Z=[y1,X1,X2, 0,

Hello, I've been trying to fit Arrellano-Bond model with pgmm but I am getting very strange errors. I've looked around and found no reference to them. I've specified the model in dozens of different ways, and each seems to give me a new kind of error. This leads me to believe this has to do with the way the data is specified, but I can't see anything thats wrong with. My

Hello, although I searched for a solution related to my problem I didn?t find one, yet. My skills in R aren?t very large, however. For my Diploma thesis I need to run a GMM estimation on a dynamic panel model using the "pgmm" - function in the plm-Package. The model I want to estimate is: "Y(t) = Y(t-1) + X1(t) + X2(t) + X3(t)" . There are no "normal" instruments

Hello, I am switching to R from Stata and I am having particular trouble with the transition from Stata's 'xtabond' and 'ivreg' commands to the "plm" package. I am trying to replicate some of the dynamic panel data work using the UK Employment data in Arellano and Bond (1991) and available as 'EmplUK' under the 'plm' package. I have been

Hi there! Today I tried to estimate models using both plm and pgmm functions, with an interaction between X1 and lag(X2, 1). And I notice two issues. Let "Y=b_1 * X_1 + b_2 * X_2 + b_3 * X_1 * x_2 + e" be our model. 1) When using plm, I got different results when I coded the interaction term with I(X1 * lag(X2, 1)) and when I just saved this multiplication X1 * lag(X2, 1) in a

Dear Limin, might be just about anything. Could you please provide a reproducible example? Best, Giovanni ----------------- Original message ---------------------- Message: 51 Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:36:03 +0800 (CST) From: ??? <dlmsos at 163.com> To: r-help at r-project.org Subject: [R] pgmm function Message-ID: <b2cba0.35fc.128a41e3684.Coremail.dlmsos at 163.com> Content-Type:

Hi, I want to estimate a dynamic paneldata model with the following code, but unfortenately I received the error message below. form<-PB~Activity+Solvency+Cap_Int

Hi all, I am trying to do my own fixed effects regression using the Within function in PLM. I apply the Within function to all my pseries and then run OLS on the transformed vectors using lm(). When I compare the results to those obtained via plm ("within"), the estimates are not always the same. Specifically, if there are missing values (NA), the parameter estimates are not the same.

Dear, I built the generalized method of moments model to estimate the sales rank in the bookstore using plm package in R. The equation is: data1.gmm <- pgmm(dynformula(lnsales_rank ~ ln_price + avg_ham_rate + avg_spam_rate + num_of_ham+ num_of_spam + ship_code2 +ship_code3 +ship_code4+ ship_code5+ ship_code6 + ship_ code7, lag = list(0, 0, 0, 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), log =FALSE), data=data,

Hello, I am trying to use the plm package for panel econometrics. I am just trying to get started and load my data. It seems from most of the sample documentation that I need to use the pdata.frame function to get my data loaded. However, even after installing the "plm" package, my R installation cannot find the function. I am trying to follow the example in plmEN.pdf (

Dear All, I'm looking to perform an ANOVA between two nested panel fixed effects models. I tried with anova, as well as with waldtest. anova tells me there is no method available for plm objects, while waldtest tells me my models are not nested. I think they are instead. The difference between the two models is that in the second I let the regression coefficients of a given variable variate

Hello. Just a quick follow-up, for other 'plm' users on the list: - the problem turned out to be logs of zero values hidden in the big dataset - trying log(xx) would not reveal the problem, because log(0)=-Inf is a valid result in log() while it is an invalid input to plm() --> it is always advisable to try lm(yourformula, yourdata) as a first diagnostic check when plm(yourformula,

Dear plm Package users, I use the plm package a lot but I have not updated it for some times. Now I realized the following difficulty with the summary.plm function (demonstrated with the example from the ?plm documentation). library(plm) data("Produc", package="Ecdat") estimation_method<-"within" estimation_effect<-"individual" zz