similar to: [patch] Allowing to_xml to rename keys in lower camel case format

Dear all, Given the following vector: > (z <- c('R project', 'hello world', 'something Else')) [1] "R project" "hello world" "something Else" I know how to obtain all capitals or all lower case letters: > tolower(z) [1] "r project" "hello world" "something else" > toupper(z) [1] "R

I''ve got some changes queued up that I want to run by everyone before I commit. First, I''ve added a filter that sets the :format variable to "fbml" when you are in the canvas view. That means with edge rails you can use index.fbml.erb for facebook and index.html.erb for non facebook requests and the right thing will happen. This is important for doing things

On 2020-06-19, Justin Hibbits via llvm-dev wrote: >On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:38:02 +0100 >Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 16:43, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > If anyone's keeping track of the voting: >> > +1 for "dev" (contrasts with "release")

Since OpenSocial is bound to take over the world, I''ve just released a very early version of my opensocial container plugin. If you are brave, try it out and let me know how it goes. You can check it out here: http://elctech.com/2007/11/27/opensocial-container-plugin-0-0-1 -- Ryan Garver rgarver-jrinBW/Jv4hBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org

During that variable renaming debate, there was a discussion about discussion about doing things all at once, piecemeal or not at all. An issue that wasn't really resolved I think. I had the impression that the efforts fizzled out a bit, and I thought this renaming was maybe related to that, but I'm neutral on if we should do variable renaming. All I'm asking as a kindness if we could

Hi everyone, I have a code style question: should full test programs (.c,.cpp files) use the documented CamelCase from http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-types-functions-variables-and-enumerators-properly or instead use lower_with_underscores as I've been told the .ll lit test files should use? I see both in existing files, and in particular for projects/compiler-rt I cannot

I''m creating a new rails app. The application is named BigIdea. Should I create this project using: 1. rails bigidea or 2. rails big_idea I know both will work, but just want to get off to the right start using the proper rails naming convention. Thanks! Brian -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this

> -----Original Message----- > From: David Greene [mailto:dag at cray.com] > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 2:40 PM > To: Robinson, Paul > Cc: asb at lowrisc.org; clattner at nondot.org; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; > nd at arm.com > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: changing variable naming rules in LLVM > codebase > > via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Hi, a couple of days ago I filed a ticket related to a problem with the to_xml ActiveRecord method. ( https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3982-patch-solved-a-bug-that-prevented-xml-serialization-when-activerecord-attributes-contains-more-than-column-values ). I solved it by making to_xml to infere the type by means of a ruby-xml type conversion, using a Hash that was already

I don't think anyone is arguing to change longstanding policy. From a downstream perspective many small renaming changes do increase overhead for us. One thing that happens to downstream projects is that they support more than one LLVM version, we (JuliaLang) currently try to support latest stable + master. So for me the question is more, are renaming changes worth downstream projects not

Hi Mehdi! I think the value to upstream (of doing mass reformatting in fewer commits) has to do with the intrusion of nonfunctional commits into `git blame` kinds of research. Every line that someone touches for a formatting reason necessarily obscures the history of functional changes in that block of code. The fewer of those that people have to work around, the better. I admit this is a

Change all camelcase function names to lower case in hv_mouse Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/hv_mouse.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1

Change all camelcase function names to lower case in hv_mouse Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/hv_mouse.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1

Hello, I''m a beginner, so any hints are appreciated; I''m still trying to find my way around Rails code. For a bug I''ve found I need to create a table called "values" so I added this: create_table :values do |t| t.integer :value end among the other table creations in activerecord/test/cases/migration_test.rb. Is that ok? But then, when I run the tests

Hi Rui, I’m totally positive on switching to camelCase convention. In fact I have been always uncomfortable with the current naming approach. My only suggestion/concern is that we should provide a transition path not only for the trunk code in the repository, but for eventual out-of-trunk code with implementations of custom architectures. I have currently a custom backend implemented on top of

Hi there, At the end of last week we saw a number of commits go in that were camelCasing batches of MCStreamer::Emit* and AsmPrinter::Emit* functions. For example: - https://reviews.llvm.org/rG549b436beb4129854e729a3e1398f03429149691 - https://reviews.llvm.org/rGa55daa146166353236aa528546397226bee9363b - https://reviews.llvm.org/rG0bc77a0f0d1606520c7ad0ea72c434661786a956 Unfortunately all these

I''ve been working on a ruby/rails implementation of an opensocial container, and I''m curious how many people would actually be interested in such a beast if it was open source. Even with a container you still have some amount of work integrating it into your own system, it''s no small task. On one hand I''d like to open source it, especially if I could get one

Hi Philip, I think you might be reading more into the suggestion/discussion than is actually there. * I do not want upstream developers "trying to be polite" if that delays otherwise worthwhile work. Nobody suggested that. It’s perfectly possible to “be polite” and still not delay worthwhile work. * The current policy is "downstream is on their own". Nobody

This looks really great to me Rui, and I’m also pleased to see the positive comments on the review thread. Thank you for driving this forward! -Chris > On Jul 4, 2019, at 9:50 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I wrote a tool <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123> to batch-rename variable names so that they are in camelCase, and I applied the

When I call to_xml on an array, I want it to get the XML for all the elements in it. I''ve defined to_xml in my class. >> r.to_xml => "<video><id>1</id><views>2</views></video>" >> a = [r] => [#<StatisticsReport:0x3259f38 @video_id=1, @views=2>] >> a.to_xml => "<?xml version=\"1.0\"