llvm dev - Apr 2016 - code style for test programs: CamelCase?

Hi everyone, I have a code style question: should full test programs
(.c,.cpp files) use the documented CamelCase from
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-types-functions-variables-and-enumerators-properly
or
instead use lower_with_underscores as I've been told the .ll lit test files
should use?  I see both in existing files, and in particular for
projects/compiler-rt I cannot blindly follow the existing code as the
existing sanitizers were added with a separate style, with the consensus
being that new sanitizer files should switch to the LLVM style.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160428/9863d557/attachment.html>

Derek Bruening via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
writes:
> Hi everyone, I have a code style question: should full test programs
> (.c,.cpp files) use the documented CamelCase from
>
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-types-functions-variables-and-enumerators-properly
> or
> instead use lower_with_underscores as I've been told the .ll lit test
files
> should use?  I see both in existing files, and in particular for
> projects/compiler-rt I cannot blindly follow the existing code as the
> existing sanitizers were added with a separate style, with the consensus
> being that new sanitizer files should switch to the LLVM style.
When in doubt follow the LLVM style. Most cases where you see C++ code
that doesn't follow it are from before we codified the style in the
docs.

For C++ code it's easiest to use clang-format which by default implements
the LLVM style.



2016-04-28 20:32 GMT+03:00 Justin Bogner via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
>
> Derek Bruening via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> > Hi everyone, I have a code style question: should full test programs
> > (.c,.cpp files) use the documented CamelCase from
> >
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-types-functions-variables-and-enumerators-properly
> > or
> > instead use lower_with_underscores as I've been told the .ll lit
test
files
> > should use?  I see both in existing files, and in particular for
> > projects/compiler-rt I cannot blindly follow the existing code as the
> > existing sanitizers were added with a separate style, with the
consensus
> > being that new sanitizer files should switch to the LLVM style.
>
> When in doubt follow the LLVM style. Most cases where you see C++ code
> that doesn't follow it are from before we codified the style in the
> docs.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160428/f2d20f3a/attachment.html>