similar to: [PATCH] auto_discovery_link_tag with more bacon!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] auto_discovery_link_tag with more bacon!"

2006 Jul 11
0
auto_discovery_link_tag in a partial ?
I have a partial that has a link_to(image_tag()) for an RSS feed. I would like this feed to be auto discoverable (link tag in document head). The problem is that it is too late to stick something in the head of the document by the time I am rendering this partial. The auto_discovery_link_tag must be in the head of the doc. Any suggestions ? -- thanks, Andrew -- Posted via
2007 Dec 20
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Patches-16424 ] Ruby 1.9 Compatibility
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 20 Dec 2007 15:48 Subject: [ mocha-Patches-16424 ] Ruby 1.9 Compatibility To: noreply at rubyforge.org Patches item #16424, was opened at 2007-12-19 02:43 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7479&aid=16424&group_id=1917 Category: None
2015 May 05
0
Bug#776094: dovecot-imapd: corrupts mailbox after trying to retrieve it (fwd)
I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure: telnet localhost 143 and then type this: A0001 CAPABILITY A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser" A0003 SELECT "inbox-b" A0004 EXPUNGE A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE A0006 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER A0007 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] A0008 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) A0009 EXPUNGE A0010 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER A0011 FETCH
2015 May 06
0
Bug#776094: dovecot-imapd: corrupts mailbox after trying to retrieve it (fwd)
On 05/06/2015 09:57 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote: > On 05/05/2015 05:26 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: >> I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure: >> >> telnet localhost 143 >> >> and then type this: >> >> A0001 CAPABILITY >> A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser" >> A0003 SELECT "inbox-b" >> A0004
2008 Aug 13
4
Marking as Read causes Body.Peek on ALL messages - Reasonable?
I've noticed when I select a folder of messages (Thunderbird) and mark them all as read (or unread) it produces the following IMAP transcript: Source Destination Info c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: DONE s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: 20 OK Idle completed. c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: 21 uid store 1:20 -Flags (\Seen) s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: * 1 FETCH (UID 1 FLAGS (\Recent NonJunk)) c.c.c.c s.s.s.s
2007 Aug 23
3
test/mocks/ in rails directory structure
Anyone ever uses test/mocks/development && test/mocks/test directories ? If someone does, test/mocks/development doesn''t really seem like a nice place for putting development environment mocked classes. May be mocks/ should be moved to RAILS_ROOT ? Or may be it should be removed. Views ? -- Cheers! - Pratik http://m.onkey.org
2006 Aug 03
6
Listing all of a nested Resources
I''ll use the example on the Rails blog. map.resources :posts do |posts| posts.resources :comments, :trackbacks end Now comments are at /posts/:post_id/comments. Okay but what if I want to list all the comments for all the posts. It should be at /comments, but that isn''t map that way. Can I map comments twice? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2015 May 05
2
Bug#776094: dovecot-imapd: corrupts mailbox after trying to retrieve it (fwd)
Am 05.05.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Santiago Vila: > I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure: > > telnet localhost 143 > > and then type this: > > A0001 CAPABILITY > A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser" > A0003 SELECT "inbox-b" > A0004 EXPUNGE > A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE > A0006 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER > A0007
2015 May 06
2
Bug#776094: dovecot-imapd: corrupts mailbox after trying to retrieve it (fwd)
On 05/05/2015 05:26 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure: > > telnet localhost 143 > > and then type this: > > A0001 CAPABILITY > A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser" > A0003 SELECT "inbox-b" > A0004 EXPUNGE > A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE > A0006 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER > A0007 FETCH
2006 Aug 02
0
Updating scaffolding to better fit Resources
Now that were designing are controllers to just be CRUD, scaffolding makes a lot of sense (DHH must of had this planed from the beginning). The current scaffolding should be modified to better fit Resources. Scaffolding doesn''t need to be redone, it just needs a few tweaks. I''ve already started converting the scaffold method. I made a plugin, but it still needs some work.
2006 Jul 24
0
Dynamic Scope plugin
Adds dynamic methods to scope. Examples scope_posts_to_user { yield } #=> Post.with_scope({ :find => { :conditions => [ ''user_id = ?'', params[:user_id] ]}, :create => { :user_id => params[:user_id] } }) { yield } scope_messages_to_mailbox { yield } #=> Message.with_scope({ :find => { :conditions => [ ''mailbox_id = ?'',
2013 Mar 07
2
Core dump in 2.2.rc2 with FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[ALL]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Usingt ./sbin/dovecot --version 2.2.rc2 (7a08461c5559) with Maildir, 2 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[ALL] dumps core, bt full is: #0 0x00007fa166e721b5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x00007fa166e74fc0 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00007fa16721ac47 in default_fatal_finish
2013 Jul 02
3
[PATCH RFC] xen-netback: remove guest RX path dependence on MAX_SKB_FRAGS
This dependence is undesirable and logically incorrect. It''s undesirable because Xen network protocol should not depend on a OS-specific constant. It''s incorrect because the ring slots required doesn''t correspond to the number of frags a SKB has (consider compound page frags). This patch removes this dependence by correctly counting the ring slots required.
2015 May 04
4
imapc fetch optimization
Hi, On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >> >> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively
2006 May 25
1
save() saves extra stuff if object is not evaluated
Hi, it looks like save() is saving all contents of the calling environments if the object to be saved is *not* evaluated, although it is not that simple either. After many hours of troubleshooting, I'm still confused. Here is a reproducible example (also attached) with output. I let the code and the output talk for itself: peek <- function(file, from=1, to=500) {
2003 Sep 04
1
still getting weird .{inbox} folder creations with latest -test7
Hi, I am still getting strange creation and mailbox lookups from 0.99.11-test7. dovecot creates in ~/Maildir/ .INBOX/ .imap.index .imap.index.cache .imap.index.log .customflags dovecot-uidlist .INBOX seems to be a reference to ~/Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} yet I
2005 Mar 08
0
Re: [linux-cifs-client] Mounting directories below share level
On Friday 4th March 2005, Steven French said, in part: > I did some experiments and confirmed that for this "deep mapping" > (http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/w2kdmap.html) mount of > a complex target ie \\server\share\dir > 1) the path component following the share name is not sent by windows (it > is sent by linux cifs and smbfs - and samba then
2015 May 04
1
imapc fetch optimization
On 04 May 2015, at 18:45, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 04 May 2015, at 16:59, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH
2007 Sep 14
4
Refactoring ActiveRecord's private methods
As it currently stands, ActiveRecord has alot of private and protected methods in the Base class. >> ActiveRecord::Base.methods.size => 427 >> ActiveRecord::Base.protected_methods.size => 32 >> ActiveRecord::Base.private_methods.size => 193 I really loved the suggestion by Courtenay in Refactoring AR::Base.find (http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/
2016 Apr 04
1
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
On 04/04/2016 07:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:29:14PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Might have been better as a separate migration patch and then a >> compaction patch. It's prefixed mm/compaction, but most changed are >> in mm/migrate.c > > Indeed. The title is rather misleading but not sure it's a good idea > to separate