similar to: Re: [XenARM] Regarding Xen-ARM for Cortex-A8 on Fast Model Emulators [FME]

* Apologies for multiple posting * I attached to my previous e-mail a .r file, and it was not permitted by the rules of the mailing lis. Again, please receive my sincere apologies for this. I re-send again the e-mail with .txt attachemnt in the hope someone an help me to solve my problem. I'm trying to fit a set an ODE to an experimental time series. In the attachment you find the R code I

I am attempting to calibrate a forest growth model using FME. I have several spatially separate plots with time series growth data for each(eg, height, basal area, etc.). Thus 2 independent variables: time and plot. Is there a way that I can calculate a model cost that takes into account these different plots? I notice in the documentation for the modCost function that there is a note

Dear All,   please help with some thoughts on overcoming the following issues, if possible:   #R Code   require(deSolve) require(FME) pars <- list(k = 0.06,v=18) intimes <- c(0,0.5,12,12.5,50) input   <- c(800,0,800,0,0) forc <- approxfun(intimes, input, method="constant") model <- function(pars, times=seq(0, 50, by = 1)) {   derivs <- function(t, state, pars) {     

Dear R users, I'm trying to fit a set an ODE to an experimental time series. In the attachment you find the R code I wrote using modFit and modCost of FME package and the file of the time series. When I run summary(Fit) I obtain this error message, and the values of the parameters are equal to the initial guesses I gave to them. The problem is not due to the fact that I have only one

Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle Hi, I am happy to announce that a patch for a new emulator platform Goldfish (QEMU 0.82 based Android emulator) is released at wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenARM. Sang-bum _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hello, I would like to know if the ARM architecture is well supported. At Xen.org it is mentionned in available architectures, but does it work really well ? I''m looking at CPU like "Tile64" from Tilera : http://www.tilera.com/products/processors/TILE64 The wiki http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenARM doesn''t seem to be up to date. Is it ? Any advice ? Thanks,

I am not an expert in cross-compiling, in fact Ian (still on vacation) is the one who set it up. I still compile tools natively. However I can tell you that you don''t actually need python, in reality in order to get the basic system working you only need to compile: tools/libxc tools/xenstore tools/console tools/libxl On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Khandelwal, Shubham wrote: > Hi, > >

Hi Xen Developers, I had tested new XenARM for Arndale board that is updated in Anthony''s tree from 2 days ago. I expected that will be working. But, I can not boot Dom0 Kernel. I used kernel and XenARM both are from Xen Wiki(http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Arndale). It (seems) stopped after "(XEN) Freed 212kB init memory" message. When I

Dear all, I followed the steps described in the wiki in order to get an Arnadle board running Xen, but I''m having trouble in starting a domU. Let me describe you the steps I followed. Sorry for such a long mail, but I think that a verbose description is necessary so you can point me what I''m doing wrong. I couldn''t boot properly over the network. This is why I

Hi All, I have setup my samba as a PDC and testparm gives me the right result, but when I am trying to add my XP client to SAMBA I receive an error as "Logon failure: bad username or password" or "Username could not be found". I am using root as the domain administrator and have added root account using smbpasswd and can see it using pdbedit -Lv. I can logon successfully

Hi All, Has any one got an idea of how to make clients automatically find the BDC when the PDC is stopped. Both PDC and BDC are running by Samba authenticating again a LDAPSAM backend replicated on both the PDC with master LDAP database and BDC with replicated LDAP database. But when I stop PDC the clients are not detecting the BDC broadcast. I can see that the replication is of

On Mon, 6 May 2013, Chen Baozi wrote: > On Mar 25, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Chen Baozi wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I''m reading Mini-OS''s codes and to estimate the amount of work porting it to > >> ARM (Ian''s GSoC idea this year). >

Hi All, We are running Samba as a PDC on SUSE 9.3 and everything was running fine since we started it. All of a sudden I have started to have problems with the domain logon, nothing has changed since friday when I know it was working fine without any problems. The users are just unable to logon to the domain and getting an error message "The domain controller is down or computer

On 2013-10-18 7:11 AM, Sebastian Reimers wrote: > Hello!, > > i've just compared the 1.0.3 release with the master branch > on a BeagleBone Black (AM335x 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 with NEON > floating-point accelerator) and Arch Linux ARM. > > At the moment I dont no why, but I see that 1.1 is much slower > in encoding. Are there any default changes, that I missed and could

I wrote: > In a floating point build > it's enabled only at complexity setting 10 Sorry. I meant that in a _fixed_point_ build the new analysis code is enabled only at complexity setting 10. It's currently enabled for floating point builds at complexity 7 or higher. Both fixed and float builds default to complexity 9 in 1.1. -r

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Just to clear things up... So 1.1 has some new analysis code that > increases the amount of CPU. When building as floating point (which you > appear to be doing, right?), the new code is enabled at complexity 7 and > up (opusenc defaults to complexity 10 IIRC). This is why you've been >

hi all I saw that llvm-2.7 support arm cortex-a8 now, but I didn't find how to cross build it. thank you all -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100505/976c140e/attachment.html>

hi all I use --enable-targets=arm configure LLVM, build it with Clang, but when I using Clang, it say: #clang -triple /root/a.c error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.' 1 diagnostic generated. How can I use Clang generate code for ARM Cortex-A8? thank you -------------- next part

Hello > My host is Linux on x86, and I want llvm-gcc generate code for Arm > Cortex-A8. > I saw that in LLVM 2.7 Release Notes, but I can't find step to build > it. Anyone tell me? Build llvm-gcc exactly the same way you're building the cross gcc for your target. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State

Hi, Just to clear things up... So 1.1 has some new analysis code that increases the amount of CPU. When building as floating point (which you appear to be doing, right?), the new code is enabled at complexity 7 and up (opusenc defaults to complexity 10 IIRC). This is why you've been seeing an increase in the CPU time. In version 1.0.x, complexity 5-10 are the exactly the same for music.