similar to: Splunk Module Development Recommendations

I noticed that is if I uninstall an MSI that was installed by Puppet, Puppet does not notice. Looking at the source I see it might be checking for a state file to know whether a package is installed or not: C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\puppet\var\db\package\msi\SplunkForwarder.yml So one has to rememebr to delete that too.... Is this design not a problem? Thanks, Mohamed. -- You received this

Ok, what am I doing wrong here? I''m including splunkforwarder::app_server and it''s all working except that it appears that splunkforwarder::common isn''t including splunkforwarder::enabled... class splunkforwarder::enabled { service { ''splunkforwarder'': ensure => running, enable => true,

Hi All. I searched for a Splunk alternative and found LogScape. Have anyone worked with it? There is no documentation available only some very brief installation instructions and there is almost no information in google about successful deployments in linux environments. From my current perspective it is a quite small and not widely used product, am I right? Also videos about search capabilities

C:\Users\ml623>puppet --version 2.7.7 Puppet complains about a package resource I am trying to use saying: Invalid parameter install_options The resource is defined as: package { "splunk": name => $gu_splunk::client::splunk_package, provider => ''msi'', ensure => installed, source =>

I'm using libvirt_lxc to create and manage various containers. I need to enable certain capabilities in a container to support ctdb, and as a quick solution I decided to just enable them all. I *thought* this would do the trick, adding the following XML to my container config: <features> <capabilities policy='allow'> </capabilities> </features> After

We're transitioning from a VM based environment to one that uses LXC based containers running under CentOS 7. CTDB runs fine under our CentOS 7 VMs. The same packages running under LXC however seem to have issues: # systemctl start ctdb.service Job for ctdb.service failed. See 'systemctl status ctdb.service' and 'journalctl -xn' for details. # systemctl status ctdb.service

Hello, Anyone wrote or uses augeas to manage splunk config files and care to share them? Thanks a lot. Mohamed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options,

I'm using libvirt_lxc and that has an XML based configuration. Based on what I've read, I think I need to add this to the ctdb container's config: <features> <capabilities policy='default'> <sys_nice state='on'/> </capabilities> </features> That didn't do the trick though. I need to figure out how to turn on all caps to

On 2015-08-04 at 19:27 +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:11:56AM -0700, Peter Steele wrote: > > We're transitioning from a VM based environment to one that uses LXC based > > containers running under CentOS 7. CTDB runs fine under our CentOS 7 VMs. > > The same packages running under LXC however seem to have issues: > > >

Hello, We have a video conference server using tcp and udp 3001 prot in internal, external user said that can''t connect to video server and held on 3001 fail, the following is file configuration, nat: 1.2.3.4 eth1:3 192.168.0.18 rule: video/ACCEPT net loc:192.168.0.18 marco.video: PARAM - - tcp 3000 PARAM - -

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

Guys, Just a quick check. From what i have read in the shorewall site, intrazone traffic is allowed completely by shorewall i.e. there is no filtering or packet size limiting ,etc,etc. I ask this becos after getting shorewall up and running well, someone has complained that they cannot print pdf files larger than 100k at one go but that they have to print one page at a time. Some details;

Shorewall 3.4.6 running on SuSE Linux 10.2 Compiling Rule Activation... Shorewall configuration compiled to /var/lib/shorewall/.restart Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Restarting Shorewall.... /sbin/shorewall: line 665: 6782 Segmentation fault $SHOREWALL_SHELL ${VARDIR}/.restart $debugging restart got this with V3.4.4, updated to 3.4.6 this morning, but that didn''t help.

Hi Shorewall Users :) I have found shorewall firewall and seems to be interesting. I need to setup a configuration my my network users because i only have 50gb of traffic per month. I want to know if the shorewall can make a 48gb per month limit, but everyday from 1:30 PM do 8:30 AM (happy hour ) the traffic doesnt count. Can shorewall do that ? -- Sem Mais Rui Oliveira 351 - Portugal

Hi. What system or software are you using to show the iptables log files (for example the dropped packages tagged as LOG in the Shorewall rules)? Thank you very much! Bye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files

Hi, I''ve to restart shorewall when my dynamic IP was changed from my ISP. Of course i can with a shell script do it automatically, but the question is still there.. why ? mess-mate -- "I understand this is your first dead client," Sabian was saying. The absurdity of the statement made me want to laugh but they don''t call me Deadpan

In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the bug. If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was

In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the bug. If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was

Hello, Let me first start by saying Shorewall is awesome, and I use it everywhere from single box firewall, to home network firewall, even to our corporate firewall. I am experiencing a problem getting my home firewall to work with my BroadVoice VoIP connection. I use the Sipura SPA-2100 ATA (Analog Telephone Adapter) that came with my BroadVoice account. This happened when I tried to replace