similar to: Windows architecture fact

C:\Users\ml623>puppet --version 2.7.7 Puppet complains about a package resource I am trying to use saying: Invalid parameter install_options The resource is defined as: package { "splunk": name => $gu_splunk::client::splunk_package, provider => ''msi'', ensure => installed, source =>

this snippet: package {ovzkernel: source => $hardwaremodel ? { "x86_64" => "ovzkernel-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.028stab053.14.x86_64", default => "ovzkernel-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.028stab053.14.i686" }, ensure => installed, provider => yum, require =>

My manifest includes this snippet class app_client_openbsd { $app_client_pkgs_obsd = [ ''glib2-2.24.1p2'', ''gtar-1.23p1'' ] package { "${app_client_pkgs_obsd}": ensure => ''installed'', source => "http://${installserver}/openbsd/${operatingsystemrelease}/packages/${hardwaremodel}/${name}.tgz", } This

I have 2 RHEL 5.4 systems where all facter lsb* items are missing. Any ideas? Sanitized facter output: architecture => i386 domain => missyou.edu facterversion => 1.5.7 fqdn => broken.missyou.edu hardwareisa => i686 hardwaremodel => i686 hostname => broken id => root interfaces => eth0,sit0 ipaddress => 1.2.1.5 ipaddress_eth0 => 1.2.1.5 is_virtual => true

Hello dear list. First of all thanks to all the developers for the great work on puppet. After using it for a while, there is not better tool to manage a network! I have a problem with the $processor fact, which seems to be either not there or ignored at all. I try to implement package deployment for the Macs (Intel vs. PowerPC) as described here:

Hello all, I use puppetmaster on a Debian Squeeze server (packaged from Debian 2.6.2-4) I am using a template for Debian Servers which works great for Lenny in order to update my sources.list automagically, here goes: deb http://ftp.ie.debian.org/debian <%= lsbdistcodename %> main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ <%= lsbdistcodename %>/updates main Now the problem

My Samba server is a new install of Ubuntu 10.4 x86 with Samba 3.4.7. Samba is configured as standalone, and shares only a single directory /data for backup purposes. I stumbled across this issue while trying to get my original problem fixed (which I did, thanks to this helpful list.) Run the following in a temporary directory: echo abc > ActivePerl-5.10.1.1007-MSWin32-x86-291969.msi

This page says that llvm works on MinGW: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html I tried to build llvm trunk. llvm build now requires Python: llvm[2]: Creating 'llvm-lit' script... /bin/sh: python: command not found And current stable python version (3.2) doesn't even build on MinGW (see http://bugs.python.org/issue9098). What is the solution on MinGW? Maybe Python was introduced

Hello, We have a video conference server using tcp and udp 3001 prot in internal, external user said that can''t connect to video server and held on 3001 fail, the following is file configuration, nat: 1.2.3.4 eth1:3 192.168.0.18 rule: video/ACCEPT net loc:192.168.0.18 marco.video: PARAM - - tcp 3000 PARAM - -

Good morning, We''ve been testing PE and beginning developing modules for our infrastructure. One of the modules I''m looking to create is an installation for Splunk, with the primary focus at this time, on the Forwarder. I already have the splunkforwarder-5.0.1-143156-linux-2.6-amd64.deb package being fetched from the Master and also performing the installation via dpkg. I

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

RC 3 is now available for testing. Problems corrected: 1) The Shorewall and Shorewall6 ''load'' and ''reload'' commands previously used the setting of RSH_COMMAND and RCP_COMMAND from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (/etc/shorewall6/shorewall6.conf). These commands now use the .conf file in the current working directory. 2) The new parameterized

Guys, Just a quick check. From what i have read in the shorewall site, intrazone traffic is allowed completely by shorewall i.e. there is no filtering or packet size limiting ,etc,etc. I ask this becos after getting shorewall up and running well, someone has complained that they cannot print pdf files larger than 100k at one go but that they have to print one page at a time. Some details;

Shorewall 3.4.6 running on SuSE Linux 10.2 Compiling Rule Activation... Shorewall configuration compiled to /var/lib/shorewall/.restart Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Restarting Shorewall.... /sbin/shorewall: line 665: 6782 Segmentation fault $SHOREWALL_SHELL ${VARDIR}/.restart $debugging restart got this with V3.4.4, updated to 3.4.6 this morning, but that didn''t help.

Hi Shorewall Users :) I have found shorewall firewall and seems to be interesting. I need to setup a configuration my my network users because i only have 50gb of traffic per month. I want to know if the shorewall can make a 48gb per month limit, but everyday from 1:30 PM do 8:30 AM (happy hour ) the traffic doesnt count. Can shorewall do that ? -- Sem Mais Rui Oliveira 351 - Portugal

Hi. What system or software are you using to show the iptables log files (for example the dropped packages tagged as LOG in the Shorewall rules)? Thank you very much! Bye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files

Hi, I''ve to restart shorewall when my dynamic IP was changed from my ISP. Of course i can with a shell script do it automatically, but the question is still there.. why ? mess-mate -- "I understand this is your first dead client," Sabian was saying. The absurdity of the statement made me want to laugh but they don''t call me Deadpan

In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the bug. If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was

In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the bug. If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was

Hello, Let me first start by saying Shorewall is awesome, and I use it everywhere from single box firewall, to home network firewall, even to our corporate firewall. I am experiencing a problem getting my home firewall to work with my BroadVoice VoIP connection. I use the Sipura SPA-2100 ATA (Analog Telephone Adapter) that came with my BroadVoice account. This happened when I tried to replace