similar to: no log/mongrel.log file on win32, looking for sugge stions...

Hello Mongrels around the world! Been thinking a way to unify the issue I described in the subject. For those who aren''t aware, mongrel (actually, mongrel_rails) only generate the log file if daemonize was used (-d) That means no log file under windows, due his lack of fork/daemonization capabilities. Now, users that need to run mongrel on windows cannot report and fill the empty

Here is a part of a working sip.conf for Asterisk with SNOM190 Phones. Try using host=dynamic and have a closer look at the configuration in the snom 190. Also, try using dtmfmode=rfc2833 . [general] realm = hallinux2.gwsnettech.local port = 5060 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 context = default disallow=all allow=alaw allow=ulaw allow=gsm register => 081503:xxxxxx@sipgate.de/081503 language=de tos=0x04

Just so you know, I''ve read the manual :) http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/choosing_deployment.html No php or ssl needed - that is me - simple. So I should be good to go but thought I''d ask. BTW, sorry about the stupid subject. Listening to BNL, you know ;) On 6/27/06, mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org <mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org> wrote: > Send

To follow up this bug report: When you run mongrel_rails without the daemonize option -d on *nix, it also don''t generate log/mongrel.log file! Because win32 cannot Process.fork like *nix, should it start logging to logfile after showing Ctrl+C option? Suggestions are welcome on how to reply to this "feature". -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are

Hi folks, For the past weeks I have been working in solve the problems with mongrel_service and its *crazy* behavior related to standard mongrel_rails. Job made this more slow than usual, but here we are: a beta release. * What''s New? - This version of mongrel_service replaces mongrel_service ruby script with a binary, pre-built executable coded using ServiceFB framework [1] in

Bugs item #16701, was opened at 2007-12-30 02:06 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=16701&group_id=85 Category: win32-service Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Luis Lavena (luislavena) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: 0.6.0 x86-mswin32-60 gem is broken. Initial Comment: In the similar way of

Hello Users!, Since the pre-release 0.3.18 (last week) Lot of things happen in ruby-land (check the DoS security bulletin, please). Anyway, the win32 folks being left on the side of the road, and cannot provide feedback of stability due lack of binaries for the latest releases. So, I managed to upload the pre-built gem to my host: http://www.mmediasys.com/releases/mongrel-0.3.18-mswin32.gem

Hello Guys, Doing conversion of some test for some controllers, still with integrated views. Anyway, I have this: it "should not see Join This Group button on profile page as member" do get "show", :id => @group.id response.should be_success response.should_not have_text(/Join This Group/) end But running with spec (0.9.4), drop me the folling error:

Thank you very much Luis. After re-installing Mongrel and related gems and selecting "Ruby" rather than "win32", mongrel appears to be working fine! > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:30:14 -0300 > From: "Luis Lavena" <luislavena at gmail.com> > > Hi Randy, > > It seems you''re using ruby from cygwin, and not mswin32 (wich is > one-click

> On 5/5/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena at gmail.com> wrote: > > describe "A User (in general)" do > > before(:each) do > > @user = User.new > > end > > > > it { @user.should have_many(:contest_public_votes) } > > it { @user.should have_many(:design_industry_user_interests) } > > it { @user.should

Hi all, I''ve forwarded this from the Mongrel mailing list to see if anyone has any thoughts. In summary, Luis is hitting broken pipe errors on occasion when he tries to stop a service. In a later email Luis mentions that simply ignoring them might not always be the best idea, since sometimes the service seems to no longer respond, even though it still appears to be running fine. Dan

Hello Guys, Been testing fastthread (known on previous releases as optimized_locking) for soon to be released 0.3.18 mswin32 gems (official ones). Attached to this message is the ruby script I used for the test results shown on graphics [1] and [2] The idea of the script is simulate what Mongrel do with threads creating a simple workload for testing Ruby VM stability. [1] refers to normal,

On 10/13/07, Raj Prakash <spamraj at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am having the exact same problem described by Jonah Fox here: > > http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2007-May/003647.html > > I was wondering if you have found a solution yet. It is not the session > issue. > Are you sure about the session storage? have you tried changing it? On XP

Bugs item #16700, was opened at 2007-12-30 02:04 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=16700&group_id=85 Category: win32-api Group: Packaging Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Luis Lavena (luislavena) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: 1.0.5 x86-mswin32-60 gem is broken Initial Comment: Daniel, The gem you have

Hello Guys. I''m upgrading a project from 0.9.8 to 1.0.8, following this procedure: * Removed vendor/plugins/rspec* completely. * installed rspec and rspec_on_rails from svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_1_0_8 * Run script/generate rspec to update spec_helper and spec.opts Now, when running rake, get the following error: superclass mismatch for class Annotation The following

Hello Folks, I tried create a valid gem repository under windows without luck (rubygems show problem with CRLF/LF line endings between *nix and windows). Anyway, I''ve uploaded a new gem to my webpage: http://www.mmediasys.com/releases/mongrel_service-0.3.1-mswin32.gem Whats new? Beside the things added in previous announcement [1], this version add basic process monitoring. What

On 8/11/06, Matthew Bass <pelargir at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, Luis. I''ve been following your Mongrel thread here: > http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2006-May/000210.html > > I''m also running Win2K and have been trying to get Mongrel running as a > service, without much luck. I tried running daemon_test.rb like you said and > was able to get

On the Mongrel FAQ forum, Josh Wehner was having problems with cygwin (don''t know if he fixed it). http://rubyforge.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=6978&forum_id=5450 Due that, I manage to install cygwin, ruby and rails on my humble little computer, it compiled worked ok (taste like *nix, so I felt a bit off-road running this). Anyway, tried to pass test for mongrel, and still get 1

Hello lists! This is not spam, but included the 2 lists (mongrel-users and win32utils-devel) because the both are involved. Attached is the 3rd version of a simple http_service script used previously to get the things right for the mongrel Rails service. With the modifications Zed implemented the past days (into the beta gem, 0.3.13). Now the service part works better. Still, a few things must

Anyone want to take a stab at this? I''ve brought it up before but it''s been a while. Dan Note: forwarded message attached. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Luis