similar to: ssyslogd (encryped syslog)

In response to my post regarding core-sdi's secure syslogd - ssyslogd. Sorry it has taken me so long to post this...been super busy... I didn't get a lot of responses back from the list regarding ssyslogd. Just a couple of people who said they were using it, and it was working. I grabbed the latest version (ssyslogd-1.22) from http://www.core-sdi.com/ssyslog/. I had a problem compiling

Hello, For Unix Password Sync, I am curios how Samba can provide the passwd program with an unencrypted password. If a Windows user presses Control+Alt+Delete and changes their password, are the passwords sent over the network in plain text? Does Samba decrypt the password, then provide it to the passwd program? Thanks, Charles

Hi, well, swift response! Qualcomm has a patched qpopper (2.5) Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders <jpv@jvelders.tn.tudelft.nl> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:43:18 -0700 From: Praveen Yaramada <pyaramad@QUALCOMM.COM> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: Patched Qpopper2.5 release Notification. Hello Folks, As you are already aware that qpopper

I am thinking about writing some sort of deamon which signs syslog files with PGP. This should help dedecting unauthorised changes in the syslog files. What I have in mind works as follows: Whenever a new line is added to a syslog file the existing syslog file checked against the privious made signature. If the file passes this test, the new line(s) is/are added. Then a new signature is

hola, tengo dos vectores de 1134 y 385 elementos que se corresponden con números de accesión de genes. Necesito saber que números son comunes o intersección de vectores. He utilizado intersect(x,y) y me da todo el rato un único valor: V1 V1.1 V1.2 V1.3 V1.4 V1.5 V1.6 V1.7 V1.8 V1.9 V1.10 V1.11 V1.12 1 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305

> Hi All, > > My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy > mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi > but not the next one ldlinux.e64 > > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > Latest updates (including firmware) for the HP ML350 Gen9 were released on 2014DEC19 (v1.21); I would suggest double-checking

Hola Marcos. Yo probaría algo del estilo a esto.... Intersecc<-v1[v1%in%v2] Un saludo, _____________________________ Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Muíños Dirección Xeral de Innovación e Xestión da Saúde Pública Consellería de Sanidade Xunta de Galicia http://dxsp.sergas.es -----Mensaje original----- De: r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org [mailto:r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org] En nombre

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 15:10:47 +0800 From: David Luyer <luyer@UCS.UWA.EDU.AU> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: Serious Linux 2.0.34 security problem I just saw this mentioned on linux-kernel and confirmed it; #include <fcntl.h> #include <errno.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> int main(int

Hi, I''ve been thinking about group membership and the corresponding (weak) restrictions to system resources. Consider the following: % cat > gsh.c main() { system("/bin/sh"); } % cc -o gsh gsh.c % id uid=100(joe) gid=500(users) groups=14(floppy),15(sound) % chgrp sound gsh % chmod g+s gsh % mail abuser Subject: You owe me $5...

Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@I17LINUXB.ISTS.PWR.WROC.PL> wrote: : It seems that most of the RedHat 5.3.12 security patches are in the : standard 5.4.17, except for the patch below. Also, there are more : (different) fixes in 5.4.18 (check h_length against sizeof(sin_addr) : in inet/rcmd.c and inet/rexec.c). : + { : +

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Amara Emerson <aemerson at apple.com> wrote: > On 7 May 2018, at 11:01, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > The simplest way to run a clang test case that I know of is to clone both > llvm and clang repos, run all the

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > The simplest way to run a clang test case that I know of is to clone both > llvm and clang repos, run all the tests, then run an individual test. > > IIRC like so: > > git clone llvm ...... > cd llvm/tools > git clone clang ..... > cd ../../ > mkdir build > cd build > cmake

Phexro <ieure@linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us> writes: > chroot()''d processes. So, important system calls could be modified thus: Since there are tons of syscalls and new ones appearing all the time, "Fixing" some of them doesn''t seem like a good idea. It seems more reasonbale to deny access to all of them, except for a few specific ones (that can moreover be

[mod: This is the second time in a week that someone asks this question: is it a new attack? It sure looks to me like "userland" has completely locked up, but that the kernel is still working. As an isolated case, my diagnosis is: You probably have a bad block in your /bin/login program or something like that. When two people report this in a week, it's starting to become unlikely

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 12:33:00 -0500 > From: "Thomas H. Ptacek" <tqbf@ENTERACT.COM> > On almost all Unix operating systems, having superuser access in a > chroot() jail is still dangerous. In some recent revisions of 4.4BSD > operating systems, root can trivially escape chroot(), as well. I was thinking about possible attacks

If it''s any help, here''s a sed script that is reasonably good at pulling out suspicious-looking items generated by various daemons. Fix appropriately... _H* ========== # this should match a buncha different stuff / [Pp]ermi/b ff / PERMI/b ff / [Rr]efuse/b ff / REFUSE/b ff / [Dd]en[yi]/b ff / DEN[YI]/b ff /[Rr]eject/b ff /REJECT/b ff /[Bb]ogus/b ff /[Pp]assw/b ff /PASSW/b ff

R gurus: I'm trying to get another round of rconifers out and I need some advice/help crushing differences in the examples test. I'm trying to make sure the max sdi values are being respected. I've added a tests/rconifers-Ex.Rout.save (from windows i386-pc-mingw32) and when I ran R CMD check (both R-2.13.0), I got the following results: * using log directory

Hi. I don''t know if this one is known, but I can''t recall seeing anything about it. If it is old news I apologize. I discovered a bug in the inetd that comes with NetKit-B-0-08 and older. If a single SYN is sent to port 13 of the server, inetd will die of Broken Pipe: write(3, "Sun Jan 12 21:50:35 1997\r\n", 26) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe) --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) ---

The advanced voice mail options in RC1 is not providing any functionality except "4 - place outgoing call" and "* - return to mail menu". Below is a sample line from voice mail.conf: 210 => 234,test1,test@dotality.com,,|attach=no|cid=yes|review=yes The is a rew install from the tgz file. No patched have been made to the source code. I did try to apply the advanced10

Hi, As I have not seen any confirmation yet on the list, I just wanted to let you know that sdi.c32 works fine here, at least as fine as my initial syslinux-2.11 asm patch. I only use XPe SDI images with the following structure (of course PART blob size can vary): Type Offset Size Base Address Attr ---- ------------------- -------------------