similar to: Re: Bug in 2.2.3

>Message: 9 >Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:33:16 -0700 >From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@starnetworks.us> >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 500, asterisk user opinions? >To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> >Message-ID: <41AF5FEC.7050406@starnetworks.us> >Content-Type: text/plain;

Has anyone managed to get their hands on a 6.0 image for their 7960's yet? Or is it still in beta? Rumor (official rumor, from Cisco) is that it supports paging and intercom. I'm anxious to start working with those features, if they've been implemented sanely. What would be just as nice would be NOTIFY messages for pushing XML URL's to the phones, but sadly that feature

Hi all, Five minutes ago I heard a rumor that Lennart Poettering has rewritten rsync. My top urgency is to download the latest numbered version of rsync untouched by Lennart Poettering: I'll find out if the rumor is true or false later. I've downloaded rsync rsync-3.1.3.tar.gz and rsync-patches-3.1.3.tar.gz from https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/ . Is the source code in both those

I guess I never sent the message I was going to last week about xterm. [Noteto REW: If I did, kill this message...] It seems that sending xterm an excessively long escape sequence kills it (and perchance might be made to hack it, which would be quite bad.) The xterm in XFree86-3.2 is immune to this problem. I recommend everyone upgrade ASAP. -- - David A. Holland | VINO

A Client runs a RAS network. Users access mailboxes using Outlook Express. The server runs dovecot-1.0.3-13_60. Almost a week ago users began to report that they can't retrieve their mail. The session starts, they seem to retrieve messages, but then the client reports a problem and the session is terminated. Here's what I have in the log: May 28 08:56:46 server dovecot: pop3-login:

so, the rumor is that apple will announce an authoring-tool for e-books tomorrow, and most specifically for digital text-books. and, if you look closely, they _are_ rumors. nothing more... plus, they don't even seem to be coming from sources inside of apple. nonetheless, the rumor is "authoring tools". "garageband for e-books", as ars called it... if it's true,

When the kernel is running in secure boot mode, we lock down the kernel to prevent userspace from modifying the running kernel image. Whilst this includes prohibiting access to things like /dev/mem, it must also prevent access by means of configuring driver modules in such a way as to cause a device to access or modify the kernel image. To this end, annotate module_param* statements that refer

Rumor on the IRC channel has a bug being fixed in the g729.so codec that was causing some hangups under certain circumstances. I see that codec_g729b.so in the ftp://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/g729/ directory has a timestamp of today. Can anyone comment on the advisability of upgrading all of my g729-licensed sites? JT

The following is taken from the Release notes for 2.2.3 (which will be released in a month or so). 2) There has been ongoing confusion about how the /etc/shorewall/routestopped file works. People understand how it works with the ''shorewall stop'' command but when they read that ''shorewall restart'' is logically equivalent to ''shorewall

Hi, I''ve been thinking about group membership and the corresponding (weak) restrictions to system resources. Consider the following: % cat > gsh.c main() { system("/bin/sh"); } % cc -o gsh gsh.c % id uid=100(joe) gid=500(users) groups=14(floppy),15(sound) % chgrp sound gsh % chmod g+s gsh % mail abuser Subject: You owe me $5...

Xen will not be in update 4. We are pushing towards integrating into Nevada sometime this summer. We''re actively working on getting another release out to OpenSolaris. I have my latest attempt at building an ISO image spinning in another window right now. This new release will be based on Nevada build 66. It''s been a ridiculously long time since our last release, and I

Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@I17LINUXB.ISTS.PWR.WROC.PL> wrote: : It seems that most of the RedHat 5.3.12 security patches are in the : standard 5.4.17, except for the patch below. Also, there are more : (different) fixes in 5.4.18 (check h_length against sizeof(sin_addr) : in inet/rcmd.c and inet/rexec.c). : + { : +

Good morning all, I currently have a website that was written in ASP back in 1999. The system is currently running Windows 2003 Server with MsSQL. Before everyone flames me for being in the wrong place, I was wondering if there is a way to allow centos to run old ASP code? I know years ago this wasn't possible without a program like ChiliASP, but noow I heard rumor that apache might have

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.3 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.3 Problems Corrected: 1) If a zone is defined in /etc/shorewall/hosts using <interface>:!<network> in the HOSTS column then startup errors occur on "shorewall [re]start". 2) Previously, if "shorewall status" was run on a system whose kernel lacked

When the kernel is running in secure boot mode, we lock down the kernel to prevent userspace from modifying the running kernel image. Whilst this includes prohibiting access to things like /dev/mem, it must also prevent access by means of configuring driver modules in such a way as to cause a device to access or modify the kernel image. To this end, annotate module_param* statements that refer

Not that I really believe it but I read somewhere (cant find it again) that microsoft was releasing paravirtualization drivers for kvm that would be adaptable to xen. Is this rumor or is this true?   I honestly can''t imagine why Microsoft would do this so I am skeptical, can anyone confirm or deny this? Provide a link perhaps?   thanks,   hikenboot

Hi All It''s been just over two weeks since LSRC 6 tickets went on sale, and it is already over half full. And now, it''s just 16 days to go for LSRC 6. That''s right, two weeks and two days from now you can see Laurent Sansonetti of RubyMotion fame, Uncle Bob Martin, and, best of all, Matz! The Lone Star Ruby Conference is being held Aug 9-11 in Austin, TX, at Norris

Harry Sack wrote: > > > 2007/3/29, Brian Willoughby <brianw@sounds.wa.com > <mailto:brianw@sounds.wa.com>>: > > There actually is no problem with 24-bit support, as I stated > earlier. So before people start chiming in with "me too" - I'd > like to request that you actually say what problem you're seeing, > along with a few

Phexro <ieure@linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us> writes: > chroot()''d processes. So, important system calls could be modified thus: Since there are tons of syscalls and new ones appearing all the time, "Fixing" some of them doesn''t seem like a good idea. It seems more reasonbale to deny access to all of them, except for a few specific ones (that can moreover be

[mod: This is the second time in a week that someone asks this question: is it a new attack? It sure looks to me like "userland" has completely locked up, but that the kernel is still working. As an isolated case, my diagnosis is: You probably have a bad block in your /bin/login program or something like that. When two people report this in a week, it's starting to become unlikely