similar to: my "blacklist" is not working

I have a subroutine to block spammer by CALLERID(number) exten => 4,1,GotoIf(${BLACKLIST()}?blacklisted,s,1) exten => 4,n,Set(goaway=${CALLERID(number):0:2}) exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${goaway}" = "V4" ]?blacklisted,s,1) exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${goaway}" = "V3" ]?blacklisted,s,1) but I just got another spammer (automated calls) who rotates his

Hi, I've been reading all I can on Google (and Asterisk TFOT book) looking for ideas on how to implement an automated blacklist feature. I would like to automatically blacklist a incoming number based on timestamp and count information. For example, if I get a prank call from the same number 5 times within 15 minutes, I want my dialplan to automatically blacklist this number. Should I be

I have always been able to block toll-free numbers by catching them with a line similar to this for each DID I have on my system: exten => 5554441212/_888NXXXXXX,n,Playback(GoAway) Where 15554441212 is one of the DIDs that rings into our Asterisk box. The problem with this approach that I have to create a line like this for every pattern I want to block multiplied by every DID on my system,

Does wildcard "*" character works in asterisk "blacklist"? I have a telemarketing caller who is rotating caller id but they usually start with "V4-something" eg. V40611320600265 I've tried to block using whildcard "*" : /blacklist/V4* : advertising but it doesn't work. -- Joseph

Does anyone know if there is a known list of telemarketers? Something like http://whocalled.us/ with an easier access? We could all benefit if there was such a thing :-) If there is enough interest, I could put up a database that everyone can benefit from. I just need some suggestions on: (1) Adding new numbers based on community responses (some rule to sanity check) (2) Method that everyone

Hello Doug, Friday, December 13, 2019, 11:03:37 AM, you wrote: >> This is exactly what I do - “press 1 for a human” >> Works great > I do this as well, but I also do a database lookup to see if the number > is on our speeddial list and if so, pass the call directly on without > the IVR prompts. I do something similar for calls without caller ID, but I was still getting

Hello-- I've been playing with the privacy options on my home/home-office system since August last year, and have some results, gleaned from my CDR records, which over the last 13 months, number a total of 8672, which includes incoming, as well as outgoing calls. Before I start spitting out numbers, let me note that with the current setup, I haven't had to tell a single telemarketer

Howdy, I've had tinc working great for over a year now. They just made some network changes at work and now I'm only able to make a connection for a few seconds(30) or so before I get a "Metadata socket read error". I wan't to think that's some kind of firewall timeout thing but I'm not sure. I have no control over the FW or network at work so I'm not clear on

I'm curious is it possible to direct a call to an extension that takes you straight to music on hold, but NOT the standard music on hold. The boss suggested something he wondered if it was possible. Example: Someone calls (Telemarketer), we answer tell them to hold while we 'redirect' them to extension (Someone Important) 666 which is a separate music on hold pool of mp3's from

Hi, I have the following requirements I'd like to implement with asterisk: 1. Asterisk notifies interested PC's on the network that there's an incoming call so that the telemarketing app can bring up the customer automagically 2. If a telemarketer makes a call and the customer isn't there and they arrange a callback, the callback is diverted to the originating telemarketers phone

Can someone refresh my memory how to backlist caller ID in asterisk 1.8? I had it working in ver. 1.4 but in 1.8 it changed. -- Joseph

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com > wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I consider reducing the usage of blacklist in sanitizer instrumentation > > passes and doing the necessary work in frontend (Clang) instead. > > > > Some

Hi, How can I strip + from the front of the caller ID? I have tried this: exten => s/_+X.,1,Set(CALLERID(name)=${CALLERID(name):1}) But it is not working. Szasz Szabolcs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100114/a3f18781/attachment.htm

I have 2 asterisk servers - serverA and serverC - connected via IAX2. On serverA, I have a "telemarketer hold" extension which, if I transfer a caller into it, loops around playing music & "please wait" messages, until they give up & hang up the phone. Also on serverA, I have a custom devstate, which lights a lamp on a phone connected to serverA, which tells me if

Hi all, I have the following in my extensions.conf: exten => s,4,GotoIf($["${CALLERID(number)}" = "8585979857" | "8585970327"]?15:5) The numbers listed above are known spammer numbers. However, when I call from any other CALLERID, it still directs me to s,15 which is the Hangup() application. Here are logs from the asterisk CLI: -- Executing

Hi, I consider reducing the usage of blacklist in sanitizer instrumentation passes and doing the necessary work in frontend (Clang) instead. Some of it is already implemented: e.g. Clang will attach an attribute "sanitize_address" to function definition only if this function is not blacklisted. In this case we won't instrument the memory accesses in this function in ASan

does anyone have a recorder GSM file that emulates the Telco's "if you are a telemarketer please hangup now" recording? I don't see one in the sounds dir. the ZapATEller works great for computerized callers but if a human hears this message asking them to go away they have to. Isn't that right? Dave

Hi AJ, Am 06.06.2016 um 10:14 schrieb A J Stiles: > But why not call an AGI script, have this check the caller ID against a MySQL > database and return a status -- blocked or not -- in a variable? Then you can > manage individual number blocking in a much cleaner, more extensible fashion. > > Feel free to ignore me if it sounds like I'm suggesting you walk all the way > to

Dear R-help list: I have two related questions regarding the functions boot.strength and custom.strength in bnlearn. 1) I am using the following commands (on a set of continuous data, the example here run on fake data): > myblacklist<-data.frame(from=c("x1", "x1", "x1", "x2", "x2", "x2")) , to=c("x2",