similar to: Support for PolarSSL?

I've tried my best searching for whether this question has already been posted to tinc listservs, so apologies if this is a repeat question. Is it possible to use tinc with SSL implementations besides OpenSSL, e.g. the PolarSSL or YaSSL/cyassl libraries used on embedded distros like OpenWRT? Thank you. -- Ben West http://gowasabi.net ben at gowasabi.net 314-246-9434 -------------- next

Hi, Is it possible to compile tinc against polarssl ? Perry

I've got a first cut of the rebase here: git://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen out/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC To build it, you'll need to download the polarssl tarball: http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-extfiles/polarssl-1.1.4-gpl.tgz And you'll need a tarball based on (unfortunately) a private tree, which you can find here: git://github.com/gwd/xen base/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC This

This patch ports 5 new applications to the stubdom makefile structure for inclusion into stubdom domains. While these are required for vtpm-stubdom and vtpmmgrdom they could be used with other stubdom applications. -libgmp 4.3.2 -openssl 1.0.0a -polarssl 0.12.1 -berlios tpm_emulator 0.6.1 -vtpm_manager (from the tools directory) Signed off by: Matthew Fioravante

Hi all, I'm wondering if the GPL-2.0 licensed mbedTLS (that's the version in OpenWrt) is 'compatible' with NUT binaries (not including the Python or Perl binaries which aren't used in OpenWrt) which is GPL 2.1+ AIUI. Because mbedTLS is the default library for OpenWrt and NSS is not yet in OpenWrt, and because OpenSSL is considered incompatible (I seem to recall reading that

The default make targets in the top level makefile set DESTDIR which gets applied when the stubdom makefile tries to do a make install within gmp to install libgmp.a to the cross root. Ian, do you want to apply this to your tree and commit the whole thing or would you prefer I roll out a fresh new patch set with all updates applied? Signed-off-by: Matthew Fioravante

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > Although the cryptography is now separated from the rest of the logic in > tinc, it is not really replaceable, since only OpenSSL is supported. > However, there is also a new protocol in tinc 1.1, which uses Ed25519 > and ChaCha-Poly1305. The code for those algorithms is included in tinc, > so the

Hi R-hackers I try to write a batch (in Windows, i have to use!) with Rcmd BATCH D:\Test.R D:\Test.Rout and Rterm.exe --no-restore --no-save < D:\Test.R > D:\Test.Rout. In my file Test.R are any tk-codelines (like: Window1 <- tktoplevel(); ... tkbutton...). It works not interactifly, what is written in Rcmd BATCH --help. Exist there a way to do it all the same? Please help...

So, what''s the deal with all this REST and Resource stuff? Why should I care about it? How does it help me? Why is it cool? Everywhere I see the stuff mentioned, it assumes you already know what it is and why it''s good. Thanks, Joe

>>> What uEFI specification version does your system claim to be compliant with?? I'd like to read over the spec for the call to verify things. -- -Gene <<< I've tried to find the relationship between UseDefaultAddress and DHP relays but I couldn't find anything. The use of DHCP relays should be really transparent... Best, Patrick

Or polarssl ? www.polarssl.org Static link? On 12/28/2014 11:00 AM, Pedro C?rte-Real wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: >> Although the cryptography is now separated from the rest of the logic in >> tinc, it is not really replaceable, since only OpenSSL is supported. >> However, there is also a new protocol in tinc

I would like to upgrade my system to a 64 bit machine. I'd like to find a bare bones platform to build on. I'm not looking to spend a lot of money on this as it is a home system. I looked on the CentOS sponsor page but only saw hosting services. I haven't kept up with hardware in years so I'm dumber than dirt on what's out there. I would prefer a desktop so I can stack it.

I've had it with Dell server garbage. They seem to change RAID controllers as much as I change socks, and then the controllers don't work with Linux, unless you load a new driver. They sell servers with a PCI-e slot in them, but then you get it and find out the RAID controller is using the PCI-e slot! Their sales folks are dumber than rocks, and they change them more often than I

How can I change some parameters in a function of the controller. I have a User_Controller, who''s responsible for update the information fields in the database. The parameters are "id", "firstname" and "lastname". Now, I want to manipulate parameter "lastname", because I would like to add at the end a point. >> Thomas Miller

>>> As noted in the reply to Matt Fleming's initial EFI networking implementation, I think some systems go stupid on UseDefaultAddress and AllowPromiscuous as true.? I just tested and saw no negative results from killing the codelines setting AllowPromiscuous in efi/udp.c on my machines. -- -Gene <<< This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for

i have CentOS 4.5 with OpenLDAP 2.2.13. OpenLDAP contains users with SSHA-ed and CRYPT-ed passwords. the one and ugly thing is that users with CRYPT-ed passwords cannot bind to this LDAP server. however users with SSHA passwords do can. is there any solution without recompiling anyhting? -- Be Secure, Stay Open - live w/ OpenBSD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi All, I have a data frame where a couple of columns are factors, with long and complex names. Everything works ok --in R, but I need to export the data so it can be used on a dumber program (one with a three letters name starting with S...). I know that those complex factor names are causing problems reading the data in from acsv file, so I was thinking of renaming the factors. Problem is, I

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>> So no, your local password quality policy is not purely your own concern. >> >> Other than

I''ve had domU''s hickup a few times with latest unstable, and I guess this can be expected. Is there a procedure in place to report these problems? For exampe: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c12b46c0 printing eip: cpanel cpanel.mydomain c02555f7 *pde = ma 7e9fc067 pa 00002067 *pte = ma 00000000 pa 55555000 Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules

At 01:25 PM 5/13/2020, James Szinger wrote: >On Tue, 12 May 2020 17:42:25 -0700 david <david at daku.org> wrote: > > > Folks > > > > I've been trying to convert my systems to Centos 8, seeing the EOL on > > the horizon a few years away. One of my systems is a Mac-Mini, and > > support for that has been discontinued. I'm wondering what the >