similar to: Possible PAWS security vulnerability

Here's my proposed patch to change RST handling so that ESTABLISHED connections are subject to strict RST checking, but connections in other states are only subject to the "within the window" check. Part 2 of the patch is simply a patch to netstat so that it displays the statistic. As expected, it's very straightforward, the only real question is what to call the statistic...

Forwarded message: > From full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com Wed Apr 21 11:49:12 2004 > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com > From: Darren Bounds <dbounds@intrusense.com> > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] IETF Draft - Fix for TCP vulnerability > Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:19:58 -0400 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > >

Hi, I've encountered a strange problem while using FreeBSD 6.0 for our local mirror (mirror.math.uni-bielefeld.de) and thus is providing access via ftp, http, rsync and cvsup (all local and remote). The system crashes periodically with a kernel panic (panic: sbdrop). The uptimes between two crashes are going from a few hours to a few weeks. The system is a i386, Intel Pentium 4 based with

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > As far as I can see (... well, guess), lpxelinux.0 uses the TCP > implementation under core/lwip/, which doesn't support TCP timestamps. > > Whereas syslinux.efi apparently uses the embedded gpxe/ tree, and that > one uses TCP timestamps. See tcp_xmit() in gpxe/src/net/tcp.c: > > if ( ( flags & TCP_SYN ) || tcp->timestamps

Hello, I'm trying to find out how to pxe boot with syslinux.efi on QEMU with OVMF. After getting through the initial hurdle caused by the iPXE based option ROM included with QEMU having a problem as described in these threads: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-November/022804.html http://sourceforge.net/p/edk2/mailman/message/33236100/ I'm now getting further to almost being able

Any information on when (or if) the following timestamp vulnerability will be fixed for 4.X? Any information would be appreciated. http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/637934 Thanks. Richard Coleman rcoleman@criticalmagic.com

Hi, First of all, I know that not dropping SYN/FIN isn't really a big deal, it just makes no sense. But since it doesn't make any sense, I don't see the reason why not to discard them. I'm running pf on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p3 and I scrub any traffic. I've read some other posts on google and as far as I can tell, clearly invalid packets (like packets with SYN/RST set) is

On 04/07/15 19:22, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to find out how to pxe boot with syslinux.efi on QEMU with > OVMF. After getting through the initial hurdle caused by the iPXE based > option ROM included with QEMU having a problem as described in these > threads: > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-November/022804.html >

Hi everyone, Predictive Analytics World's program for Feb 18-19 in San Francisco (www.predictiveanalyticsworld.com) has grown a bit since my post several weeks ago, and is looking better than ever. The conference covers today's commercial deployment of predictive analytics, across industries and across software vendors. In a nutshell, PAW is a warehouse of case studies. In breaking

Hi R People: I have a question about setClass please. I'm working thru "R Programming for Bioinformatics". Actually, I was wondering if there is such a thing as an updateClass, in order to change a "contains" option, please? that is, if I had setClass("dog", representation(name="character",paws="numeric",tail="character")) Fair

Howdy all, I posted this message to the netfilter mailing-list and didn''t get much response. I apologize if anyone here is getting this for a second time. Anyway, I recently migrated my firewall from a FreeBSD box running ipfilter, ipnat and dummynet to a Gentoo Linux box running netfilter and tc. I have to admit that I''m having problems visualizing tc in my head. So, I was

On 07/18/2018 04:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On 07/18/18 14:36, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/18/2018 01:58 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> >> <snip> >> >>>> But are you guys really telling you think the calendaring / scheduling >>>> for individual users and the main corporate account, etc. .. are >>>>

Hello, I see by the commit logs that the so-called PAWS vulnerability was fixed in -current on April 10. Could you, please, say when a patch will be released? Given the hole's low threat-level, this is not a pressing matter; so if the plan is to wait until the possible tcpdump and gzip issues are investigated and fixed (if necessary) so that a "3 for the price of 1" patch-set is

Hey Peoples, I just got my paws on a KE1020A Phone and all it is doing when I plug it in is: 1201 Wait Login... Sip.conf [1201] type=friend username=1201 secret=<password> host=216.254.10.183 mailbox=1201 context=intern canreinvite=yes dtmfmode=rfc2833 nat=1 register => 1201:<password>@216.254.10.183/1201 One side note, The KE1020A does not have NAT capabilities, but I am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-05:15.tcp Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: TCP connection stall denial of service Category: core Module: inet Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-05:15.tcp Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: TCP connection stall denial of service Category: core Module: inet Announced:

On 19/07/2018 15:57, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > <rant> > As far as google anything goes, not everybody volunteers one's > information into paws of google (and quite likely one or more of 3 > letter agencies collecting information that way). I know (call it > educated guess) that about 70% of messages I send are ending up in > google databases whether I want it or not.

On 07/19/18 09:14, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/18/2018 04:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> >> On 07/18/18 14:36, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/18/2018 01:58 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>> But are you guys really telling you think the calendaring / scheduling >>>>> for