Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "RFC draft for Vorbis over RTP"
2003 Jan 07
3
Vorbis RTP Internet Draft
Hi all,
Below is the Vorbis RTP Internet Draft as sent to the AVT working group
of the IETF.
Comments and feedback is still welcomed from the Vorbis community.
Cheers
Phil
---------------------------8<-----------------8<------------------------
Network Working Group Phil Kerr
Internet-Draft The Ogg Vorbis
January 07, 2003 Community / OpenDrama
2002 Sep 24
5
Floor type 0 and residues type 0 and 1
Hi,
it seems to me as if all vorbis-files only contain floors of type
1 and residues of type 2. Is it possible to "force" the encoder to
somehow create a vorbis-file with the other floor and residue types?
Tor
<p><p><p>===================================================================
EASY and FREE access to your email anywhere: http://Mailreader.com/
2003 Jan 27
3
application/ogg is a proposed Internet standard.
The IETF passed the application/ogg MIME type some days ago. I couldn't
bring you the news earlier because of the MS SQL worm that has been
wreaking havoc all over my local networks.
The IETF wants some clarifications in Silivias draft for the Ogg stream
format, but apart from that I think it will also be passed soon.
The RFC and IANA registration of this mimetype will probably be published
2004 May 29
2
Vorbis over RTP - first attempt
Hi again,
after the discussion the last few days, I started doing some coding and
first of all have a first very simple, quick and dirty demo client:
http://www.j-ogg.de/rtp/index.html
During the coding, I've run into a few problems:
- I was planning to replace the identification header with appropriate
entries in the SDP descriptor. However, the frame sizes are defined here
(why not in
2002 Dec 16
2
Updated Vorbis RTP I-D
Hi all,
Apologies in advance, this email is quite long.
I've prepared an updated Vorbis RTP Internet Draft, which is a
continuation of draft-moffitt-vorbis-rtp-00.txt which can be found
below.
If this new draft gets the ok I'd like to submit this to the AVT WG
later this week.
There are a number of changes over the original I-D, notably the
changing of the M bit function in the RTP
2002 Sep 18
4
Test files for decoder implementation
Hi,
I am trying to implement a Vorbis decoder in Java, and I have some
problems understanding the file-format specification included with
libvorbis. In the header description, there are a few obvious mistakes,
which I believe to have solved, but when I try to decode the audio
packets, the decoded floor and residue data doesn't seem to make
sense at all, and after a few packets, my decoder
2003 Jun 02
2
Normalization of ogg vorbis file
Mandag, 2 juni 2003, skrev du:
>On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 21:22, Vitaly Nechyos wrote:
>This is what people usually want when they say 'normalization'.
AFAIK, you
>can't easily tinker with the vorbis frames to add a scale factor
in the same
>way you can with MP3, but I could be wrong.
I could be wrong too, but if I haven't overseen anything, it should
be possible to
2002 Oct 09
19
high frequencies response
Hi there
In the past, i have used lame to encode high quality mp3-files
(vbr 1, bitrate ~ 192kbit). I tend to switch to ogg with Quality 4
or 5, but i noticed, that many ogg-files tend to produce too much
high frequencies response. In many cases, this is very noticeable.
For my opinion, i cannot accept this worse frequence reponse.
I have used latest version of ogg (OggEnc v1.0, precompiled
2002 Oct 09
19
high frequencies response
Hi there
In the past, i have used lame to encode high quality mp3-files
(vbr 1, bitrate ~ 192kbit). I tend to switch to ogg with Quality 4
or 5, but i noticed, that many ogg-files tend to produce too much
high frequencies response. In many cases, this is very noticeable.
For my opinion, i cannot accept this worse frequence reponse.
I have used latest version of ogg (OggEnc v1.0, precompiled
2009 Feb 27
5
ietf discussion about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg,
Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are
all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org)
dedicated to latest discussion about the draft.
I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation
still required to the ietf
2002 Oct 28
6
Carrying non-audio data in an Ogg/Vorbis I stream
Hello,
I would like to "piggy-back" other data in an Ogg/Vorbis I physical stream
(i.e. file) in a manner that does not conflict with specifications and
existing decoders/players/editors etc.
As far as I can see, I have some possible choices:
1 - Chaining a logical bistream at the end. If this is the way to go, two
questions arise to begin with:
q1a - How to identify this stream in a
2003 Jun 05
1
Updated Vorbis-RTP Internet Draft
Hi All,
Please find below an updated Vorbis-RTP Internet Draft document for
review and discussion at the Xiph IRC meeting on Saturday.
The changes in this version have been:
Codebook caching mechanism
Expanded SDP parameters
Expanded MIME section
Expanded introduction
Packet loss section
Minor tweaks and clarity changes to text
There are probably some minor tweaks to the formatting needed
2000 Nov 20
4
Vorbis over RTP
Hi.
I got bored of writing papers last week so I decided to write an app for
sending and receiving multicast vorbis streams over RTP. A first version
is available here:
http://www.cdt.luth.se/~rolle/vorbis/
(I use the JOrbis decoder, so you need Java 2 with Javasound, e.g.
JDK1.3. Since the decoding is done in Java, you probably need at least
300-350 MHz. Works with the IBM JDK1.3 on Linux on a
2000 Nov 20
4
Vorbis over RTP
Hi.
I got bored of writing papers last week so I decided to write an app for
sending and receiving multicast vorbis streams over RTP. A first version
is available here:
http://www.cdt.luth.se/~rolle/vorbis/
(I use the JOrbis decoder, so you need Java 2 with Javasound, e.g.
JDK1.3. Since the decoding is done in Java, you probably need at least
300-350 MHz. Works with the IBM JDK1.3 on Linux on a
2001 Feb 22
3
rtp payload format
http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/draft-moffitt-vorbis-rtp-00.txt
This is the Internet-Draft I'll be submitting tomorrow and hopefully
presenting at the March IETF meeting.
If you see anything major, let me know right away, I'll be submitting
this in the morning.
jack.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To
2007 May 30
5
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC.
Check http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments
That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to
release additional rights". To follow that guideline a
section like the following should be added:
x. Copying conditions
The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable
right to
2003 Aug 05
4
OggSplit 0.1.0
Hello again!
As promised, here's a completed package of OggSplit. It's configured
with autoconf and automake (use autogen.sh) and there are debian build
rules. In it's current state it's quite useable, although there are
certain internal things which could be improved (nothing critical
however).
There are of course bugs, so I encourage everyone to try breaking the
tool with
2001 Oct 18
4
libvorbisrtp-0.1
alpha. (that about sums it up)
Will encode and play back via an sdp file and multicast on one
computer (over the net if you transfer the sdp file over by hand).
rc/rtenc3 and src/rtdec3 are in the style of encoder/decoder_example
...so this means you MUST edit it them to suit your system. For example,
I specify my rtenc3 to multicast just on eth1 (to avoid pissing off
my cable supplier on
2002 Sep 23
2
More errors in the file format specification Was: Test files for decoder implementation
Hi,
I've found some more errors in the file format specification (or
at least points, where the specification and actual libvorbis implementation
mismatch):
- Floor 1 / curve computation / step 1: amplitude value synthesis
21) vector [floor1_final_Y] element [i] =
[predicted] - (([val] - 1) divided by 2 using integer division)
hould be:
21) vector [floor1_final_Y] element [i] =
2002 Oct 15
5
Specification change requests
Hi,
as Conrad suggested, I've made a complete list of all points in the
specification, which I beleive are errors, or where the explanation
is unclear, contains unneccessary steps and so on.
I hope someone has time to look through the points and if and when
accepting or rejecting them be so very kind and inform me about it.
I will also once again try to work through the residue