similar to: RECORDNUMBER

I am no longer able to access CVS: Logging in to :pserver:anoncvs@xiph.org:2401/usr/local/cvsroot cvs [login aborted]: recv() from server xiph.org: Connection reset by peer I had no problems a few days ago. -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- XNS : =David K Gasaway -:-:- Email: dave@gasaway.org -:-:- Web : dave.gasaway.org <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives:

Has anyone compiled the ogg and vorbis libraries with borlands c compiler (bcc32)? If so, are there any makefiles or similar available which can make it easier for me to do the same? /Erik <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org'

vcomment.c contains this line: fprintf(stderr, "Vorbiscomment " VERSION "\n"); I can't figure how / where VERSION is defined. <p> -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- XNS : =David K Gasaway -:-:- Email: dave@gasaway.org -:-:- Web : dave.gasaway.org <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:

Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > On Monday 17. September 2007 07:47:19 David K. Gasaway wrote: >> Even today, I use my own "metadata format" -- essentially a superset of >> vorbis comments. There is one file per release, even with a multi-disc >> release. As a final part of the ripping process, I apply this metadata >> to the FLAC or Vorbis files. > > Why

On 16 Sep 2007 at 22:10, Ralph Giles wrote: > These applications are complementary. Many music players do have their > own database, and it makes sense to keep metadata there, if only as a > cache. It is also to have metadata in the file itself, so that when it > is moved, copied, posted for download by others, or just indexed by > another music player instance it is easily

On 10 Sep 2007 at 18:42, Ian Malone wrote: > Classical music is a rich source of examples; works are > most often associated with a composer but you may still > care who the performers or conductors were. A piece may > be split across several movements which may be even further > broken down into tracks on the source. This things are easily solved with vorbis comments ...

On 15 Sep 2007 at 16:53, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Skeleton, CMML and Vorbiscomment are not sufficient for some people - > in particular when there is a more complex piece of metadata to be > communicted, e.g. from an archive that stores a lot more information > than just name-value pairs. In my opinion, for this purpose it would be more appropriate to store the data separate from

On 14 Sep 2007 at 15:52, Ian Malone wrote: > Vorbis comments could do better than they currently do > but no-one seems compelled to implement any of the exotic > tag proposals that have hung around for years. Exotic tag proposals?! Do you mean the ones linked from the wiki? As far can tell, the only roadblock to "implementation" (by which, I assume you mean support from

On 9 Sep 2007 at 23:11, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > To me, Vorbis comments are insufficient. Ask anyone playing in an ensamble > if they would like recognition. Ask the record label holding the rights to > a song. Ask the music geek that wants his music collection sorted by > something other than artist, album, or release year. They would all prefer > this to Vorbis comments.

Hello everybody, today I had some time to test Peter´s decoding plugin on a very slow machine. My setup: - Pentium "classic" @ 50 MHz (underclocked!) - Mainboard with Mercury Chipset (I think) - CD-ROM and HDD in PIO-Mode (CPU intensive) - MAD16 Soundcard (ISA slot, CPU intensive) - Win95B, Winamp 2.76, Decoder Plugin 1.16 (RC 2) The hardware setup is something like the

Hello folks, This is a periodic mailing of the FAQ[1] for the various xiph.org mailing lists. Hopefully, this FAQ will preemptively answer questions some posters have. [1] In this case FAQ == Frequently Answered Questions. We answer 'em before you ask 'em. They're not rules, they're just the way it works. 1) Do not send subscribe/unsubscribe messages to the list; they'll

Hello folks, This is a periodic mailing of the FAQ[1] for the various xiph.org mailing lists. Hopefully, this FAQ will preemptively answer questions some posters have. [1] In this case FAQ == Frequently Answered Questions. We answer 'em before you ask 'em. They're not rules, they're just the way it works. 1) Do not send subscribe/unsubscribe messages to the list; they'll

Hello folks, This is a periodic mailing of the FAQ[1] for the various xiph.org mailing lists. Hopefully, this FAQ will preemptively answer questions some posters have. [1] In this case FAQ == Frequently Answered Questions. We answer 'em before you ask 'em. They're not rules, they're just the way it works. 1) Do not send subscribe/unsubscribe messages to the list; they'll

Hello folks, This is a periodic mailing of the FAQ[1] for the various xiph.org mailing lists. Hopefully, this FAQ will preemptively answer questions some posters have. [1] In this case FAQ == Frequently Answered Questions. We answer 'em before you ask 'em. They're not rules, they're just the way it works. 1) Do not send subscribe/unsubscribe messages to the list; they'll

Hi- i'm kinda busy doing other stuff at college to read through the mailing list properly, but i read somewhere before that midi data embeded in ogg vorbis files could be used to control lighting stuff. The lighting desk at college has a midi input to control most of the lighting functions. Its also right next to the sound desk. So i was wondering, if it is possible to stick midi data into

Hello, I'm not quite sure if this is the right list for my questions, please excuse if it isn't. 1. While using vorbislib (Win2K/Borland C++ Builder 5), I'm getting reproducible floating point exceptions at lots of sample rate/bit rate combinations. For example, the original encoder_example.c, with just the initialization line changed to

I downloaded a nightly CVS tarball about a week ago. It contains an oggdec tool in vorbis-tools. However, I don't get this tool when I checkout / update from CVS. What's the deal - is it in CVS or isn't it?! :) -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- XNS : =David K Gasaway -:-:- Email: dave@gasaway.org -:-:- Web : dave.gasaway.org <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives:

On 11 Sep 2007 at 9:15, Ian Malone wrote: > You can put the comments in, but they're not supported > anywhere. The existence of a spec which explicitly > provides for them from the start (rather than a page > in some corner of the internet) might help change that. I couldn't agree with you more - I've said it *many* times myself. :) Look, people seem to be getting the

On Saturday 08. September 2007 19:11:54 Carsten Haese wrote: > On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 17:08 +0200, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > > I feel that these ?Vorbis comments? are not sufficient. There is not > > even a standard for their field names. > > Actually, there is: http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html No standard. But ?Below is a proposed, minimal list of standard field

On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:55:04PM +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > All capitalised tags are the result of an MB automatic > tagging tool. The MB one includes all the uuids, but > also pulls in a 'sortname'. (Incidentally the album name > had been added when encoding, I suspect that's why it was > unmodified.) > Despite UUIDs there's an acknowledgement > here