Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80000 matches similar to: "CVS question"
2002 Jun 21
1
AW: diskspace; was: When will quality increase be unnoti cable?
Yes, you can: whenever you are unable to make a decent backup at least once
a week, your diskspace must be considered to big.
Friedrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Per Wigren [mailto:wigren@home.se]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2002 07:37
An: vorbis@xiph.org
Betreff: Re: [vorbis] When will quality increase be unnoticable?
<p>Friday 21 June 2002 01.33 skrev Øyvind Stegard:
>
2001 Aug 20
3
extremely noticeable artifact (britney-bug)
I really don't know if this is the same problem that was reported by Ingo
Saitz (I really couldn't say which one was 128kbit and which was the
original wav when blind-testing. The original had some distortion that
perhaps does somehting with my cheapo soundcard) but here's a description
of what i've found:
When doing some sample encoding with rc2 (rebuilt rpm with latest redhat
2001 Sep 27
2
Icecast2 in xiph CVS, PATCH!
Hi! Here are some patches to the CVS (ices) that I made to
get my radio webinterface with songselection-support
working.
To make the log update (flush) each time something is
written (before the patch it flushes only when you quit):
---- CUT ----
Index: log.c
============================================================
=======
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/log/log.c,v
retrieving revision
2001 Aug 24
3
RECORDNUMBER
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I am going to encode almost 2000(!) CDs to OGG soon and I will use the tag
RECORDNUMBER (as opposed to TRACKNUMBER) to indicate which record in a
multi-cd-album it is. Maybe I'll also use the tag RECORDNAME if the record
also has a name (eg Nine Inch Nails/Fragile's records are called Left and
Right).
Please make this tag (at least
2001 Sep 04
3
I hate myself for asking this, but...
I'm going to encode ~2000 CDs soon. All genres, but 90% of it has distorted
guitars... Everything from punkrock to metal to industrial to goth to
synthpop to classical to techno to whatever...
I've heard that RC2 has some hearable artifacts, even in 192/256 kbps...
There have been quite a few "bugreports" since RC2 with people sending
samples that even I can differ from the
2001 Sep 10
1
My little tools, if you're interested... :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I made these nifty pythonscripts to make my ripping+encoding+sorting easier.
They are designed to use in Grip.
w_oggenc:
Call this instead of oggenc in Grip with the command-line:
"%A" "%d" "%t" "%a" "%n" "%y" "%G" "%i"
Now you can put additional info in the
2001 Sep 27
2
nightly cvs?
I wanted to ask if it is safe to encode my files with encoder compiled from nightly CVS archive?
--
Pagarbiai, Algirdas Kepeþinskas
[algis@kitoks.lt] [QQuxa@irc.delfi.lt] [UIN 14187537]
/ Padariau zodyje MAMA keturias klaidas... gavosi ALUS /
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message
2001 Oct 25
1
MP3PRO
And thats only a player. What about an (Open Source) encoder? Nah, I'll
stick with OGG for the time being.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark de Bokx
Internet Service Engineer
ICT Communication and Media Services
PlanetMediaGroup
the Netherlands
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty not safety." --Benjamin Franklin
2001 Nov 08
1
What kind of Ogg Vorbis-services you would like to
> * Here is the most innovative idea here:
>
> Have collobarative playlist editing abilities
(conference). I don't think
> this has ever been done. Imagine 3 people going on a
picnic. Each one
> has a portable player. They connect to their music
collection, decide
> together which songs they want to take with them, divide
them among the
> portables and load them
2001 Oct 17
2
Ogg FLAC
>Kenneth Arnold wrote:
>For all that verbosity, my proposition is a simple
>question: what is the mimimum set of changes needed to make a killer
>editing format out of Ogg, and are those modifications small enough
>that streaming-Ogg and editing-Ogg can be unified such that one is
>just a special case of another? I think this is an important concern
>that is best addressed
2002 Jan 14
9
ReplayGain support for Vorbis
Hello all,
I'm glad to announce to you that Vorbis now has full
ReplayGain support. If you're not familiar with ReplayGain,
take a look at www.replaygain.org. The main features are:
a) all songs play back with equal loudness
b) removes the need for normalization
c) allows for clipping prevention
Using it is very simple. Get a compatible decoder (ogg123,
XMMS and WinAmp all support it
2002 Feb 12
2
APPLAUD.WAV problems
Hi!
I am very pleased with the progress that Ogg is making, expecially after I
read the latest comparision tests on
http://ff123.net/128test/instruct.html
that put OGG on top aside with MPC.
BUT the APPLAUD.WAV test case
( http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/applaud.wav )
still produces **VERY** easily audible high-frequency artifacts when encoded
with OGG RC3 up to q4.9 (!!!). Things
2001 Aug 31
3
LAME guys are making improvements, too
Hello all,
it seems that at least some of the points that make OGG Vorbis
superior to MP3 will be eliminated (I still prefer OGG :)
Roel VdB wrote to [MP3encoder] list:
-------------------------><8---------CUT HERE--------------------------
I hope Gabriel commits Jons complete LAME Tag code soon to the CVS.
The LAME tag would makes all CBR(>=64kbit/s)/ABR/VBR LAME files have
+
2001 Sep 03
2
OggEnc help file
----------
> Van: ORK <korsmo@solungen.hm.no>
> Aan: vorbis@xiph.org
> Onderwerp: [vorbis] OggEnc help file
> Datum: maandag 3 september 2001 18:21
>
> Somebody asked how to use OggEnc a while ago.
>
> OggEnc v0.8 (libvorbis rc2)
> (c) 2001 Michael Smith <msmith@labyrinth.net.au)
>
> Usage: oggenc [options] input.wav [...]
LOL!
--- >8 ----
List
2001 Sep 28
2
MMX/3dNow! etc
Hi,
I´m new on this list so I really don´t know that kind of questions have
been asked, but here I go.
Is the current ogg plug-ins using any mmx or 3dnow! instructions? Is there
any performance to gain?
I know that most of the mp3-decoders uses mmx/3dnow! to decode mp3streams
so in theory it would
be applyable to ogg to...?
Just a thought...
Regards,
Andreas Karlsson
hermes@home.se
2001 Oct 06
1
State of CVS?
Hi:
A friend of mine wants to know whether to update to CVS. Last I heard,
CVS was only encoding at 128kbps mode, but this was a few weeks back. More
recently though, Monty alluded to problems he was having with the libs. So
what's the current status?
Geoff.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from
2002 Jan 19
2
some EAQUAL results
For those who are interested, I've run 3 EAQUAL tests on both the LAME and
OGG encoders: LAME with the --alt-standard preset (with and without
--nspsytune) and OGGENC (RC3) with -q 6 (my personal "sweet spot")
I am somewhat unsure though about the validity of these tests, since the
original and decoded files were not the same size (2 KB difference). The LAME
encoded files were also
2001 Sep 13
3
split an ogg file
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
A question, is it possible to split a ogg-vorbis file in two parts without
reencoding? I want is to make a utility to scan a vorbis file for 30seconds+
of silence, split the file to two files and call the second file "Bonus
track" or something... It's annoying to have the last song of an album being
30minutes with 26 minutes of
2001 Aug 21
2
Title formatting for players/plugins
Hi, Peter Pawlowski's new (1.15beta) winamp decoder plugin seems quite
nice, in my opinion..
The "title formatting logic" is what I've been dreaming of for ages..
Right now I've chosen "%artist / [[%[abbr20]album][-%[num2]tracknumber]
/ ]%title[ - %version]"
I get titles such as "Artist / Title"or "Artist / Album / Title" or
"Artist /
2001 Oct 25
2
FAQ correction
The FAQ says (at its very end):
> Does Vorbis support mid/side stereo modes? More than stereo?
>
> Vorbis has hooks for mid/side stereo and continuous balance stereo,
> but the channel mappings for both are yet to be formally specified and
> implemented. Currently, Vorbis channels are uncoupled.
>
This should be updated so that people know how good is Vorbis :)
> Vorbis does