similar to: RE: Hlp in finding a native Ogg trim, fade & nomalise tool

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "RE: Hlp in finding a native Ogg trim, fade & nomalise tool"

2002 Oct 01
1
RE: Hlp in finding a native Ogg trim, fade & nomalise tool
ReplayGain is not much good for FM broadcasting, and debatable for streaming too. There is a limit on the peak volume that can be broadcast on an FM signal so it is best to have a song volume of 100% broadcast with 100% FM deviation. If an average song volume is very low, for example, but has some loud peaks in it, ReplayGain will increase the volume to the extent that the peaks will be way too
2002 Oct 01
0
RE: Hlp in finding a native Ogg trim, fade & nomalise tool
John Morton wrote: > ReplayGain enabled players usually have some sort of clipping > management for just that sort of thing. Doesn't that help? I just had to study what the clipping prevention option does in the Winamp plug-in - http://www.xs4all.nl/~walterln/replaygain/dsp_replaygain.txt. I thought it was simply preventing clipping of the original waveform (ogg file). I see now that
2002 Oct 01
1
Re: BOUNCE vorbis@xiph.org
Majordomo rejected the subject line beginning with 'Help'. <p>> From: John K Muir <jkmuir@trentu.ca> > Subject: Help in finding a native Ogg trim, fade & nomalise tool > > My specific interest lies in a project which involves the digital ingest of about > 13,000 CDs, 8000 LPs and various and sundry other tape and disc formats > into a online intranet
2007 Sep 16
2
metadata on the wiki
On 14 Sep 2007 at 15:52, Ian Malone wrote: > Vorbis comments could do better than they currently do > but no-one seems compelled to implement any of the exotic > tag proposals that have hung around for years. Exotic tag proposals?! Do you mean the ones linked from the wiki? As far can tell, the only roadblock to "implementation" (by which, I assume you mean support from
2018 Dec 11
2
New ID registration
Hi Martjn, and everyone, Apologies if I have missed the reply, but I think I have not got any comment so far on this. That means our new ID request is accepted? What should I do next to proceed?? Apparently this is my first time here, so appreciate any advice assistance. Best regards, Taku From: Kurosawa, Taku Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 8:41 PM To: 'Martijn van Beurden'
2014 Jun 16
3
R128gain & metaflac
I mention metaflac because there are a few shell scripts that use it to write RG tags in a flac music library on Linux. With support for Ebu R128 gain in metaflac (the calculation according to specification, not an external program) it would be easy to use, just change the cmd line for metaflac in the script. Now that metaflac supports sample rates higher than 48kHz this would be a good thing in
2002 Jan 14
9
ReplayGain support for Vorbis
Hello all, I'm glad to announce to you that Vorbis now has full ReplayGain support. If you're not familiar with ReplayGain, take a look at www.replaygain.org. The main features are: a) all songs play back with equal loudness b) removes the need for normalization c) allows for clipping prevention Using it is very simple. Get a compatible decoder (ogg123, XMMS and WinAmp all support it
2014 Jun 15
3
R128gain & metaflac
Hi has anyone looked at adding R128gain code to metaflac so we can select to use this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain? Best regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140615/1c1ca9c9/attachment.htm
2018 Nov 14
3
New ID registration
Hi, Martijn, Thank you for reaching out, and apologies for late reply It is a dedicated metadata for volume normalization on our player. Please kindly refer to our company information here: https://labelgate.com/ application ID: SONN application name: Sony Normalizer contact e-mail address: taku.kurosawa at labelgate.com<mailto:taku.kurosawa at labelgate.com> Taku From: flac-dev
2014 Jun 19
2
R128gain & metaflac
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:39:12 -0700 "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: >Ian Nartowicz wrote: >> The Opus replaygain spec is fundamentally broken, so let's ignore that for >> now. It is discussed ad nauseam elsewhere, but isn't going to change any >> time soon. > >I haven't seen anyone make any concrete proposals for how it
2014 Jun 18
2
R128gain & metaflac
>The use of R128 also raises the question about "REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS" >tag. Currently flac/metaflac writes "REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=89.0 dB" >but doesn't use it when decoding (it seems that nothing uses this tag). >R128 defines reference level differently, so this tag makes little sense for >it. IMHO it's better not to write this tag when
2020 Mar 19
3
Icecast source client with web request/voting for next to play function
Hi all! Thank you for having me. I'm a person who encourage a small local community for musical involvement. It already kinda worked, we are doing plenty of fantastic things together. What I am now thinking of is 24/7 Internet radio based on Icecast that will air all of their non-professional music I gathered. Functions I'm looking for: - frequent scanning of music directory to update
2004 Jan 22
1
Calculation of normalised red and green intensities
Dear Sir/Madam, I could succesfully normalise my microarray data using marrayNorm package. However, i have not been able to get normalised red and green channel intensities through R package. Is there a possibility to write a formula to calculate back the red and green channel intensities after normalisation of the data. Do I need to incorporate this formula in my R script? I am biologist
2002 Jan 22
2
Peak value
Hi, While testing ReplayGain (so it could be related to a bug), I noticed the following gain comments for a file: RG_PEAK=1.71580 RG_RADIO=-7.91 dB RG_AUDIOPHILE=-6.72 dB I've never seen such a large peak. Not that I've looked much, nor have I analyzed the file further. I just thought I should mention it. :) The file is the track Board Burner by Mixmaster Mike, available at:
2010 Jan 04
2
vorbis-tools release soon?
Since it's been almost 2 years since vorbis-tools 1.2.0 was released, would it be reasonable to see 1.3.0 soon? There are plenty of changes in there that deserve to see the light of day - the ReplayGain support in ogg123 and the vcut fixes in particular have my attention.
2002 Dec 23
2
normalising vorbis
Hi Guys, I've done some line recordings, and to save space compressed straight to vorbis, and as such have no access to the original. Upon listening, I found the volume to be quite quiet and I am wondering if there exists a native vorbis normaliser, so I don't have to decompress to wave, normalise and recompress. Does anybody know of such a beast? I'm aware of
2002 Jul 04
2
CVS access
I am no longer able to access CVS: Logging in to :pserver:anoncvs@xiph.org:2401/usr/local/cvsroot cvs [login aborted]: recv() from server xiph.org: Connection reset by peer I had no problems a few days ago. -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- XNS : =David K Gasaway -:-:- Email: dave@gasaway.org -:-:- Web : dave.gasaway.org <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives:
2002 Jun 27
2
Borland compiler
Has anyone compiled the ogg and vorbis libraries with borlands c compiler (bcc32)? If so, are there any makefiles or similar available which can make it easier for me to do the same? /Erik <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org'
2002 Jul 12
1
vcomment question
vcomment.c contains this line: fprintf(stderr, "Vorbiscomment " VERSION "\n"); I can't figure how / where VERSION is defined. <p> -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- XNS : =David K Gasaway -:-:- Email: dave@gasaway.org -:-:- Web : dave.gasaway.org <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:
2007 Sep 17
2
The use for an XML based metadata format
Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > On Monday 17. September 2007 07:47:19 David K. Gasaway wrote: >> Even today, I use my own "metadata format" -- essentially a superset of >> vorbis comments. There is one file per release, even with a multi-disc >> release. As a final part of the ripping process, I apply this metadata >> to the FLAC or Vorbis files. > > Why