Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Stream integrity ?"
2002 Jan 22
1
ogginfo integrity tests
After accidentally ogginfo-ing a WAV file, I'm wondering if there's
any reason I shouldn't commit my fix that breaks out of the current
file test if header integrity fails.
Is there any case where the header integrity will fail but there is
still any useful information to get out of the stream? I don't think
so...
--
Kenneth Arnold <ken@arnoldnet.net>
- "Know
2002 Feb 11
3
Seeking in a saved stream; or,Why isn't that sucker valid?
>> Running ogginfo on the stream data gives:
>> stream_integrity=fail
>This line in the ogginfo output concerns me. It means that there are actually
>damaged Ogg packets in the stream. How are you saving this stream to disk?
This particular one was obtained with wget on OpenBSD. I've observed the same problem with files saved from Winamp.
>I think there is a problem
2002 Feb 11
2
Seeking in a saved stream; or, Why isn't that sucker valid?
I hope that this is the appropriate venue for this question. If it's not, let me know and I'll take it elsewhere (perhaps vorbis-dev).
Saved streams are great - it lets this norteamericano get his fill of BBC Radio 1's Essential Mix. Unfortunately, saved streams aren't seekable. Running ogginfo on the stream data gives:
erial=1626603590
header_integrity=pass
vendor=Xiphophorus
2002 Feb 11
2
Seeking in a saved stream; or, Why isn't that sucker valid?
I hope that this is the appropriate venue for this question. If it's not, let me know and I'll take it elsewhere (perhaps vorbis-dev).
Saved streams are great - it lets this norteamericano get his fill of BBC Radio 1's Essential Mix. Unfortunately, saved streams aren't seekable. Running ogginfo on the stream data gives:
erial=1626603590
header_integrity=pass
vendor=Xiphophorus
2002 Feb 11
4
Seeking in a saved stream; or,Why isn't thatsucker valid?
>>I realize that I may have unintentionally been misleading you by leaving some information out. That error report from
ogginfo keeps going, repeating the same 3 errors (as above) over and over again. It ends after a
stream_truncated=true, not giving a final header_integrity=fail. (Perhaps because there's not another packet?) Then it
reports a total playtime of 0.
>
>Yes,
2001 Aug 07
4
Some pre-RC1 listening tests
Hello everyone,
ff123 compiled Monty's branch of the RC1 encoder, see his post on
r3mix.net forum:
http://66.96.216.160/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?board=c&action=display&num=994299736&start=30
Anyway it only supports ~128kbps mode, so I did a quick listening
test with some files that bugged vorbis beta4.
grace.wav - the right channel is still a bit watery, and I think this
can be seen
2001 Feb 25
2
Few questions concerning clipping
I noticed that clipping occurs in lossy audio compression even
if there is no clipping in the original file (though the original
file has peaks that are just below the maximum). I know
that this happens due to all the filtering involved during compression,
but I'm wondering just how audible this clipping is because I don't
hear anything wrong. I mean, as things are now, is it safe to say
2001 Jul 27
6
A killer clip
Check this clip (it's small, 373kb)
http://www.geocities.com/jdxss/udialwav.zip
It left oggenc, lame and MP+ encoders choking in dust.
--
Vorbis Xtreme | http://solair.eunet.yu/~aldov/
Ogg Vorbis is the free, open source alternative to MP3
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a
2001 Apr 26
1
From LAME mailing list
Comments?
----------------------------------------
"Mark Taylor" <mt@sulaco.org> wrote:
[...]
> This is related to one minor objection I have to vector quantization
> based codecs like Vorbis and the MPEG4 VQ codec: they do not compute
> the quantization noise during the encoding process. The choice of
> codebooks (use a big codebook: low quantization noise, use a
2000 May 29
4
One important thing
Hi.
Since I'm new to this mailing list, I don't know whether this was discussed
in this mailing list, or if it is already fixed.
Anyway, the problem is that all audio encoders out there add a small amount
of silence to the start/end of the encoded file. This is usually a small
amount, around 0.03 seconds. Most of the time it goes unnoticed, BUT when
you have tracks that flow into one
2001 May 30
3
Lossless/lossy hybrid?
Monkey's Audio lossless compressor (currently win32 only, free but not
open-source except decoder) author is thinking to implement a kind of
audiophile-quality lossy compression which would filter "noise bits" that
are hard to encode lossless but which are (or should be) inaudible and thus
improve lossless compression (avg. 300-450kbps). I think that implementing
something like this
2002 Aug 09
1
Odd broken oggs ...
I have a CD ripped with RC2, ogginfo from 1.0 claims they are all
"broken". ogg123 also goes a little wild with them. I'll experiment a
little more, maybe play with xmms, etc. RC3's ogginfo do not see anything
wrong with them... an example:
---------- ogginfo 1.0
New logical stream (#1, serial: 2aab0567): type vorbis
Vorbis headers parsed for stream 1, information follows...
2001 Mar 19
1
[Fwd: Re: File formats (RE: MP4 Player Available for Download)]
---- "Aleksandar Dovnikovic" <aldov@EUnet.yu> wrote:
> I think that AAC wasn't developed to be used as 'another'
> MP3, it's usage is focused towards companies that sell audio
> over the internet, for portable players, satellite communications...
A-ha! That explains a lot. There used to be a project called FAAC but
I presume it's gone. After seeing
2001 Aug 14
1
udial.wav problem
I was doing some testing with RC2 and I noticed that RC2 doesn't
encode past 19kHz with this clip (-b256 and -b350). There are no
problems with this clip like it was before, but this clip contains
signal past 19kHz which is audible as a faint high-frequency hiss -
and that hiss is gone in the encoded file since RC2 cuts off at 19kHz.
I think that -b256 and -b350 should encode at least up to
2001 Oct 01
1
RC3 ?
I couldn't catch Monty on IRC, so I'll ask here...
how's RC3 coming along? Can we expect RC3 anytime
soon, and what are the main improvements over RC2?
--
Vorbis Xtreme | http://solair.eunet.yu/~aldov/
Ogg Vorbis - free, open source audio
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com
---
2001 Mar 22
2
The Recording Industry's Secret Weapon Exposed
Check this out: http://7amnews.com/2001/features/032101.shtml
Greetings,
Aleksandar
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list
2000 Aug 31
2
New WinAMP 3.0
Hi.
Winamp version 3.0 has been announced. There will be no public beta and
final version is expected for Christmas. Winamp 3.0 will be completely
re-written version, but current plug-ins and skins (for winamp 2.x) will
NOT be compatible with Winamp 3 (though this will be addressed in later
winamp 3 versions).
More info: http://www.winamp.com/nsdn/winamp3x/
Anyway, the reason I'm sending
2001 Mar 01
2
Pre-echo like noises on Beta4
Hi, there.
Although I'm not a hacker at all, I noticed an audible noise on Beta
4 encoded files. So, I'd like to report it here.
I ripped and encoded 'A Day Without Rain' on the album with the same
name By Enya into Vorbis using Oggenc and Oggdrop Beta 4 from the Vorbis
site. (You know, she is quite an encoder-killer.) At all the bitrates,
files encoded by Oggdrop had audible
2001 Aug 13
3
RC2 on slashdot.org
In case you missed it, RC2 is on slashdot.org too:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/08/13/1811241
BTW Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote on /. that RC3 should appear
very soon (in a week or so)?
Also, it looks like Wall Street Journal article is not available
on-line (at least to non-registered persons). If someone is registered
or have a paper edition, please post this article somewhere so that we
2001 Feb 27
2
Cascading?
During the interesting interview that binaryfreedom has made with Monty
and Jack, Monty mentions cascading, a feature that will be added, quote:
"Cascading is the ability to make multiple passes through the frequency
spectrum, iteratively filling in more detail, like a progressive jpeg".
What are the advantages of something like this - does this generally
improves quality or is it used