similar to: Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch"

2007 Oct 26
1
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Michael Rock napsal(a): > all-generic-ide irqpoll > > Without irqpoll it just hangs and without > all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still > need both to recognize the disk and continue booting. > Michael, > I have tested 8.1.14 ICH9 x86_64 version and it's kring fine. For sure > im right now uploading full DVD isos. I did not want to :o( due due to >
2007 Oct 24
1
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
btw - I installed your x86_64 rpms that has the ich9 patch directly on that box but it still will not boot without all the options. --- Michael Rock <mikerocks65 at yahoo.com> wrote: > > David wrote: > > Now there are right md5sums and even > > x86_64 iso.delta. > > David > > I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO > but I notice it fails on
2007 Oct 27
1
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Oops sorry, ugh another poor selection of words as I meant to say "When I saw the rest of my post snipped, I then realized that last request sounds really bad, which was not my intention. > When you snip the rest of my post man that last > request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I > saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and > thought I would
2015 Mar 24
2
Re: machine='pc-q35-2.1' and sata controller
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:36:33 -0400 John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote: > > Are the needed patches in 2.3.0-rc0? > > Is it possible to backport AHCI migration to RHEL 7.1 qemu or will it be too much work? > > The patches that improve the stability of AHCI migration are in 2.3-rc0. > We still have not /enabled/ migration upstream, but editing to code to > allow it
2007 Oct 24
0
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Michael Rock napsal(a): > Hi Dave, > > I am using applydeltaiso with your delta and > CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso 4,186,786 bytes from one > of the Centos mirrors. But the block size is wrong and > does not match the image length. > > So I checked the md5 on your delta and it does not > match your md5.txt file. I downloaded it again to be > sure. > > Your
2007 Oct 26
1
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Hi all, I've the same problem, I've download the CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso from one centos mirror, i've applied deltaiso and the created image is 2 GB, the md5sum check of iso.delta (CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta) is ok, what's wrong ? deltaiso program exit on the same as Michael , maybe I've downloaded the worng DVD 64 bit iso version? do you know any good
2007 Oct 24
0
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
> David wrote: > Now there are right md5sums and even > x86_64 iso.delta. > David I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO but I notice it fails on applying. kdnssd-avahi-devel.i386: copying unchanged payload kernel-xen.x86_64 (???): applying delta new payload open failed __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
2007 Oct 27
0
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
> WELCOME TO MY WORLD :D > (Hey, are the new foobar packages done, how about the xwyz packages) > Thanks, > JOhnny Hughes When you snip the rest of my post man that last request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and thought I would ask. I really do not want to put anyone out and please do not go through any
2014 Mar 08
1
Loss of network connectivity | kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Greetings all, Running CentOS 6.5 x86_64 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64. (already booting with the irqpoll option in grub) Every few months I lose network connectivity and have to restart the server: in /var/log/messages: " Mar 7 18:54:21 backup03 kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Mar 7 18:54:21 backup03 kernel: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted
2007 Oct 22
4
Centos 5.0 Intel G33/P35 Chipset Support (Asus P5K-VM, P5KC)
I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has support for these chipsets be available on any on a Centos mirror? Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum yet? Here are my latest results with these chipsets and Centos 5.1 1. Asus P5K, E6850, P35 Chipset: Does not
2008 Jan 09
1
irq 9: nobody cared(try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Hi I am getting the error : irq 9: nobody cared(try booting with the "irqpoll" option) before a kernel panic and the server reboots. Fresh installation of CentOS 5.1. I selected the virtualisation option for install and was presented with the xen kernel upon reboot. however the error mentioned comes up. The non-xen kernel works fine. I''ve googled and its seems a solution
2008 Sep 19
2
usb irq problem
hallo to all . This is my first post to this list so please bare with me if i have made any mistake . My problem is : after every boot i receive the following message in terminal : > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: irq 50: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [<c044e6fa>] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69 > Sep 19 13:13:02
2009 May 28
2
Kernel message - Disabling IRQ #50
Hi all! After booting the server I have this message: irq 50: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff800c17e6>] __report_bad_irq+0x30/0x7d [<ffffffff800c1a19>] note_interrupt+0x1e6/0x227 [<ffffffff800c0f15>] __do_IRQ+0xbd/0x103 [<ffffffff8006e249>] do_IRQ+0x13f/0x14d [<ffffffff8006ca05>]
2011 Jan 18
6
Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared
Hello, We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) report bad irq, references CPU idle then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr then it disables the add-on
2010 Sep 13
1
irq 58 nobody cared.
I built a new server about 10 days ago running CentOS 5.latest, and it's been presenting a message shortly after booting: irq 58: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff800bb712>] __report_bad_irq+0x30/0x7d [<ffffffff800bb945>] note_interrupt+0x1e6/0x227 [<ffffffff800bae41>] __do_IRQ+0xbd/0x103
2008 Jan 08
3
centos 5.1 kernel dump
Below is a kernel dump that I just got. This is a fresh new install of centos 5.1 on NVIDIA gigabyte MB-GA-M61P-S3. nothing extra has been added. I have not tried the irqpoll but I am surprised to get this. Also the machine keeps running just hod this show on the console... Any ideas??? Jerry Jan 8 05:20:00 localhost kernel: irq 169: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll"
2012 May 04
2
Problem with ethernet card: r8169.
Hi all. I have two servers 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5PAE CentOS release 5.7 (Final) Both have two external gigabit network cards (installed Planet with Realtek r8169 chipset). lspci 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:01.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) /var/log/messages May 3
2006 Oct 08
3
irq issues ("nobody cared")
Hello, I''m having trouble during high IO activities: Oct 8 10:38:51 matrix kernel: irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Oct 8 10:38:51 matrix kernel: Oct 8 10:38:51 matrix kernel: Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff801519b0>{__report_bad_irq+48} Oct 8 10:38:51 matrix kernel: <ffffffff80151c0f>{note_interrupt+511}
2007 Jul 25
2
Crashing dom0 by unloading mISDN
Hi, I have a Fedora 7 xen system with a domU to which I have delegated via pciback two isdn pci cards. One is a HFC-S card, the other a AVM Fritz!Card Pci 2.0. In the domU I load mISDN drivers for the cards. The two cards are recognized and function well UNTIL I either decide to unload one or both of the card driver modules (hfcpci and avmfritz) or I decide to shut down the domU. At this
2009 Nov 02
1
supermicro hardware + sangoma
hi, i have new supermicro server (centos5, 2.6.30.9/2.6.27.34/2.6.18-distro kernels, wanpipe 3.5.6) card is: 1 . AFT-A101-SH : SLOT=4 : BUS=8 : IRQ=11 : CPU=A : PORT=1 : HWEC=32 : V=36 and i have this in log irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.30.9rh #1 Call Trace: [<c0465b07>] __report_bad_irq+0x27/0x90