Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch"
2007 Oct 26
1
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Michael Rock napsal(a):
> all-generic-ide irqpoll
>
> Without irqpoll it just hangs and without
> all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still
> need both to recognize the disk and continue
booting.
> Michael,
> I have tested 8.1.14 ICH9 x86_64 version and it's
kring fine. For sure
> im right now uploading full DVD isos. I did not want
to :o( due due to
>
2007 Oct 24
1
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
btw - I installed your x86_64 rpms that has the ich9
patch directly on that box but it still will not boot
without all the options.
--- Michael Rock <mikerocks65 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > David wrote:
> > Now there are right md5sums and even
> > x86_64 iso.delta.
> > David
>
> I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO
> but I notice it fails on
2007 Oct 27
1
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Oops sorry, ugh another poor selection of words as I
meant to say "When I saw the rest of my post snipped,
I then realized that last request sounds really bad,
which was not my intention.
> When you snip the rest of my post man that last
> request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I
> saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and
> thought I would
2015 Mar 24
2
Re: machine='pc-q35-2.1' and sata controller
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:36:33 -0400 John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Are the needed patches in 2.3.0-rc0?
> > Is it possible to backport AHCI migration to RHEL 7.1 qemu or will it be too much work?
>
> The patches that improve the stability of AHCI migration are in 2.3-rc0.
> We still have not /enabled/ migration upstream, but editing to code to
> allow it
2007 Oct 24
0
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Michael Rock napsal(a):
> Hi Dave,
>
> I am using applydeltaiso with your delta and
> CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso 4,186,786 bytes from one
> of the Centos mirrors. But the block size is wrong and
> does not match the image length.
>
> So I checked the md5 on your delta and it does not
> match your md5.txt file. I downloaded it again to be
> sure.
>
> Your
2007 Oct 26
1
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Hi all,
I've the same problem, I've download the
CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso from one centos mirror, i've applied
deltaiso and the created image is 2 GB, the md5sum check of iso.delta
(CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta) is ok, what's wrong ?
deltaiso program exit on the same as Michael , maybe I've downloaded
the worng DVD 64 bit iso version? do you know any good
2007 Oct 24
0
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
> David wrote:
> Now there are right md5sums and even
> x86_64 iso.delta.
> David
I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO
but I notice it fails on applying.
kdnssd-avahi-devel.i386: copying unchanged payload
kernel-xen.x86_64 (???): applying delta
new payload open failed
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
2007 Oct 27
0
Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
> WELCOME TO MY WORLD :D
> (Hey, are the new foobar packages done, how about
the xwyz packages)
> Thanks,
> JOhnny Hughes
When you snip the rest of my post man that last
request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I
saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and
thought I would ask. I really do not want to put
anyone out and please do not go through any
2014 Mar 08
1
Loss of network connectivity | kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Greetings all,
Running CentOS 6.5 x86_64 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64.
(already booting with the irqpoll option in grub)
Every few months I lose network connectivity and have to restart the server:
in /var/log/messages:
"
Mar 7 18:54:21 backup03 kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the
"irqpoll" option)
Mar 7 18:54:21 backup03 kernel: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted
2007 Oct 22
4
Centos 5.0 Intel G33/P35 Chipset Support (Asus P5K-VM, P5KC)
I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of
problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does
anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has
support for these chipsets be available on any on a
Centos mirror?
Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum
yet?
Here are my latest results with these chipsets and
Centos 5.1
1. Asus P5K, E6850, P35 Chipset: Does not
2008 Jan 09
1
irq 9: nobody cared(try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Hi
I am getting the error : irq 9: nobody cared(try booting with the "irqpoll"
option) before a kernel panic and the server reboots. Fresh installation of
CentOS 5.1. I selected the virtualisation option for install and was
presented with the xen kernel upon reboot. however the error mentioned
comes up. The non-xen kernel works fine. I''ve googled and its seems a
solution
2008 Sep 19
2
usb irq problem
hallo to all .
This is my first post to this list so please bare with me if i have made
any mistake .
My problem is :
after every boot i receive the following message in terminal :
> Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: irq 50: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [<c044e6fa>] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69
> Sep 19 13:13:02
2009 May 28
2
Kernel message - Disabling IRQ #50
Hi all!
After booting the server I have this message:
irq 50: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff800c17e6>] __report_bad_irq+0x30/0x7d
[<ffffffff800c1a19>] note_interrupt+0x1e6/0x227
[<ffffffff800c0f15>] __do_IRQ+0xbd/0x103
[<ffffffff8006e249>] do_IRQ+0x13f/0x14d
[<ffffffff8006ca05>]
2011 Jan 18
6
Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared
Hello,
We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well.
I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says:
IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
report bad irq, references CPU idle
then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr
then it disables the add-on
2010 Sep 13
1
irq 58 nobody cared.
I built a new server about 10 days ago running CentOS 5.latest,
and it's been presenting a message shortly after booting:
irq 58: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff800bb712>] __report_bad_irq+0x30/0x7d
[<ffffffff800bb945>] note_interrupt+0x1e6/0x227
[<ffffffff800bae41>] __do_IRQ+0xbd/0x103
2008 Jan 08
3
centos 5.1 kernel dump
Below is a kernel dump that I just got. This is a fresh new install of centos 5.1 on NVIDIA
gigabyte MB-GA-M61P-S3. nothing extra has been added.
I have not tried the irqpoll but I am surprised to get this.
Also the machine keeps running just hod this show on the console...
Any ideas???
Jerry
Jan 8 05:20:00 localhost kernel: irq 169: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll"
2012 May 04
2
Problem with ethernet card: r8169.
Hi all.
I have two servers
2.6.18-308.4.1.el5PAE
CentOS release 5.7 (Final)
Both have two external gigabit network cards (installed Planet with
Realtek r8169 chipset).
lspci
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169
Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10)
04:01.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169
Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10)
/var/log/messages
May 3
2006 Oct 08
3
irq issues ("nobody cared")
Hello,
I''m having trouble during high IO activities:
Oct 8 10:38:51 matrix kernel: irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with
the "irqpoll" option)
Oct 8 10:38:51 matrix kernel:
Oct 8 10:38:51 matrix kernel: Call Trace: <IRQ>
<ffffffff801519b0>{__report_bad_irq+48}
Oct 8 10:38:51 matrix kernel:
<ffffffff80151c0f>{note_interrupt+511}
2007 Jul 25
2
Crashing dom0 by unloading mISDN
Hi,
I have a Fedora 7 xen system with a domU to which I have delegated via
pciback two isdn pci cards. One is a HFC-S card, the other a AVM
Fritz!Card Pci 2.0.
In the domU I load mISDN drivers for the cards. The two cards are
recognized and function well UNTIL I either decide to unload one or both
of the card driver modules (hfcpci and avmfritz) or I decide to shut
down the domU. At this
2009 Nov 02
1
supermicro hardware + sangoma
hi,
i have new supermicro server (centos5, 2.6.30.9/2.6.27.34/2.6.18-distro
kernels, wanpipe 3.5.6)
card is:
1 . AFT-A101-SH : SLOT=4 : BUS=8 : IRQ=11 : CPU=A : PORT=1 : HWEC=32 : V=36
and i have this in log
irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.30.9rh #1
Call Trace:
[<c0465b07>] __report_bad_irq+0x27/0x90