Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Patents"
2000 Oct 02
2
Fraunhoffer claims patents on other formats
Here in the uk, to get a patent on anything, you have
to prove that the patent is not obvious and that there
is no prior art.
If there is prior art, then a patent cannot be given,
this is why people patenting stuff have to keep it a
secret until they actually have the patent, otherwise
it is considered to have been released into the public
domain.
Once something is in the public domain, nobody
2000 Dec 10
0
Patents on algorithms harm data analytic services
Cologne, 10.12.00
Dear Sir,
Dear Madam,
We are concerned about the possibility that the European Commission might introduce software patenting into the European Community because we think this will harm our profession.
We make our living on data management and statistical analyses. Modern statistics crucially depends on algorithms [cf. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (1999). Modern applied
2000 Dec 14
8
new MS codecs
I thought this might be interesting to you, it's an
extract from the latest streaming media newsletter, I
was intrested to note that MS are claiming cd quality
audio at 48kbps whichi is obviously very low, I didn't
think much of it at first because nobody uses MS
codecs for audio anyway! However (a bit I missed off
this quote by the look of it) I then read mention of
portable audio players
2000 Nov 15
2
speech in vorbis
I was wondering how vorbis fares as a speech codec? I
mean can it give similar or better quality as
GSM/Toast at the same kind of bitrates/filesize?
I'm not worried about streaming but I'd love to be
able to create really small voice files.
Can anyone give me an idea of filesize for recording
time for pure speech based use?
love
Freya
__________________________________________________
2015 Jan 18
2
NHW Image codec
Hello,
Ok, and that's too many work to review a source code.In my codec, I have 3
compression schemes, I think 2 are not patented, but the third... I don't
know.For the rest, I think my codec is patent-free (I don't use
SPIHT,EZW,zerotree methods), even the wavelet transform is new and don't
use the lifting scheme nor the convolution product.
Else, if you found time to review the
2000 Dec 11
3
YAPQ (Yet Another Patent Question)
Looks like the mpeg gestapo are frantically at work cracking down on mpeg
projects. Several important projects (tsunami mpeg, gogo, faac, etc) were
shut down by the jack booted patent nazis.
Since FhG, mpegla, etc plan to start charging royalties on
everything even remotely mpeg-related very soon, I expect a lot of
interest is going to shift to Vorbis.
And soon thereafter, I expect FhG to attack
2003 Aug 19
1
for those of you who want a patent...
Alvaro Munoz (Hopkins Epi) is patenting the "diamond graph".
http://www.jhsph.edu/Press_Room/Press_Releases/Munoz_diamond_graph.html
There is enough prior art (hexagonal binning, among others) to make
this amusing, except that it probably will get a patent. It's a reasonable
graphical technique, but patentable?
best,
-tony
--
A.J. Rossini
rossini at u.washington.edu
2005 Jun 24
1
r programming help II
Dear List,
Suppose we have a variable K.JUN defined as (with
1=wet, 0=dry):
K.JUN1984 = c(1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1,
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1)
K.JUN1985 = c(0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1,
1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1)
K.JUN1986 = c(0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1)
2017 Feb 08
2
Using g729 now that patents have expired
AFAIK g729 patent is expiring sometime in 2019-2020.
Mitul Limbani
On Feb 8, 2017 5:02 AM, "Victor Villarreal" <mefhigoseth at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I understand your question and your point, but I use the g729 codec from
> the link that Carlos share, for almost 6 years from Asterisk 1.4 to v13
> without a single problem.
>
> So, sory but I
2011 Jun 17
3
rle on large data . . . without a for loop!
I think need to do something like this:
dat<-data.frame(state=sample(id=rep(1:5,each=200),1:3, 1000,
replace=T,prob=c(0.7,0.05,0.25)),V1=runif(1,10,1000),V2=rnorm(1000))
rle.dat<-rle(dat$state)
temp<-1
out<-data.frame(id=1:length(rle.dat$length))
for(i in 1:length(rle.dat$length)){
temp2<-temp+rle.dat$length[[i]]
out$V1[i]<-mean(dat$V1[temp:temp2])
2012 Oct 16
2
cannot coerce class '"rle"' into a data.frame
why?
> rle
Run Length Encoding
lengths: int [1:1650061] 2 2 8 2 4 5 6 3 26 46 ...
values : chr [1:1650061] "4bbf9e94cbceb70c BG bg" "4fbbf2c67e0fb867 SK sk" ...
> as.data.frame(rle)
Error in as.data.frame.default(vertices.rle) :
cannot coerce class '"rle"' into a data.frame
it seems that
rle.df <-
2013 Mar 26
2
Feed rle() output to hist()
I want to make a histogram from the lengths vector which is part of the
output of rle. But I don't know how to access that vector so that I use it
as an argument of hist(). What argument must I use so that I use the
lengths vector as an input to hist()?
Example output is:
Run Length Encoding
lengths: int [1:4] 1 2 3 3
values : num [1:4] -1 1 -1 1
A printout of the function rle() may
2000 Dec 18
2
Compaq sued for violating video-compression patents
I know Tarkin is not the priority right now, but when it becomes
it's good to know which company might feel nervous...
------------------------------------------
Compaq sued for alleged patent violations
By Bloomberg News
November 20, 2000, 5:30 a.m. PT
WILMINGTON, Del.--Compaq Computer, the world's biggest personal computer
maker, has been sued by a group for allegedly infringing
2010 May 24
2
VP8
Patenting a mathematical formula is NOT creating a machine nor is it unique. For example. 2+2=4... apples + apples^2= given outcome. I want to patent this. It's stupid to patent something like that. The same is true for formula algorithms. Algorithms occur in nature. Thus should not be patented. Now, Volley G Mathison inventor of the Electropsychometer had a machine that he could patent. A
2011 Jun 23
3
problem (and solution) to rle on vector with NA values
Hello there R-help,
I'm not sure if this should be posted here - so apologies if this is the case.
I've found a problem while using rle and am proposing a solution to the issue.
Description:
I ran into a niggle with rle today when working with vectors with NA values
(using R 2.31.0 on Windows 7 x64). It transpires that a run of NA values
is not encoded in the same way as a run of other
2009 Jul 07
2
rle
Hallo,
I have an other problem, I have this vector signData with an alternation of
1 and -1 that corrispond to the duration of two different percepts. I
extracted the durations like this:
signData<- scan("dataTR10.txt")
dur<-rle(signData)$length
Now I would like to extract only the positive duration, e.g.
signData <- c(1,1,1,1,-1,-1,-1,1,1,-1,-1)
posduration <- c(4,2)
I
2012 Jun 08
2
help with rle function on paired data
Dear R Community - I hope you might be able to provide some guidance
regarding the use of the rle function. I have a set of time-series data
where a measured value is recorded every 30 seconds after the start of an
experiment. Many of the measured values repeat and I am interested only in
the values when there is a change. If I turn the measured values into a
vector, the rle function works
2001 Oct 19
0
Patents and GPL (was: Re: PlusV)
Craig Dickson (crdic@yahoo.com) wrote :
> Jack Moffitt wrote:
>
> > I agree that this might be the case. But what happens with the
> > violation is by the author? :)
> >
> > Ie, in the case of PlusV releasing a patented codec under the GPL or in
> > the case of LAME or FreeType's authors doing similar things. What
> > state is that?
>
>
2011 Mar 10
2
Not sure how to handle hazard in my survival model
Hi R experts :)
I'm trying to carry out a survival model on my data, but I am unsure of
whether it's appropriate or if I should do something specific in regards to
hazard.
My data is time to death by predator where I have 8 prey and one predator in
the setting. This means that two prey can't possibly die at the same time
and I can't quite get my head around how to include this in
2000 Dec 15
6
patents and separate entropy coding
Hi everyone,
first of all, I searched through the archives for any posts resembling
this, I didn't read all posts about the patents so if this has been
suggested before I apologise.
I read in an article on C|Net (I think, it was linked from Slashdot
anyway) that Thompson are threatening to sue you if Ogg Vorbis becomes a
success. Which is evil, and I'm also mad at them because they never