similar to: Update on Ogg-based IETF standard documents (MIME-types, file formats)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "Update on Ogg-based IETF standard documents (MIME-types, file formats)"

2003 Jan 07
3
Vorbis RTP Internet Draft
Hi all, Below is the Vorbis RTP Internet Draft as sent to the AVT working group of the IETF. Comments and feedback is still welcomed from the Vorbis community. Cheers Phil ---------------------------8<-----------------8<------------------------ Network Working Group Phil Kerr Internet-Draft The Ogg Vorbis January 07, 2003 Community / OpenDrama
2003 Jun 05
1
Updated Vorbis-RTP Internet Draft
Hi All, Please find below an updated Vorbis-RTP Internet Draft document for review and discussion at the Xiph IRC meeting on Saturday. The changes in this version have been: Codebook caching mechanism Expanded SDP parameters Expanded MIME section Expanded introduction Packet loss section Minor tweaks and clarity changes to text There are probably some minor tweaks to the formatting needed
2002 Dec 16
2
Updated Vorbis RTP I-D
Hi all, Apologies in advance, this email is quite long. I've prepared an updated Vorbis RTP Internet Draft, which is a continuation of draft-moffitt-vorbis-rtp-00.txt which can be found below. If this new draft gets the ok I'd like to submit this to the AVT WG later this week. There are a number of changes over the original I-D, notably the changing of the M bit function in the RTP
2004 Aug 06
0
draft-herlein-speex-rtp-profile-01
Hi all, Please find below the -01 update to draft-herlein-speex-rtp-profile, as submitted to the IETF. Regards Phil <p>-------------------8<-----------------------------------8<--------------------- <p><p>Internet Engineering Task Force Greg Herlein Internet Draft Jean-Marc Valin
2004 Aug 06
0
Updated Speex RTP Internet Draft
Hello, What's the purpose of the 'sr' sdp parameter ? The sample rate is already given in the a=rtpmap line ? Simon Le dim 29/06/2003 à 12:12, philkerr@elec.gla.ac.uk a écrit : > Hi all, > > Please find below an updated Speex Internet Draft document. > > It would be good if we could book some time for discussion on Speex at the IETF > meeting in Vienna (scheduled
2003 Jan 11
3
Update on IETF Internet-Drafts
Good day, FYI, I've just sent the attached email to IETF to progress our I-Ds. There are also links to updated documents in this email. Cheers, Silvia. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New I-Ds for Ogg technologies (Vorbis over RTP, Ogg file format, Mimetypes) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:36:31 +1100 From: Silvia Pfeiffer <Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au> Organization: CSIRO To: AVT
2003 Jan 11
3
Update on IETF Internet-Drafts
Good day, FYI, I've just sent the attached email to IETF to progress our I-Ds. There are also links to updated documents in this email. Cheers, Silvia. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New I-Ds for Ogg technologies (Vorbis over RTP, Ogg file format, Mimetypes) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:36:31 +1100 From: Silvia Pfeiffer <Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au> Organization: CSIRO To: AVT
2003 Feb 11
1
Update on Vorbis RTP I-D
Hi all, I'm in the final stages of putting a new Vorbis RTP draft together, the new sections are below. There are a number of open questions: 1.) At present there is a 16 bit length field for the codebooks. As they are spec'd as being unbound in length, but typically around 15K, are there situations where they may be greater than 64KB? The size limit can be extended to 2MB as there
2003 Jan 07
0
RTP-Vorbis MIME type Internet-Draft
Hi all, Please find below an I-D for the proposed registration of MIME type audio/rtp-vorbis. All comments most welcome. Barry <p>-----------8<------------- Network Working Group Barry Short Internet-Draft The Ogg Vorbis Community / OpenDrama Expires: July 7, 2003 January 7, 2003 <p>
2007 May 29
0
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: > <...> > > If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead > and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment on it also after it > has been submitted, but we would like to get the input from the Speex > community first.. > thanks for all the input. please find attached an updated version of the draft. I
2007 Jun 07
0
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Hi Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A, as requested by Ivo. Many thanks for your input. I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group /alfred Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves wrote: > Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC. > > Check
2004 Aug 06
3
Updated Speex RTP Internet Draft
Hi all, Please find below an updated Speex Internet Draft document. It would be good if we could book some time for discussion on Speex at the IETF meeting in Vienna (scheduled for 14th July). The cutoff for submission is 9:00am EDT, (GMT -04:00), 30th June. Comments and feedback welcomed! Regards Phil
2007 Jun 07
1
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Looks good to me. Jean-Marc Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit : > Hi > > Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only > change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A, > as requested by Ivo. > > Many thanks for your input. > > I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group > > > /alfred > > Ivo
2007 May 15
4
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Hi all We are about to send an updated version of the internet draft "RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec" to the IETF AVT working group. Before submitting we would like your input, if you have any comments or input please send them to the mailing list. If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment
2001 Feb 22
3
rtp payload format
http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/draft-moffitt-vorbis-rtp-00.txt This is the Internet-Draft I'll be submitting tomorrow and hopefully presenting at the March IETF meeting. If you see anything major, let me know right away, I'll be submitting this in the morning. jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To
2001 Feb 14
2
RTP/RTCP payload?
(hello all, this is my first writing. so please bear with me if I'm wrong anywhere.) orry to break too lately, but how is the RTP payload submission is going? could we see the new payload at March IETF? I agree that it would be fairy straightforward to make an RTP payload for ogg vorbis, assuming raw packets, AFAIK. using physical bitstream is, in this case, not adequate by the reasons in
2000 Nov 20
4
Vorbis over RTP
Hi. I got bored of writing papers last week so I decided to write an app for sending and receiving multicast vorbis streams over RTP. A first version is available here: http://www.cdt.luth.se/~rolle/vorbis/ (I use the JOrbis decoder, so you need Java 2 with Javasound, e.g. JDK1.3. Since the decoding is done in Java, you probably need at least 300-350 MHz. Works with the IBM JDK1.3 on Linux on a
2000 Nov 20
4
Vorbis over RTP
Hi. I got bored of writing papers last week so I decided to write an app for sending and receiving multicast vorbis streams over RTP. A first version is available here: http://www.cdt.luth.se/~rolle/vorbis/ (I use the JOrbis decoder, so you need Java 2 with Javasound, e.g. JDK1.3. Since the decoding is done in Java, you probably need at least 300-350 MHz. Works with the IBM JDK1.3 on Linux on a
2001 Feb 25
0
RTP Payload for Vorbis Audio: draft-moffitt-vorbis-rtp-00.txt
We want to push for an open and standards compliant system for all multimedia. We've done a good job on the interoperability side with icecast and MP3. We're making a ton of progress with the Vorbis codec as well, which will allow us to do many things we weren't able to do before. It's time to start thinking about RTSP, RTP, Multicast and all of the other standards and features.
2004 Aug 06
0
Comments on New RTP Profile Document
The latest revision of the draft profile for use of Speex in RTP is attached. We plan on submitting this - or a modified version of this, based on immediate feedback - to the IETF on Monday for consideration at the next meeting. Major differences in this revision are: - removed the discussion in the MIME section. It's a duplicate of the SDP discussion anyway, and may or may not match the