similar to: [Fwd: psnr/video codecs tests]

Hi Gabriel, I m trying to author a test suite for video codecs. Can you guide me how to go about it? I need some ideas to get started with. Thanks Ramu Can u reply for this mail. --------------------------------- Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Gabriel, I m trying to author a test suite for video codecs. Can you guide me how to go about it? I need some ideas to get started with. Thanks Jina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora/attachments/20050906/3c71295d/attachment.htm

a couple points before I look at this too hard: "For VP3, since you can't do a constant quality encode" what? that should not be the case. Could be a QT-specific bug. Theora at any rate is certainly capable of doing constant-quality encode. This probably explains your standard deviation complaint -- VP3 is running a rate control alg, where the other codecs are just shooting for

On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Makc wrote: > Here's what you can find in the net on YUV scheme: Hmm? What prompted this? > The statement I care to make here, is simply that there ain't neither > such thing as "luminance", which details "the eye is more sensitive to", "ain't neither"? Double negative, so I take your statement to mean that there *is* such

I've been encoding with ffmpeg.exe. Due to the muxing issue, I tried ffmpeg2theora, but I ran into some issues 1. it fails on 1080p content. 1920x1080. 1920x800 is okay. 2. I have raw yuv. in ffmpeg I use -s 1920x1080 to specify the source size. ffmpeg2theora doesnt seem to have a way to accept width/height for the raw yuv (420). So I need to do an additional step of muxing it into a

I was wondering about Vorbis compatibility. It seems that wavelets and joint-stereo could be introduced later on Vorbis. I know the specifications are now frozen, but there is no real spec docs yet. So will the vorbis players still be able to decode Vorbis once joint or wavelet will be introduced, or will they need to be updated? Regards, -- Gabriel Bouvigne - France bouvigne@mp3-tech.org

To whom it may concern. As I would like to analyse some array data I was keen on downloading the lumi package that depends obviously on hdrcde that is not available for r 2.12.1. I did not find instructions to solve or circumvent this problem. Installing hdrcde by hand did not work either. It was not detected by > (.packages(all.available=TRUE)) if installed in the R library. Thanks Hermann

> > So > > it's closer to Dolby AC-X than to VQ. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that it's > > not patended by Dolby. > > Could you be more specific? More than anything else, we need to know more > about the patent waters we're navigating. > > Monty As Dolby AC-X is using enveloppe of the sound since several years, and as it seems that Dolby was

I've got an idea for joint multichannel coding. Here is my idea: My idea is a process for coding 2,3,4 or 5 combined channels, in a compatible way for decoders unable to deal with combined channels. part1: All channels to be coded are summed, each one effected by a coefficient related to its sound power importance for the listener. The sum of all channels is devided by the square root of the

Hello, In my last post, I seemed to say that there were no directional wavelet transforms that would give improvement to the NHW codec, but are directional wavelets an active research field today? I have also seen some recent patents on advanced and improved SPIHT, and I am a little surprised that there is no "up-to-date" state-of-the-art wavelet codec.Rududu in April 2008 was the last

Hi all, My name is Amy, I am a masters student in Bioinformatics at North Carolina State University. I am working on a project and I am trying to use the lumi R package for microarray data analysis. I have shown the sample code here and have questions about modifying the sample code for my own data. lumi package in R, example.lumi, the sample data has 8000 features and 4 samples I have

Hi all, My name is Amy, I am a masters student in Bioinformatics at North Carolina State University. I am working on a project and I am trying to use the lumi R package for microarray data analysis. I have shown the sample code here and have questions about modifying the sample code for my own data. lumi package in R, example.lumi, the sample data has 8000 features and 4 samples I have

Hi all, I'm trying to generate barplots from simple but long (~100000-row) data files, in which each bar will comprise two stacked 'sub-bars'. All the upper sub-bars will have the same hue, and all the lower bars will, likewise, have another uniform hue. However, I wish to specify the luminance (aka brightness) of each bar (i.e., each whole bar comprising two sub-bars) separately,

Hi all, I have to compare the theora codec with MPEG and H264. I was googling and I found that the PSNR is a common used parameter. How can I do this with Theora? Thanks -- Leonardo de Paula Rosa Piga Undergraduate Computer Engineering Student LSC - IC - UNICAMP http://www.students.ic.unicamp.br/~ra033956

Greetings, I'm working on image classification and for that I want to use the spectral slope as a feature for my classifier. For this I would prefer to calculate this feature using R, so far I've read my image and converted it's RGB representation into HSL. The spectral slope is computed over the Luminance component, so at the moment what I have is a NxN matrix of Luminance values.

Hello, Definitely not any (constructive) comments on the NHW Image codec? According to my tests, it can compare good with reference codecs like x264 intra and WebP. Yes, the codec is still experimental and is optimized for visual (subjective) evaluation, not PSNR.Its main feature is again that it would have a little more neatness/sharpness and a little less precision (residual coding is applied

Hello, Yes, that's right, I had the remark that if I say that the NHW codec would have more neatness/sharpness, this must be also accompanied with objective measure.But the neatness/sharpness measure is quite complex to define, and implement. But at classical visual review step, I would find that the NHW codec would be less blurred (maybe PSNR would like blur?...) with more

Hi, I guess this is a good time to start putting together a wish list for a video codec. I see that for audio the compression is around 10X for reasonable quality. I am sure this will start its own thread of conversation. For video you can do 40X fairly easily and the big task is to go to 80X or 100X with reasonable picture quality, say, a peak luma SNR of more than 30 dB. Uncompressed

I'm working with the following code below to generate a how do I set the h,c, and l values such that the significant, positive residuals appear different on a grayscale printer from significant grayscale residuals. The challenge as I see it is that one can only distinguish the positive and negative residuals with the hue/. Varying the chroma and the luminance only affect the

Here's the problem: > 2) Encoding with rate control as in single pass "Bitrate > control" will not > lead to better quality than fixed quant (with the right value > of the fixed > quant). Ratecontrol doens't know anything about "quality". It > will try to > reach more-or-less CBR. > > But somehow this is not a fair comparison, because