similar to: Stereo <-> Mono

Hi, We're using Celt 0.7.1 at the moment. We're thinking to update the code to a newer version of it. Is there an appreciable complexity (decoding time) difference among versions (0.7.1 - 0.8.1 - 0.9.1 - 0.10 - 0.11.1)? If so, which one is the fastest? Thanks Regards Riccardo Riccardo Micci Senior DSP Engineer, Wireless Group Cambridge Consultants Science Park, Milton Road

Hi, In order to fit the decoder in memory in our embedded architecture we set the MAX_PERIOD #define equal to the frame size. This doesn't affect the code bit accuracy in normal decoding. The #define it's used celt_decode_lost function though. Is it possible to get celt_decode_lost to work with a value different from the default? Thanks Riccardo Riccardo Micci Senior DSP Engineer,

Hi, I'm using Celt version 0.7.1 in low complexity mode (i.e. no pitch information). In case a packet is lost i was planning to use the celt_decode_lost function. I realised though it uses pitch information inside. Does the celt_decode_lost function still works with no pitch information? Are there some changes to be done? Thanks Regards Riccardo Riccardo Micci Senior DSP Engineer,

Hi, I'm testing CELT 0.7.1 speed performance and I'm focusing now on the complexity switch. I've dug in the archive and i found some information. Is it still true that there are two ranges? - 0-2 low complexity mode - 3-10 high complexity mode If no input is given is 2 hence low complexity mode the default setting? Does the complexity mode affect decoding as well? Thank you Best

Hi, Our DSP has a built-in bitrev instruction so we're exploring the possibility of calculating the bitrev every time instead of filling the table during initialisation, hence saving some memory. Our frame size is fixed to 320 samples. The two FFTs sizes for normal block and short block are 160 and 40 respectively. It's not really clear how the function

Hi, I was checking complexity modes of CELT 07.1 encoder. If i got it correctly everything is driven by pitch_available variable set in celt_encoder_create function. By default it's set to 1 hence high complexity mode is used all the time. I tried to disable it and although i couldn't hear any particular difference in the decoded audio quality, the cycle count of the encoder dropped

Hi, I've recently successful built and run CELT under Windows using "testcelt.c" example file. Since I'm about to port it on a embedded platform i activated the FIXED_POINT #define. I included fixed_generic.h and without other changes to the code i tried to encode and decode the same file i previously used. The output though is completely saturated i.e. it jumps from -32768 to

Hello, I'm porting CELT 0.7.1 to an embedded platform and unfortunately (at least for me) CHAR is defined as 16 bits. I now got the vocoder compiling but when i compare the encoded output with a windows build, they don't match. Among the other problems i think that the char definition is one of the biggest players. I've seen in arch.h the following definitions: /* 2 on TI C5x DSP */

eds to drag in the source and header files from the libcelt directory into = the project and define HAVE_CONFIG_H is the project's pre-processor definit= ion. The tricky part is to build a config.h file. To get it to work on VS some = of the important settings include. =20 #define CELT_BUILD #define USE_ALLOCA #undef VAR_ARRAYS #undef restrict #undef HAVE_STDINT_H #undef inline #define

Hi, My name is Riccardo Micci i downloaded the CELT source code and I compiled it under Windows. This is meant to be a preliminary study for my company's project. When i run CELT it encodes and decodes the file back saying "Encoder matches decoder!!". When i try to play the output though the result is just noise and clicks. The only changes I've applied are some #defines to

Hi, I'm using Celt 0.7.1 in fixed math mode. In the celt_encode function, if the variable has_pitch is true, the function pitch_search is called. Within this function the find_best_pitch subfunction is called. Here the variable "float score;" is defined. Is this right? I was expecting not to see any float declaration in the fixed math code. Is it possible to redefine it as

Hi, We're testing CELT (version 0.7.1) error resilience capability. We've used already celtdec packet-loss options. Hence we know what to expect in case of whole packet loss. How does Celt respond to a broken encoded packet? Is it always better to discard it and decode the missing frame through decode_lost? We have the hardware capability of protecting the frame with multiple CRCs.

Hi, Fiddling with Celt i found a possible bug. I'm using CELT 0.7.1, frame size 256, sample rate 32k and bitrate 64k. Here is the scenario: decoding side, celt_decode function. The "dec" structure is created at each function call and it's initialized with ec_dec_init function. The attribute "end_byte" is not initialized though. Decoding a file the behaviour is the

Hi, I'm trying to implement a vorbis decoder, and am having some trouble getting it to work with stereo vorbis data. It's giving me some PCM output which is roughly right, but it has artefacts. I think it's most likely something to do with my handling of floor decode/curve synthesis. My first thoughts are that I'm handling the submap number/floor mapping incorrectly; I'm

Crew, I've run into something a little odd with the vorbis encoder and would like some input. I use SpacialAudio's SAM3 Broadcaster and am having problems with the ogg encoder when I create a mono output stream. It seems as if the signal level of the left and right sides are being combined before the encoding process, leaving the sound muddy and overdriven. As such, if I reduce

Looking at the Opus comparison page[1], I can't figure out whether the Opus/AAC/Vorbis/MP3 lines are meant to imply a mono or stereo encoding. Could someone please update the caption to clarify this? The single dot for G.711 is clearly mono, but for stereo music, are the codecs at the top meant to converge near 128 kbps, or 256 kbps? [1] http://opus-codec.org/comparison/

Paul, you may find the following page has more useful/accurate numbers than that diagram: https://wiki.xiph.org/Opus_Recommended_Settings ________________________________ From: opus <opus-bounces at xiph.org> on behalf of Paul Marks <pmarks at google.com> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:31:39 PM To: opus at xiph.org <opus at xiph.org> Subject: [opus]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello For some reasons, I need to encode in mono a stereo wave file, as with the --downmix option from oggenc. I searched in speexenc man page and in the on line documentation, unsuccessfully. Of course I could first use something like sox to down mix my file, but it would be more practical to have an option directly in speexenc. - -- RIQUER

Sorry for the questions out of the mail list's subject. 1) Could you help me with getting information on how can I convert multichannecl (e.g. 5.1) non-encoded (PCM) data into mono\stereo? I suppose this performed in the manner like: Left = x1*(Front Left)+x2*(Back Left).... But is there exist commonly used standards to perform this task? 2) It seems FLAC pjoject have been frozen for some

Hi, folks, I have an old CELT thing that I'm updating to Opus and I'm trying to get individual pieces upgraded.  My first task is upgrading the CELT encoder to Opus. The old CELT thing treated the L and R channels as independent mono streams, encoded them somehow with CELT to form one bitstream, sent one bitstream across, and then unpacked it manually after the decoder. Can I do that