opus - Feb 2011 - CELT decoder complexity

Hi,
We're using Celt 0.7.1 at the moment. We're thinking to update the code
to
a newer version of it. Is there an appreciable complexity (decoding time) 
difference among versions (0.7.1 - 0.8.1 - 0.9.1 - 0.10 - 0.11.1)?
If so, which one is the fastest?

Thanks

Regards
Riccardo


Riccardo Micci
Senior DSP Engineer, Wireless Group 
Cambridge Consultants
Science Park, Milton Road 
Cambridge, CB4 0DW, England
Switchboard: +44 (0)1223 420024
Direct dial: +44 (0)1223 392402
Mobile: +44 (0)
Fax: +44 (0)1223 423373
riccardo.micci at cambridgeconsultants.com
www.CambridgeConsultants.com
 





This email is from Cambridge Consultants Limited, Science Park, Milton 
Road, Cambridge CB4 0DW with registered number 1036298 England. It may 
contain confidential information. It is intended for the addressee only 
and may not be copied or disclosed to any third party without our 
permission. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the 
sender as soon as possible and delete the material from any computer. If 
this email has been sent as a personal message to the addressee, the 
sender is not acting in his/her capacity as an employee or officer of 
Cambridge Consultants Limited and no liability is accepted for the content 
of any such email. Outgoing email may be monitored for the purpose of 
ensuring compliance with our email policy and relevant laws.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20110215/252a800a/attachment-0002.htm

I haven't measured it, but I expect 0.9.x and later to have lower 
complexity due to the replacement of the pitch predictor by a less 
complex post-filter.

	Jean-Marc

On 11-02-15 12:04 PM, Riccardo Micci wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We're using Celt 0.7.1 at the moment. We're thinking to update the
code
> to a newer version of it. Is there an appreciable complexity (decoding
> time) difference among versions (0.7.1 - 0.8.1 - 0.9.1 - 0.10 - 0.11.1)?
> If so, which one is the fastest?
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Riccardo
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Riccardo Micci
> Senior DSP Engineer, Wireless Group
>
> *Cambridge Consultants*
> Science Park, Milton Road
> Cambridge, CB4 0DW, England
> Switchboard: +44 (0)1223 420024
> Direct dial: +44 (0)1223 392402
> Mobile: +44 (0)
> Fax: +44 (0)1223 423373
> riccardo.micci at cambridgeconsultants.com
> <mailto:riccardo.micci at cambridgeconsultants.com>
> www.CambridgeConsultants.com <http://www.cambridgeconsultants.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> This email is from Cambridge Consultants Limited, Science Park, Milton
> Road, Cambridge CB4 0DW with registered number 1036298 England. It may
> contain confidential information. It is intended for the addressee only
> and may not be copied or disclosed to any third party without our
> permission. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the
> sender as soon as possible and delete the material from any computer. If
> this email has been sent as a personal message to the addressee, the
> sender is not acting in his/her capacity as an employee or officer of
> Cambridge Consultants Limited and no liability is accepted for the
> content of any such email. Outgoing email may be monitored for the
> purpose of ensuring compliance with our email policy and relevant laws.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> celt-dev mailing list
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev