similar to: Patch for GPFS support

List, We, IBM, have developed a patch that enhances RSYNC. This patch provides extensions to RSYNC to map to and use filesystem extensions present in the IBM GPFS cluster filesystem. (GPFS is a cluster filesystem for Linux and AIX that provides additional attributes such as NFSv4 ACLs, extended attributes and windows attributes in addition to the common posix permissions) This will greatly

Dear All, I have been seeing some strange behavior using rsync 3.1.1 on OSX with the 3 standard patches applied when using the --backup and --backup-Dir options. This works as expected on 3.0.9, moving any files on dest that are not on source to the backup folder. If no changes then the backup folder is not even created. -aHAXN --fileflags --force-change --protect-decmpfs ?delete --backup

Dear All, I found a workaround for the corrupted backup app package files though there is probably a more intelligent way. When the destination is empty or missing (rather than an update) rsync.c calls make_backup and returns 1 when it encounters if (x_lstat(fname, &sx.st, NULL) < 0) return 1; the calling code in rsync.c: if ( make_backups > 0 && overwriting_basis) {

Similar to --omit-{dir,link}-times: --omit-device-times omit device files from --times --omit-special-times omit sockets and fifos from --times Also, fix corner case that allows --omit-dir-times to be ignored. See unchanged_attrs() and recv_generator()'s call to try_dests_non(). Marc. diff -aNpRruz -X /etc/diff.excludes rsync-3.2.7/generator.c devel-3.2.7/generator.c ---

I've been getting spurious unnecessary copying of files on OSX when using the crtimes patch and the --crtimes -H options (version 3.0.4). I can reliably demonstrate it (on OSX 10.5) by doing this several times (as root): rsync -v -N -axHAX --delete-during --fileflags --force-change /usr/ bin/ /tmp/foo/ I think I've tracked it down to the hard-link processing code in

Some of my users have reported problems with rsync puking on locked folders. The errors typically look like this: rsync -aNHAXx --fileflags --force-change --no-inc-recursive / /Volumes/ Backup > rsync: mkstemp "/Volumes/SCSI Backup/Users/Ken/Library/Caches/ > Metadata/Safari/Bookmarks/..DS_Store.N9xtNy" failed: Operation not > permitted (1) (51) > rsync: mkstemp

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12036 Bug ID: 12036 Summary: Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest flags produce incorrect behavior Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7489 Summary: rsyncd segfaults using daemon exclude filter Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: michael.roberts at hp.com

Thanks Wayne and everybody, This is a huge boost to have a modern rsync for OSX. We're all grateful. Rob D PS I did notice that we lost the bsd flags test in 3.0. It was ok in pre10.... thanks again bbouncer Verifying: basic-permissions ... ok Verifying: timestamps ... Sub-test: modification time ... ok ok Verifying: symlinks ... ok Verifying:

In debian bug #498083 (http://bugs.debian.org/498083) someone is getting segfaults reasonably consistently, however when using -vvvv it doesn't happen... Fortunately Sven was able to get a good backtrace. I can't quite see what's causing the problem; it does seem to be related to xattrs. Please see the bugs report at the url above for the details. Any help much appreciated. Paul

This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new APIs to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs in

Hi, first of all, sorry for taking so long. Unfortunately, some other tasks kept coming up. Anyway, attached is the version of the flags patch, that is based on the one I'm using with 2.6.9. It is against the rsync-3.0.0pre9 release. I've included the option name change from the repository, so the option is now called --fileflags. Improved from the previously distributed version is the

Looking at http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/patches/fileflags.diff -- It looks like the changes from fileflags-fixes.diff patch were applied to the patch from http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-patches-3.0.0.tar.gz , but this entire chunk of the that original diff file was lost: > diff -up a/config.h.in b/config.h.in > --- a/config.h.in > +++ b/config.h.in > @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@

Hello, I am using the vfs_gpfs samba module to map ACLs through samba. It works fine on files, but directory ACLs are ignored. Ex: getfacl /sb/share/myplace/ file: sb/share/myplace/ owner: root group: root user::rwx user:afrankel:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- When I try to access this folder in Windows, I get permission denied. The same permissions on a files, I can open it / modify it

Hi, I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone might be able to speak about using IBM's GPFS filesystem as a means of storing virtual guests in a clustered environment with CentOS as the nodes and KVM as the hypervisor? I'm looking at using IBM's TSM software for archiving data from disk to tape. This requires buying a license for GPFS which is used in conjunction with TSM but can also be used

Hi all, At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed. [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name:

Hello, does this bug still exists: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/IPyW4fzzpEetiWKnJyfJ ? It seems that I have the same problem, although "store dos attributes" is set (Samba 3.6.18; GPFS 3.5.0-11). Here my share definition: [shared] comment = <comment> path = <path> available = yes

Hi Rob, on your Info for Version 3.0.25 you pointed out the VFS-Module GPFS for using features of the underlaying GPFS-Filesystem. Also the man-pages-3/vfs_gpfs.8.html points to that module, but I can't find it anywhere. We are using a GPFS 3.2 3-Node Samba Cluster (3.0.24/28) on Dell HW. We would be very glad if it is posible to get - Quota Recognition for our users (we use "max

Morning All! Anyone ever tried exporting a StorNext CVFS filesystem from a Linux box??? I?ve got this Samba server (3.5.6) running on CentOS 5.4 and it?s working fine, exporting ext3, nfs and an IBM GPFS filesystem just fine. So I know Samba is good an my configuration is working. I tried to add the exportation of a StorNext CVFS volume and that doesn?t work. All the other volumes still work