samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jul-25  22:52 UTC
[Bug 12036] New: Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest flags produce incorrect behavior
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12036
            Bug ID: 12036
           Summary: Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest
                    flags produce incorrect behavior
           Product: rsync
           Version: 3.1.2
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: core
          Assignee: wayned at samba.org
          Reporter: ckuehl at ocf.berkeley.edu
        QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org
Created attachment 12288
  --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=12288&action=edit
reproduction
We have observed what seems like incorrect behavior when using a command like
this:
    rsync -avc --link-dest=../copy_dest/good --link-dest=../copy_dest/bad src/
dest
with a directory stucture that looks like this:
    .
    ├── copy_dest
    │   ├── bad
    │   │   └── file       # contains different content from src, but same
attributes (e.g. mtime)
    │   └── good
    │       └── file       # contains same content as src, but different
attributes (e.g. mtime)
    └── src
        └── file
Using the command above, we see that "bad/file" is hard-linked into
"dest",
even though it is different from "file" in src.
I've attached repro.sh which reliably reproduces this for me on the latest
version of rsync.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jul-25  22:53 UTC
[Bug 12036] Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest flags produce incorrect behavior
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12036
--- Comment #1 from Chris Kuehl <ckuehl at ocf.berkeley.edu> ---
Looking through the code, this sticks out to me:
    static int try_dests_reg(struct file_struct *file, char *fname, int ndx,
                 char *cmpbuf, stat_x *sxp, int find_exact_for_existing,
                 int itemizing, enum logcode code)
    {
        STRUCT_STAT real_st = sxp->st;
        int best_match = -1;
        int match_level = 0;
        int j = 0;
        do {
            pathjoin(cmpbuf, MAXPATHLEN, basis_dir[j], fname);
            if (link_stat(cmpbuf, &sxp->st, 0) < 0 ||
!S_ISREG(sxp->st.st_mode))
                continue;
            switch (match_level) {
            case 0:
                best_match = j;
                match_level = 1;
                /* FALL THROUGH */
            case 1:
                if (!unchanged_file(cmpbuf, file, &sxp->st))
                    continue;
                best_match = j;
                match_level = 2;
                /* FALL THROUGH */
            case 2:
                if (!unchanged_attrs(cmpbuf, file, sxp)) {
                    free_stat_x(sxp);
                    continue;
                }
                best_match = j;
                match_level = 3;
                break;
            }
            break;
        } while (basis_dir[++j] != NULL);
It looks to me like on the first iteration of the loop, we match all the way
through to "match_level = 2" with the file from
"copy_dest/good", which has the
same content. The mtime doesn't match, though, so we break there.
On the second iteration of the loop, "match_level" is still 2, and we
only
compare the attributes with the file from "copy_dest/bad" (never the
content).
We then break from the loop and link the wrong file into dest.
I've attached my attempt at a patch to correct this.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jul-25  22:54 UTC
[Bug 12036] Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest flags produce incorrect behavior
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12036 --- Comment #2 from Chris Kuehl <ckuehl at ocf.berkeley.edu> --- Created attachment 12289 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=12289&action=edit proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.