similar to: Error 0400

Hi, we are the developers of an alternative to mkisofs: program xorriso from libburnia-project.org . The current development cycle is about support for creating bootable CDs, DVDs, BDs. So we look for testers and for advise about ISOLINUX specifics. The example from the ISOLINUX wiki is supposed to work if you replace "mkisofs" by "xorriso -as mkisofs". I.e: xorriso -as

High all, In WinXP, I have created file "image.iso" using mkisofs, but unable to postprocess with the "isohybrid". I worked as follows: cd F:\syslinux-4.05\utils F:\syslinux-4.05\utils> isohybrid F:\image.iso and received >'isohybrid' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. What next? Thanks in advance.

SYSLINUX 4.00 2010-06-28 EDD Load error - Boot error Booting from USB on old IBM T43 or newer Esprimo E5731E. No problems with version 3.86 and same usb-stick.

Hallo, H. Peter, Du meintest am 25.06.13: >> We could probably fabricate a script of some sort to check for the >> required version of gnu-efi, and skip it if not found, unless the >> user explicitly requested that the EFI files be built, in which case >> we'd error out. >> >> Thoughts? > Not really... let's just document "make bios". By

Hallo, Luke, Du meintest am 02.04.16: > Also, when I run testparm -svv | less I can find these four lines on > both the working and non-working servers: > server max protocol = SMB3 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = NT1 > client min protocol = CORE Perhaps a max protocol = NT1 in the global section helps. And

Currently the resize command is under filesystem, and takes a path to the mounted filesystem. This seems wrong to me. Shouldn''t it be under device, and take a path to a device to resize? Otherwise, how can a resize operation when you have multiple devices make any sense? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to

Is that with an active directory domain controller? On Apr 3, 2016 11:21 PM, "barış tombul" <bbtombul at gmail.com> wrote: > my conf win10 no problem: > client NTLMv2 auth = Yes > client lanman auth = No > server max protocol = SMB3_11 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = SMB3_11 > client min protocol = CORE > >

Hi Helmut, Thank you for your mail. The distribution is Debian linux 7.9. I am talking of a fresh installation, and of course of it's update after. Thank you for helping. Regards Le 19 avr. 2016 06:08, "Helmut Hullen" <Hullen at t-online.de> a écrit : > Hallo, Jules, > > Du meintest am 18.04.16: > > > Is it recommended to install the tarball or archive

Dear all, I wanna create a GNU/Linux that it boots from USB. I don't any idea on that. Can you introduce me a doc that i can use it & i can solve my problem? Cheers, -- ------------------------- Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh email address : mohsen at pahlevanzadeh.org web site : http://pahlevanzadeh.org IRC IM : m_pahlevanzadeh yahoo IM : linuxorbsd ----------------------------

I think the Syslinux 5.00 branch is now at the point where I believe it it is feature complete and should be able to replace the main Syslinux branch. As such, it is important that we get wider testing, and especially that people let us know if and where it breaks. As of right now, there aren't any known bugs...

Hallo, linux-btrfs, please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some configurations it doesn''t work as expected. My usual way: mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ... One call for some devices. Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label, and therefore some other programs

On Tue, 25 Jun, at 01:09:47PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Not really... let's just document "make bios". There's preliminary documentation in doc/building.txt. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Syslinux 3.84 has been released. This is a mixed minor new features/minor bug fixes release. Changes in 3.84: * SYSLINUX: make the DOS installer work for MS-DOS 7.x/8.x (Win9x/ME) again. * HDT: updated to version 0.3.6 (numerous changes.) * mboot.c32: now supports video mode setting if requested by the image. * MEMDISK: Fix floppy images of

Hallo, I wrote am 26.06.13: > Running "pxelinux": more problems than with 5.10. > 5.00-pre6: all worked fine > 5.10: the start menu (GUI) wasn't shown; "tab" showed the labels, and > the textual menus. Invoking the labels worked. > 6.00: no GUI start menu. "tab" showed the textual menus. Invoking > them seems to do nothing (after some

Dear samba list, Is it recommended to install the tarball or archive version of samba4 in production ? Or what will be please the best pratices ? Thank you for your advices Best Regards -- Jules HOUANTONON *Phone* : (00229) 97578914 *Email *: juleshoueto at gmail.com *Skype* : houantonon *linkedin* : www.linkedin.com/in/jhouantonon/en

On 04/19/2016 1:44 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Dale, > > Du meintest am 19.04.16: > >>> Found some more info: >>> >>> mount.cifs to mount shares from my DCs (samba 4.2.11) works >>> mount.cifs to mount shares from smbserver (also 4.2.11) does NOT >>> work. > [...] > >>> As for smb.conf options: similar on the DCs and the

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could help me, I have searched for some reason but cannot find any. After migrating from a previous samba-3.0.10 (I think) PDC server to a newer samba-3.0.23c server on Centos5, I have the strange problem that my XP clients no longer map all the drives listed in the logon.bat during logon, however if I run logon.bat manually after I'm logged in, all

Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style domain, with the Samba box operating as the PDC? -- Jason A. Nunnelley JasonN.com is my website - all opinions expressed were mine at some point.

Just compiled a custom kernel, but unable to mount a btrfs partition. It essentially says ''unrecognized filesystem''. What could be missing? # File systems # CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y # CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP is not set CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y

Hallo, "never change a running system" ... For some months I run btrfs unter kernel 3.2.5 and 3.2.9, without problems. Yesterday I compiled kernel 3.3.4, and this morning I started the machine with this kernel. There may be some ugly problems. Copying something into the btrfs "directory" worked well for some files, and then I got error messages (I''ve not