similar to: R CMD check -- non S3 method warning

Is putting a variable into a list a deep copy (and is tracemem the correct way to confirm)? warmstrong at krypton:~/dvl/R.packages$ R > x <- rnorm(1000) > tracemem(x) [1] "<0x3214c90>" > x.list <- list(x.in.list=x) tracemem[0x3214c90 -> 0x2af0a20]: > Is it possible to put a variable into a list without causing a deep copy (i.e. if you _really_ want the

I'm using nut-2.8.2 on FreeBSD 14.2 with an Eaton 5PX2200RT Five minutes after starting nut, I get this message within my ssh session: UPS heartbeat on battery It is not clear to me why it reports that. Here is the full output of a restart: [18:12 gw01 dvl ~] % sudo service nut restart Stopping nut. Waiting for PIDS: 2553. Network UPS

I've been working on a package that requires a shared library to be loaded. I have used the NAMESPACE file to load the library according to: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#Load%20hooks <http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#Load%20hooks> my shared library is "excelpoi.so" hence I have added "useDynLib(excelpoi)" to my NAMESPACE file.

Since, gcc was using upwards of 2gb of ram to compile my package, I just split all the functions into individual files. I guess I'm too clever for myself, because now I get hit with the "Argument list too long" error. Is there a way to deal with this aside from writing my own configure script (which could possibly feed the gcc commands one by one). -Whit RHEL 5 [whit at

On Sun, Dec 22, 2024, at 2:53 PM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser wrote: > I thought I could clear the Eaton 5PX battery message. I've failed. > > The following is based on > https://haefelfinger.ch/posts/2020/2020-09-23-reset-battery-alert-eaton-5p-ups/ > > I shutdown the UPS. I disconnected it from power. I disconnected both > the main battery and the external battery

Dear R-developers, I am currently developing an R package called RLadyBug. When developing under Linux "R CMD check ." works fine without a warning. However, when I do "Rcmd check ." under Windows (version 2.4.0 and earlier) I get a ?syntax error" when checking the examples. This puzzles me somewhat, because a manual source("RLadyBug-Ex.R") on Windows works

I thought I could clear the Eaton 5PX battery message. I've failed. The following is based on https://haefelfinger.ch/posts/2020/2020-09-23-reset-battery-alert-eaton-5p-ups/ I shutdown the UPS. I disconnected it from power. I disconnected both the main battery and the external battery pack. I pressed the power on button several times, until the clicking stopped.... I waited 10 minutes.

If I have an R script that I am executing from a command line in linux, do you know how I can return the value of the variable in my R script to the linux environment without writing it to a file in my R script and then reading the file through cat? For example, if I had a simple one line R script that just did string <- 'TEST', when I call /usr/local/bin/R

Dear r-help subscribers, A couple of weeks ago I sent the following message to the r-help mail list. It hasn't generated any response, and I could really use some help on this. Anyone able to help? Thanks again, Roger Dungan >> I am working on some survival analysis of some interval censored failure time data in R. I have done similar analysis before using PROC LIFEREG in SAS. In

Dear R-help, I am trying to estimate a Cox model with nested effects basing on the minimization of the overall AIC; I have two frailties terms, both gamma distributed. There is a error message (theta2 argument misses) and I don?t understand why. I would like to know what I have wrong. Thank you very much for your time. fitM7 <- coxph(Surv(lifespan,censured) ~ south + frailty(id,

Dear R users: I'm generating the following survival data: set.seed(123) n=200 #sample size x=rbinom(n,size=1,prob=.5) #binomial treatment v=rgamma(n,shape=1,scale=1) #gamma frailty w=rweibull(n,shape=1,scale=1) #Weibull deviates b=-log(2) #treatment's slope t=exp( -x*b -log(v) + log(w) ) #failure times c=rep(1,n) #uncensored indicator id=seq(1:n) #individual frailty indicator

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, at 6:31 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote: > >> Hope that helps. > > Not much unfortunately. > > Running this: > > net cache list > > will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with > real things, it could indicate where they're coming from. If it fails or > shows a cache

On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote: > Hope that helps. Not much unfortunately. Running this: net cache list will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with real things, it could indicate where they're coming from. If it fails or shows a cache full of nonsense, well that is also interesting. > > The original messages are long scrolled off the

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024, at 10:07 AM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 11:49 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> I check the spec'd net weight of the batteries with the actual weight of >> each arriving battery. > > On the website, they say 5.73 pounds (5 lbs 11.6 oz). > > Two of the batteries were 5 lbs 11 oz. The rest were all 10, 9, or 8 oz.

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 11:49 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote: > On 11/12/2024 10:58 AM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser wrote: >> Hello, >> >> nut recently told me that the batteries need replacing in my Eaton 5PX2200RT (ups) and 5PXEBM48RT (external battery pack). According to my notes, it has been just over 4 years since I installed them. Looking at on-line sales, these seem to use

Please can someone explain why I seem to get these contradictory results? choose(5,2) [1] 10 gamma(6)/(gamma(3)*gamma(4)) [1] 10 gamma(6)/(gamma(3)*gamma(4)) == choose(5,2) [1] TRUE # all's well so far. # now look what happens: gamma(21)/(gamma(6)*gamma(16)) == choose(20,5) [1] FALSE # check individual terms: gamma(21)/(gamma(6)*gamma(16)) [1] 15504 choose(20,5) [1] 15504 # so they are the

Hi, I want to create upper and lower 95% confidence intervals for a p-p plot of an empirical distribution with a theoretical gamma distribution. This is my code: x<-rgamma(100,shape=2, rate=1) # empirical data fitdistr(x,"gamma") # fit a gamma distribution dist<-pgamma(x,shape=1.9884256 ,rate=0.8765314 ) # fitted distribution, using the loglikelihood estimated parameters

Hi, I am trying to replicate Lambert (1992)'s simulation with zero-inflated Poisson models. The citation is here: @article{lambert1992zero, Author = {Lambert, D.}, Journal = {Technometrics}, Pages = {1--14}, Publisher = {JSTOR}, Title = {Zero-inflated {P}oisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing}, Year = {1992}} Specifically I am trying to recreate Table 2. But my

Hi! I would like to perform an F-Test over more than one variable within a generalized mixed model with Gamma-distribution and log-link function. For this purpose, I use the package mgcv. Similar tests may be done using the function "anova", as for example in the case of a normal distributed response. However, if I do so, the error message "error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) :

Dear all, I am relatively new to R and have had some difficulty in understanding an error i get when running a code to solve a system of non-linear equations, with four equations and two variables. This is my code: ALPHA <- c(-0.0985168033402, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4) BETA <- c(-0.0985168033402, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4) GAMMA <- c(0.3940672148378, 0.1, 0.15,