similar to: cryptic error message from R CMD check

Hello, On Windows XP using R 2.4.0pat (2006-10-19 r39674) from CRAN (sorry, no r-devel) R CMD check of R CMD build --binary fails if package has RCS folder in data map. This does not happen on my Debian GNU/Linux box with R 2.4.0 (2006-10-03). Is this a bug? Here is the transript from the command prompt C:\Programs\R>R CMD check test * checking for working latex ... OK * using log

Hi, sorry for this lengthy post. I am using R-2.0.0 on Unix, compiled. Overview: A) R CMD check: Unaccounted top-level text B) In which sections of *.Rd is LaTeX notation allowed, where *not*? C) Codoc mismatches and polyvalent parameters D) Successful R CMD INSTALL and R CMD build E) cp ../Rd.sty . is copy necessary? F) latex ./CWHstat-manual.tex runs into trouble When running >R CMD

Hi, sorry for this lengthy post. I am using R-2.0.0 on Unix, compiled. Overview: A) R CMD check: Unaccounted top-level text B) In which sections of *.Rd is LaTeX notation allowed, where *not*? C) Codoc mismatches and polyvalent parameters D) Successful R CMD INSTALL and R CMD build E) cp ../Rd.sty . is copy necessary? F) latex ./CWHstat-manual.tex runs into trouble When running >R CMD

The NEWS for R 2.3.0 states that "R CMD check works for packages whose package name is different from the directory name in which it is located." However that hasn't been my experience. I ran R CMD check on package sources located in a directory with the same name as the package and it worked as expected. Then I renamed the directory and tried again. The first attempt got stuck

Dear all, I'm puzzled by the error I get from R CMD check one of my packages. I'm running R CMD check with the --as-cran flag and it get the error both from running it from the command line as from within Rstudio. On the same machine R CMD check on my GRTS package (https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=1027) works fine. Any suggestions on how to fix this? I can send the source code

Hi, This is a follow up to: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-July/057921.html The Bioconductor daily builds have been reporting a lot of strange things lately on Windows using R-2.12. This started 2 or 3 months ago and things are not getting better with recent R-2.12. Here is a sample from today's build results. We use Windows Server 2003 R2 for the 32-bit builds, Windows

Hi, All: What might cause "R CMD check" to report, "could not find function" for a function that has long been in the 'fda' package? Both Jim Ramsay in Ottawa, Canada, and I in San Jose, CA, get this same error. I replicated it with a fresh, anonymous checkout from R-Forge (svn checkout svn://svn.r-forge.r-project.org/svnroot/fda). With this, I did

Hello, I have a problem with the checking and building of R packages that contain C or FORTRAN code. I have implemented R 2.3.1 (2006-06-01) and the corresponding toolset under Windows XP and Windows 2000. The MinGW compiler components are (exactly as recommended for R 2.3.1) gcc-core-3.4.5-20051220-1.tar.gz gcc-g++-3.4.5-20051220-1.tar.gz gcc-g77-3.4.5-20051220-1.tar.gz

Dear R-devel, One of our R-Forge developers pointed out that it is not possible to build packages under Windows using the R-Forge repository structure: a package resides in ./pkg - not in a directory with the same name as the package name. Under Linux 'R CMD build pkg' or 'R CMD check pkg' work pretty well (I think Kurt Hornik fixed that in R 2.5.1 or so) whereas under

I have a query after finding an error running Rtools on a Windows machine. I am trying to build an update to the R fda library using Rtools27 under Windows XP Pro. This is the current fda library on RForge: http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/fda Following R CMD build, R CMD check produces the following error in 00Install.out: installing R.css in F:/work/RForge/fda.Rcheck make: ***

Hello: What do you recommend I do to get past cryptic error messages from "R CMD check", complaining "No such file or directory"? The package is under SVN control, and I reverted to a version that passed "R CMD check", without eliminating the error. The "00install.out" file is short and bitter: cat: ./R/Copy: No such file or directory cat:

I'm having problems getting R CMD check to work correctly on Windows 7 (64 bit) in a package that uses C code. What I want to do is to be able to pass the equivalent of the "--force-biarch" option to check, but this is only supported for INSTALL. Background: I'm writing a package (RNetica) which forms a link between R and a third-party library (Netica.dll). The vendor supplies

I'm having problems getting R CMD check to work correctly on Windows 7 (64 bit) in a package that uses C code. What I want to do is to be able to pass the equivalent of the "--force-biarch" option to check, but this is only supported for INSTALL. Background: I'm writing a package (RNetica) which forms a link between R and a third-party library (Netica.dll). The vendor supplies

Hi, Why isn't 'R CMD check --force-multiarch' installing the package for all the architectures that are going to be checked? For some packages, it only installs for the default arch ('i386'). Then testing the package for 'x64' fails. For example, Output of R CMD check --force-multiarch fabia_1.5.0.tar.gz: ----------------------------------------------------------- *

Since, gcc was using upwards of 2gb of ram to compile my package, I just split all the functions into individual files. I guess I'm too clever for myself, because now I get hit with the "Argument list too long" error. Is there a way to deal with this aside from writing my own configure script (which could possibly feed the gcc commands one by one). -Whit RHEL 5 [whit at

R version 2.9.0 running on Centos (Red Hat linux). I have a pair of packages coxme and bdsmatrix. The latter is installed in my local library (I don't have permission for global install at work.) That is, it is in the location pointed to in R_LIBS_USER. In R, the command library(bdsmatrix) works fine. Coxme depends on bdsmatrix, in fact uses some cross-calls to it's C routines, which

Hi all. I've recently uploaded a package (bnlearn) to CRAN. It builds fine on both Linux (32 and 64 bit) and Windows, but fails on MacOSX ix86 because of C90 vs C99 issues: http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-patched-macosx-ix86/bnlearn-00install.html Since I've no MacOSX machine at hand, I would like to ask you: why is C99 not the default for gcc on MacOSX ix86? Is it safe to

Hi R-devels, recently, we have seen a new warning by "R CMD check" appearing for the devel-version of our package distrEx available on r-forge, e.g. as *|install.packages("/distrEx/",repos="http://r-forge.r-project.org")|* Here is the warning: %--------------------- [...snip ...] * checking for unstated dependencies in R code ... WARNING .get_S4_methods_list():

I have a samll package that works well and complies nicly on WinXP, using R-2.4.1 Now I want to add a document so i make a folder inst\doc and put the .tex and .pdf in there. But the complation then crashes. Is this because the installin expects some file to be present in inst if an inst folder is there? This is how the thing progress is on my command promp:

Dear all, I am trying to build a home-made package (log2html) to log R output to an HTML file. The package can be build successfully under Solaris, however I am unable to build the system under Windows 2000 Professional. I read (and tried to follow to the letter) Duncan Murdoch's "Building R for Windows" (http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/), in combination with the newest