Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints"
2005 Dec 05
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
On Friday 02 December 2005 18:20, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> What shells are these?
Bash, mostly, but also ksh and zsh; sorry for not mentioning this. I now see
that the root account usually does not change the behaviour of cd, so we may
as well forget about the matter. My thought was: if a small change helps
avoid this problem (which I think can occur easily enough), it could be
2005 Dec 02
0
(PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints stuff to stdout
What shells are these? You don't give an example that causes trouble, and
in particular no way to reproduce this.
The behaviour you describe is prohibited by the POSIX standard, so the
problem would appear to be with the unnamed shell. I can see how it could
happen if a user redefines 'cd', but then a user could redefine all the
commands in his OS and we have to make some
2005 Dec 02
0
R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints stuff to stdout ... (PR#8363)
--Boundary_(ID_erFAa+o6kWefQxXf6GD2RA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-disposition: inline
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Dear all,
I came across puzzling behaviour of R CMD INSTALL, which I tracked down to the
fact that in some shells (or in some user customizations of them), the cd
command prints out the new directory. As a result, the $pkgs variable gets a
2005 Dec 05
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Philip Lijnzaad wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 18:20, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> What shells are these?
>
> Bash, mostly, but also ksh and zsh; sorry for not mentioning this.
I still don't know what you did to be able to reproduce this (and I did
ask). And as it is a shell script running under /bin/sh, it must be
whatever is masquerading as
2007 Feb 16
1
Still unsure of the Dag Repos for CentOS 3
I have read the Wiki for the Yum stuff, and tried to pay attention to the
variations for Centos 3/Centos 4 mentioned, but for the life of me, I can't
seem to get the Dag repo working properly on my CentOS 3 system. I have
installed the rpmforge rpm, but this doesn't seem to do much. It does
create(I think it created it) the yum.repos.d folder, and I edited the Dag
repos file to be
2009 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote:
> I am hitting this assertion:
>
> assert(I != VRBaseMap.end() && "Node emitted out of order - late");
>
> I am not sure why this assertion is being triggered or what I changed that
> is causing it.
>
> This is asserting when SDValue is FrameIndexSDNode 1.
>
> I
2010 Jun 22
0
action-matrix-patch (was Re: antispam Clarification about spam/trash/unsure folders)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Meinst du mit "Hosting" jetzt nur die technische Komponente? Das ist mir
Nee, sorry. Ich meinte beides.
> eigentlich egal, ich kann dir auch gerne Zugriff auf den git tree geben
> und so.
Hm, git ist ein Buch mit sieben Sigel. Ich habe CVS, Subversion und hg im
Einsatz, aber git
2009 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
I am hitting this assertion:
assert(I != VRBaseMap.end() && "Node emitted out of order - late");
I am not sure why this assertion is being triggered or what I changed
that is causing it.
This is asserting when SDValue is FrameIndexSDNode 1.
I don't have any code that modified frameindices until my overloaded
RegisterInfo function.
I've attached the bc file.
2005 Oct 04
1
"Survey" package and NAMCS data... unsure of specification
Hello, all.
I wanted to use the "survey" package to analyze data from the National
Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, and am having some difficulty translating
the analysis keywords from one package (Stata) to the other (R). The data
were collected using a multistage probability sampling, and there are
variables included to identify the sampling units and weights. Documentation
from the
2009 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Don't generate debug info at this time (you can use "opt
-strip-debug")? :-) Otherwise, I'm not sure.
-bw
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote:
> Is there any known method/hack of bypassing this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
2008 Nov 13
1
readPDF() -- unsure how to install xpdf to make this work?
Dear R-Help,
I need to convert a set of '.pdf' files into an equivalent set of
'.txt' files. This is so that i can do some text mining on the
content.
In the latest R-News letter (http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/
Rnews_2008-2.pdf), the package 'tm' for text mining is mentioned. In
that lovely package, there is a function called 'readPDF()'. In order
to use
2009 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Is there any known method/hack of bypassing this?
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Bill Wendling
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:07 PM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>
2009 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Other than not using debugging ('-g' and the like), not really. :-( I
think that Devang is actively working on fixing this, though. It might
not be too much longer.
-bw
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote:
> This did not seem to work, any other ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at
2009 Jan 30
1
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Well, I thought I knew how to fix the problem, but it seems my changes
didn't help at all. The frame index is being created when
FuncInfo->set() is called in SelectionDAGISel::runOnFunction().
This occurs at line 293 in SelectionDAGBuild.cpp when dealing with the
alloca instructions.
I've found the CopyToReg that is being issued occurs in LowerCALL and it
is this one that fails. When I
2009 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
This did not seem to work, any other ideas?
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Bill Wendling
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:26 PM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Don't generate debug info at this time (you can use "opt
-strip-debug")?
2009 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote:
> Ok, I've had time to track this down a little bit more and I seem to
> have found another case where it fails. This is occurring during
> Schedulur->EmitSchedule() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp:695. The problem
> seems
> to be that somehow the CopyToReg part of the switch statement in
> ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a
2015 Aug 12
1
imap segfaults when using antispam plugin, and moving mail to an 'unsure' folder.
I put up a question on serverfault first, which has the details,
including a stack trace:
http://serverfault.com/questions/713687/dovecot-antispam-error-storing-mail
. Details also copied below.
Is this a known bug? If I built dovecot from source rather than using
the Ubuntu 14.04 packages, would I expect that to help? Are there any
configuration details that might be relevant? (dovecot -n
2009 Jan 27
3
[LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why
Ok, I've had time to track this down a little bit more and I seem to
have found another case where it fails. This is occurring during
Schedulur->EmitSchedule() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp:695. The problem seems
to be that somehow the CopyToReg part of the switch statement in
ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a FrameIndex as its second operand. This is
especially problematic because the code is either
1999 Jul 15
1
R: ts - objects
Hello,
I faced some difficulties using time series objects.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Why is the time data changed, when I, e.g., apply sqrt(arrts), but
not
when arrts^0.5 ?
This is my examples time series:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> arrts
Time Series:
Start = 3
End = 23
Frequency
2009 May 16
1
gluster-2.0.1, mandriva-2008.1-x86_64, libtool, lt_unset
I've encountered a new problem building gluster-2.0.1 that I did not
have with gluster-2.0.0rc8. This is on a mandriva-2008.1-x86_64 system.
../../libtool: line 466: CDPATH: command not found
../../libtool: line 1144: func_opt_split: command not found
libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2.2.6a-4, but
the
libtool: definition of this LT_INIT comes from an older