similar to: Post processing need for installing packages in rpms.

Hi, Paul Johnson asked: While I'm on the RPM subject, can I ask an R RPM packaging question? I want the R RPM to install so that post install then R starts and runs > update.packages() as well as install.packages(c("Design","Hmisc","lmtest","car","rgl","effects")) well, you get the idea. I want to add

Dear R-helpers, I'm learning how to compile R packages with fortran routines and use the acepack source as an example. After some hiccups (Guido told me about the need to set make_mode=UNIX) I got to the following: `make pkg-acepack' runs without error (see below), but it does not * compile any .f file in acepack/src * (hence) try to create any dll file or libs (I'm

Full_Name: Andrew Barclay Version: 0.63.4 OS: Solaris 2.7 Submission from: (NULL) (170.140.252.158) The Makefile in src/library gets the following error from our Solaris 2.7 make when making 'docs': make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `*/man/*.Rd' Current working directory R-release/src/library It doesn't seem to appreciate shell wildcards in the

I have a comma-separated data file in which trailing commas sometimes occur. I am using strsplit to extract the data from this file, and it seems great except in cases with trailing comma characters. The example below illustrates. What I'd like is to get a fourth element in the answer, being an empty string just like the second element. Is there a way I can express my patter (or perhaps

The rpm target was added after 1.8 was released so I guess you're not using CVS version. I also made several changes to the spec file which you might be interested in. The current version is attached. Reid. On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:02 +1200, David Kuestler wrote: > There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile. > My spec file is derived from the included spec file

I am trying to build an RPM for Apache-2.4.7-1 on Centos-6.5-i86_64. I am using mock. The are three build dependencies that I am trying to resolve. One, mod_socache_dc / distcache, I have simply removed from the spec file. The other two are arp and apr-utils. Since httpd-2.4.7 needs arp >= 1.4 I got the two latter requirements from http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.4.7-deps.tar.bz2

Hey all, I'm attempting to build a spec file of php 5.6.7 - the latest stable - into an rpm. And it's failing with this set of errors: Processing files: php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rc.d/init.d/php-fpm error: Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/phar -> /home/bluethundr/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64/usr/bin/phar.phar warning: File listed twice:

As with 0.62.3, when I install my dse package with documentation in 0.62.4 the html help in R/doc/html/function.html gets clobbered so that the regular R function help is not available. I was postponing a revised version of my dse library install in the hope that this might be fixed. Does anyone know if this is a simple problem that I can hope will be fixed soon, or should I consider a

Dear All, I have tried to install the tensor package (from: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES.html#tensor ), using the comand: " shell("Rcmd INSTALL tensor") " then I got the following mensage: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- make: Entering directory `/d/bin/cran/rw1022/src/gnuwin32' make DLLNM= EXTRADOCS= \

I have my DSE library working fairly well now with 0.62.1. It required a few changes because of the changes to R INSTALL and "xxx<-" functions. I would like to tar up a new version soon but 1/ for testing I have been using a kludge in .First.lib to select the first element of section - since I happen to know that is the element I need given the way I have $RLIBS set. This argument

I have a fresh installation of R from debian unstable packages. The html index found in /usr/lib/R/doc/html/index.html works in Mozilla and under the link of 'packages' on this page I have a list and corresponding links. However, it appears that not all packages I have installed from available deb files via apt-get, will get their link updated to this package index. Specifically, from

These are the changes I made to the spec file related to gobject bindings and gobject introspection. TBH I wasn't sure how to properly package this. Rich. diff --git a/libguestfs.spec b/libguestfs.spec index 095a848..1b6e43d 100644 --- a/libguestfs.spec +++ b/libguestfs.spec @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Summary: Access and modify virtual machine disk images Name: libguestfs Epoch:

There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile. My spec file is derived from the included spec file however it did not honour the DESTDIR, hence the changes. On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:43 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi David, > > On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 15:56 +1200, David Kuestler wrote: > > I have built llvm as a Fedora Core 5 package : > >

Il giorno dom, 19/02/2017 alle 21.17 -0700, Jeff Sadowski via samba ha scritto: > I was never able to build it in a way I have rebuild samba from rpm source on Centos 7 (samba 4.4.4) and Fedora (samba 4.5.5) with this procedure: > > [lesca at dodo rpmbuild]$ cat rebuild.txt > # > > # Install Development ... > sudo yum -y groupinstall 'Development Tools' > # sudo

Hello, in order to compile sppex on my Fedora, I had to do the following changes. Please consider installing them to the main tree. Thanks for your work, Stepan Kasal --- /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/Speex.spec 2006-02-15 13:13:48.000000000 +0100 +++ /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/Speex.spec.new 2006-05-10 11:00:25.000000000 +0200 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %name Version: %ver Release: %rel -Copyright: BSD

I was trying to learn cross building an R pcakage for windows on my linux machine. I picked a relatively small library gee to test. I downloaded the cross-tools and put them in my path, jyan at ludwig:/a3/jyan/src/R-1.2.1/src/gnuwin32$ echo $PATH /home/jyan/cross-tools/bin:/home/jyan/cross-tools/i386-mingw32msvc/bin: /usr/lib:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games Following the

Am 13.03.2015 um 11:23 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 12 Mar 2015, at 21:09, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/stats/libstats_mail.so >> >> why in the world a new sub-directory containing just one so-file enforcing pakcage buildsers to change SPEC files? > > So that external plugins can add more files in there and extend

On 12 Mar 2015, at 21:09, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > /usr/lib64/dovecot/stats/libstats_mail.so > > why in the world a new sub-directory containing just one so-file enforcing pakcage buildsers to change SPEC files? So that external plugins can add more files in there and extend the available statistics.

From: Simon Courtois <scourtois at linagora.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Courtois <scourtois at linagora.com> --- src/app/controllers/vm_controller.rb | 19 ++++++++++++++++- src/app/views/vm/_form.rhtml | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++--- src/db/migrate/044_add_virtio_to_vm_and_nic.rb | 11 ++++++++++ src/public/stylesheets/components.css | 5

Am 31.05.2017 um 16:35 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 31 May 2017, at 16.53, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net > <mailto:h.reindl at thelounge.net>> wrote: >> >> LTO build is as broken as 2.2.30 >> >> libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "lib10_quota_plugin.la" && ln -s >> "../lib10_quota_plugin.la"