Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "Random.Rd"
2004 Nov 29
1
Reasons not to answer very basic questions in a straightforwa rd way; was: Re: creating a sequence of object names
I'd like to make just a couple of points:
R-help is considered by quite a few people to be "high-traffic". As such,
many have low appetite for very basic questions. (I wouldn't call them
"silly".) In many cases such questions are answered by pointing to a
particular function help page or manual section. In this particular case,
it's probably not at the very
2015 Aug 12
2
download.file() on ftp URL fails in windows with default download method
We were also able to reproduce the issue on Windows Server 2012. If there's anything we can do to help please let me know; Elliot Waingold (CC'd here) can provide access to the VM we used for testing if that's of any help.
# David Smith
--
David M Smith <davidsmi at microsoft.com>
R Community Lead, Revolution Analytics (a Microsoft company)?
Tel: +1 (312) 9205766 (Chicago IL,
2009 Apr 11
0
_Possible_ work-round for normalizePath error (was Re: [Rd] Package (PR#13475))
>>> Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> 04/10/09 4:21 PM >>>
>Well, you need to ask Symantec to fix Norton, hence this is the
>wrong address.
That would not help other R users who were looking in the archives for
help with what looked like a mysterious normalizePath error, would it?
As I said, the principal intent of the posting was to point to a
2015 Aug 08
2
download.file() on ftp URL fails in windows with default download method
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Uwe Ligges" <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>, "R-devel at r-project.org" <r-devel at r-project.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 3:57:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] download.file() on ftp URL fails in windows with default download method
>
>
2006 Mar 14
1
New simpleExit() condition (Was: Re: Can example() code stop the example without generating an error?)
On 3/14/06, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de> wrote:
> Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anyone know if it is possible to write example code (in Rd
> > examples) such that one can stop the example without generating an
> > error? Example:
> >
> > code A
> > if (cond)
> > niceStop()
> > code B
2005 Oct 06
1
problem with installing a package
I do have full access to that directory. I have the
bbHist package in c:/PROGRA~1/R/rw2011/library/bbHist
directory. Then under the library directory I did
check and build. Here's what I got:
$ R CMD check bbHist
* checking for working latex ... OK
* using log directory
'c:/progra~1/r/rw2011/library/bbHist.Rcheck'
* using R version 2.1.1, 2005-06-20
* checking for file
2015 Aug 12
0
download.file() on ftp URL fails in windows with default download method
Hi David,
----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Smith" <davidsmi at microsoft.com>
> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>, "Uwe Ligges" <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>, "Elliot Waingold"
> <Elliot.Waingold at microsoft.com>
> Cc: "R-devel at r-project.org" <r-devel at r-project.org>
2004 May 27
2
Rcmd check, windows xp, perl (2)
Thank you for your help. I??m sorry that I found not the right
entries in the R-devel. Now, I have again a problem.
After installing all needed things I have run
Rcmd INSTALL -l ../mypkg and respectively
make mypkg
By running Rcmd check I get following message:
* checking for working latex ...Error: environment
variable TMPDIR not set (or set to unusable value) and no
default
2008 Mar 31
1
unexpected GAM result - at least for me!
Hi
I am afraid i am not understanding something very fundamental.... and does not matter how much i am looking into the book "Generalized Additive Models" of S. Wood i still don't understand my result.
I am trying to model presence / absence (presence = 1, absence = 0) of a species using some lidar metrics (i have 4 of these). I am using different models and such .... and when i
2015 Aug 11
0
download.file() on ftp URL fails in windows with default download method
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
> To: "Uwe Ligges" <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
> Cc: "R-devel at r-project.org" <r-devel at r-project.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 4:02:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] download.file() on ftp URL fails in windows with default download method
2009 Jan 29
1
In Rd: \describe \itemize and \item
I rebuilt a test version of my yaImpute package using Uwe Ligges' windows
build service.
I got this reply: Check result: OK
R version 2.9.0 Under development (unstable) (2009-01-27 r47756)
Here is the issue: I have the following construct in help files (this
example relates to "data"):
\format{
A data frame with 847 rows and 29 columns: \cr\cr
Ground based measurements of
2004 Aug 13
4
(PR#7163) Install packages does not work on Win2003 serv er
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Ligges [SMTP:ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 5:38 PM
> To: Walke, Rainer
> Cc: R-devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] (PR#7163) Install packages does not work on Win2003
> server
>
> Walke, Rainer wrote:
>
> > >a) It works for me.
> > >b) If it works for you on some Windows
2009 Mar 05
1
Bug in Rdconv(.pm) (PR#13575)
For the record (and as privately discussed with Brian Ripley), happens
with all recent versions of R including R-devel from today:
Consider a simple a.Rd file containing the lines
==================
\name{a}
\title{a}
\value{\code{a} \code{\link[a]{a}} \pkg{a}
\item{a}{a}
}
==================
with these lines, I get, e.g.:
==================
R CMD Rdconv --type="txt" a.Rd
a
2005 Oct 05
0
Ad: Re: Ad: Re: R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180)
Dette er en melding med flere deler i MIME-format.
--=_alternative 004C4E4A00257091_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Yes.
so (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 = (x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8)^8 ?
and there is a difference in
(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2
and
(x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)
althoug the resulting formulas are the same, or?
This fikses my problem, but R still crashes for the
2008 Aug 20
5
GAM-binomial logit link
Dear all,
I'm using a binomial distribution with a logit link function to fit a GAM model. I have 2 questions about it.
First i am not sure if i've chosen the most adequate distribution. I don't have presence/absence data (0/1) but I do have a rate which values vary between 0 and 1. This means the response variable is continuous even if within a limited interval. Should i use
2011 Jan 27
1
Minor typo in influence.measures.Rd ?
Dear list,
There is, I believe, a minor typo in the example section of
influence.measures.Rd. In the final example the word `does` appears
where I suspect `dose` is required:
I couldn't remember exactly what format patches should be in, so here is
one as diff would produce:
Index: devel/src/library/stats/man/influence.measures.Rd
2015 Dec 30
1
typo in src/library/stats/man/family.Rd: names of 'validmu' and 'valideta' ??
under "Details" (version 2015-11-29 r69717; not quite cutting-edge,
but nothing has changed in src/library/stats/man/family.Rd in 5 months
[sorry for using the Github mirror, but I prefer the interface ...
<https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/trunk/src/library/stats/man/family.Rd>])
it says:
valid.mu: logical function. Returns ?TRUE? if a mean vector ?mu? is
within the
2010 Mar 05
0
references to (1) R source code in svn repo within .Rd file and (2) to C source code in comments in R code using .Internal() /.Primitive()
Hi R-devels,
recently I wanted to quickly look up a C implementation
in R-Core code in the official subversion repository;
more specifically the code was called from R by means of the .Internal()
interface.
And: yes, I did read Uwe Ligges' article in R News,
R Help Desk: Accessing the sources. R News, 6(4):43-45, October 2006
In the end I succeeded, using grep and the like to search the
2005 Oct 05
0
Ad: Re: Ad: Re: R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8181)
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 Hallgeir.Grinde at elkem.no wrote:
> Yes.
> so (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 = (x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8)^8 ?
Yes in the sense that the simplified formula given by terms() is the same.
> and there is a difference in
> (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2
> and
> (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)
> althoug the resulting formulas are the same, or?
The first is reduced to the
2007 Feb 01
1
prop.test.Rd References patch
Hi all,
Presuming that my reply on r-help this morning was correct, attached is
a patch file against the current svn trunk version of prop.test.Rd to
add the references for the methods.
Any corrections are welcome.
Regards,
Marc Schwartz