similar to: [R] problems with postscript device (PR#336)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[R] problems with postscript device (PR#336)"

1999 Nov 23
3
problems with postscript device
Hi! The postscript device in 0.90 does not produce symbols (pch=) as it should. E.g.: postscript(file="test.ps",width=8,height=6.4,horizontal=FALSE) plot(1:10,1:10,pch=1:5) legend(1,9,letters[1:5],pch=1:5) dev.off() The result looks quite different compared to the X-windows version. The symbol 1 (pch=1) is much to small, while the other symbols seem to big. Is it a bug? How can I
1999 Nov 24
1
[R] problems with postscript device (PR#341)
From: "Wolfgang Koller" <koller2@fgr.wu-wien.ac.at> Organization: University of Economics, Vienna Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 16:29:22 CET (+0100) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT CC: r-bugs@biostat.ku.dk, r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch References: <153DF9230E8@fgr.wu-wien.ac.at> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail
1999 Nov 27
1
size of text and numbers in graphs (PR#349)
Hi! Since installation of R 0.90 there are problems with the size of text and numbers also in the x11-device (I reported about similar problems with the postscript device recently). For numbers and letters a different size is used: plot(1:10,1:10,type="n") text(2,8,"F5F5F5F5F5") text(2,7,"F5F5F5F5F5",cex=2) The same problem is also found in the postscript
1999 Nov 27
1
size of text and numbers in graphs (PR#349)
Hi! Since installation of R 0.90 there are problems with the size of text and numbers also in the x11-device (I reported about similar problems with the postscript device recently). For numbers and letters a different size is used: plot(1:10,1:10,type="n") text(2,8,"F5F5F5F5F5") text(2,7,"F5F5F5F5F5",cex=2) The same problem is also found in the postscript
2000 Jun 15
2
dataframes and factors
Dear R-List, I have a dataframe X containing factor f and numeric variable x1, x2, ... I want to create a new dataframe (or possibly a matrix) that gives statistics (e.g. sum) for the variables x1, x2, ... in each group defined by factor f. What is the simplest way to do this? I tried: attach(X) Z <- data.frame(f=levels(f),x1=as.vector(lapply(split(x1,f),sum))) and stumbled on: Error
1999 Dec 07
1
Bug list summary (automatic post)
================================================= This is an automated summary of the status of the R-bugs repository. Note that this may be neither complete nor perfectly correct at any given instance: Not all bugs are reported, and some reported bugs may have been fixed, but the repository not yet updated. Some bug fixes are difficult to verify because they pertain to specific hardware or
1999 Jul 06
2
eval(), expression()
Dear R-Users! My aim is to produce boxplots without the outliers included in the plot. I started to write a function that looks something like: myboxplot <-function(x,fa) { bpdata <- boxplot(x~fa,plot=FALSE) bpnames <- names(bpdata) for (JJ in bpnames) { command <- paste("bpdata$",JJ,"$out <- numeric(0)",sep=""); eval(command) }
2000 Apr 03
1
window(): feature request
Dear R-developpers, currently the function window shows the following behaviour, if start or end is out of range: > x <- ts(1:14,start=c(1950,2),frequency=4) > y <- window(x,start=c(1950,1),end=c(1953,4)) Warning messages: 1: start value not changed in: window.default(x, ...) 2: end value not changed in: window.default(x, ...) Instead of this I would like it to fill with NAs the
1999 Dec 07
1
using weights in lm()
Hello! When I know the vector of the variance of the disturbances (i.e. the structure of heteroskedasticity), say Var(u_{i})=v_{i}, what is the weights I should use as argument to lm(): M <- lm(y~x,weigths=1/v) or M <- lm(y~x,weights=1/(v^0.5)) ??? In the help pages I did not find a clear answer to this question, so please could someone help me! Thanks, Wolfgang Koller
1999 Jul 28
1
skewness, kurtosis
Dear R-Users and Developpers, Currently R does not include functions to compute the skewness and kurtosis. I programmed it myself in the following way, but probably *real* programmers/statisticians can do that better: mykurtosis <- function(x) { m4 <- mean((x-mean(x))^4) kurt <- m4/(sd(x)^4)-3 kurt } myskewness <- function(x) { m3 <- mean((x-mean(x))^3) skew <-
2003 Apr 04
2
biplot
Dear list, I want to perform a biplot, using customized titels for the x and y axis. Setting xlab="" and ylab="" resulted in an error, e.g.: > data(USArrests) > biplot(princomp(USArrests),xlab="",ylab="") Error in biplot.default(t(t(scores[, choices])/lam), t(t(x$loadings[, : length of dimnames[1] not equal to array extent > How do I
1999 Dec 08
1
plot math - segfault and "frac", "^" bug(s).. (PR#365)
MM> I've sent two bug reports that both haven't been forwarded to R-devel MM> and haven't should up at the jitterbug repository. MM> ?? MM> Martin Well, actually only one [the other went to R-core alone] Here it is : From: Martin Maechler <maechler@sophie> To: R-bugs Subject: plot math - segfault and "frac", "^" bug(s).. Date: 8
1999 Dec 08
0
plot math - segfault and "frac", "^" bug(s).. (PR#368)
[this didn't go out at noon time during our e-mail storm...] In R versions 0.65, 0.90.0, and the current "pre-release", both on Linux and Solaris (the segfault at least) [with x11() , but most probably not device dependent]. The following shows it all : plot(1,type='n') ## Frac doesn't shrink properly... text(.7,1.3, expression( frac(7,4) == 1 *
1999 Dec 08
0
plot math - segfault and "frac", "^" bug(s).. (PR#367)
This is in R versions 0.65, 0.90.0, and the current "pre-release", both on Linux and Solaris [with x11() , but most probably not device dependent]. The following shows it all : plot(1,type='n') ## Frac doesn't shrink properly... text(.7,1.3, expression( frac(7,4) == 1 * frac(3,4)), cex=1) text(.7,1.2, expression( frac(7,4) == 1 * frac(3,4)), cex=3)
2000 Jan 21
0
Bug list summary (automatic post)
================================================= This is an automated summary of the status of the R-bugs repository. Note that this may be neither complete nor perfectly correct at any given instance: Not all bugs are reported, and some reported bugs may have been fixed, but the repository not yet updated. Some bug fixes are difficult to verify because they pertain to specific hardware or
2000 Apr 03
1
cbind.ts(),ts.union() (PR#508)
Full_Name: Wolfgang Koller Version: 1.0.0 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (137.208.7.48) > data(UKLungDeaths) > ts.union(mdeaths, fdeaths,dframe=TRUE) Error in names<-.default(*tmp*, value = nmsers) : names attribute must be the same length as the vector > cbind(mdeaths, fdeaths,dframe=TRUE) Error in names<-.default(*tmp*, value = nmsers) : names attribute
1999 Nov 01
0
as.data.frame(NULL) & as.data.frame(list()) & bug in dput(.)
{Connected to the bug report on expand.grid(.) and my fix to it..} [Following the spirt of arrays where parts of dim() can be 0] I would like for these two to give the "same" or at least, both to give a data.frame with 0 observations of 0 variables. Currently [R 0.65.1 and pre-0.90] > str(d0 <- as.data.frame(list())) `data.frame': 0 obs. of 0 variable: list()
2001 Jan 10
1
eval() bug in plot.formula() ?
I don't have time now to investigate myself, and I'm not feeling like deciding myself if the following is a bug: myplot <- function(dat, cex = 1.2, ...) { if(!is.data.frame(dat <- as.data.frame(dat))) stop("`dat' must be a data.frame") if(any(is.na(match(c("x","y"), names(dat))))) stop("`dat' must have a `x' and a
2000 Jan 01
0
Re: Tests in linear regression
>>>>> "FrSa" == SABIDO =?iso-8859-1?Q?MART=CDN?= <SABIDO> writes: FrSa> Hello. I am a student from Spain. We are working on 'R' (a FrSa> programming environment for data analysis and graphics). Our FrSa> teacher has told as to make a job about tests in non complet rank FrSa> linear regresion models (I hope you could understand
1999 Dec 08
0
excuse the repeated mailings..
Our sys.admin fixed one important (NIS) problem and accidentally simultaneously badly broke part of sendmail's functioning. Unfortunately, this lasted ~ 40 minutes, and somehow sendmail just "thought" it had to resend these messages several times (up to 8 x) that came in during that 40 minutes' period. Accept our (math.ethz.ch)'s apologies... Martin Maechler <maechler