Martin Maechler
1999-Nov-01 08:39 UTC
as.data.frame(NULL) & as.data.frame(list()) & bug in dput(.)
{Connected to the bug report on expand.grid(.) and my fix to it..} [Following the spirt of arrays where parts of dim() can be 0] I would like for these two to give the "same" or at least, both to give a data.frame with 0 observations of 0 variables. Currently [R 0.65.1 and pre-0.90] > str(d0 <- as.data.frame(list())) `data.frame': 0 obs. of 0 variable: list() > dput(d0) ## BUG NULL > as.data.frame(NULL) Error in as.data.frame.default(NULL) : can't coerce NULL into a data.frame and > str(dn0 <- as.data.frame(numeric(0))) `data.frame': 0 obs. of 1 variable: $ x: num > dput(dn0) structure(list(x = numeric(0)), .Names = "x", class = "data.frame") (S-plus 5.1 is almost the same, but uses "X" instead of "x" for a name) ----- Comments? If I don't get any, I'd only change as.data.frame such that as.data.frame(NULL) === as.data.frame(list()) |--> 0 x 0 data.frame Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum LEO D10 Leonhardstr. 27 ETH (Federal Inst. Technology) 8092 Zurich SWITZERLAND phone: x-41-1-632-3408 fax: ...-1228 <>< -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._