similar to: error in split...

Thanks for the report. It is *not* a problem of the quotes (but how on earth do you get such horrible factor levels with these extra quotes ?) As a matter of fact, (and as ?bug.report tries to say) the bug report should go to R-bugs, not R-devel; and preferrably be completely reproducible (using builtin or constructed data) Here it is, in its reproducible form a <- gl(3,2,11,

Hello all! I have a problem to group my data (years) in 10 years classes. For example for year year decade 1598 1590-1600 1599 1590-1600 1600 1590-1600 1601 1600-1610 --- my is like this> [1] 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 [16] 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 [31] 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633

I have been trying to do a nls model and gives me the error of a nonnumeric argument table(file="c:/tt2.txt",header=T) > fit.model <- nls(TT~60*(1+alpha*(v/c)^beta),data=tt2, start=list(alpha=1, beta=3, v=1000)) Error in v/c : non-numeric argument to binary operator > is.numeric(tt2) [1] FALSE > is.character(tt2) [1] FALSE > as.numeric(tt2) Error: (list)

I've got a system with 5 pri circuits configured into a CFAS group with a primary and secondary d channel. There are three TE410P cards in the system. The 5 circuit span are located as follows: circuit 1 on span 5 circuit 2 on span 1 circuit 3 on span 6 circuit 4 on span 2 circuit 5 on span 9 primary d chan is on chan 24 of span 5 (chan 120) secondary d chan is on chan 24 of span 1 (chan

Hello all, I'll cut to the chase -- several weeks ago, I thought I had an upstart configuration file that would start Samba4 when the VM was turned on; but it turns out I was wrong. At the time there was nothing on the wiki about it (the links were broken). The script I thought was working was simply: start on runlevel [2345] exec /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba In any case, looking at the

Hello all! I have a problem to extract values greater that for example 1820. I try this code: x[x[,1]>1820,]->x1 Please help me! Thank you! The data structure is: structure(c(2.576, 1.728, 3.434, 2.187, 1.928, 1.886, 1.2425, 1.23, 1.075, 1.1785, 1.186, 1.165, 1.732, 1.517, 1.4095, 1.074, 1.618, 1.677, 1.845, 1.594, 1.6655, 1.1605, 1.425, 1.099, 1.007, 1.1795, 1.3855, 1.4065, 1.138, 1.514,

libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 64 libswfdec/swfdec_file_reference.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_load_object.c | 81 libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie_as.c | 19 libswfdec/swfdec_system_security.c | 1 test/trace/Makefile.am | 72

Dear R help, I have some readings in three dimensions (x, y, z) and an amplitude for each. I'd like to visualize the data using ggplot, using tile plots, as I have some additional point data I would like to eventually overlay on the tile plots. I would like to subset the data by sections, slices if you will, in the z dimension, and plot the data for that slice. I can do all of this, but am

Hello, R users, I have two factors (treat, section) anova design experiment where there are 3 replicates. The objective of the experiment is to test if there is significant difference of yield between top (section 9 to 11) and bottom (section 9 to 11) of the fruit tree under treatment. I found that there are interaction between two factors. I wonder if I can contrast means from levels of

Hello, R experts, If I understand Ted's anwser correctly, then I can not contrast the mean yields between sections 1-8 and 9-11 under "Trt" but I can contrast mean yields for sections 1-3 and 6-11 because there exists significant interaction between two factors (Trt:section4, Trt:section5). Could I use the commands below to test the difference between sections 1-3 and 6-11 ?

I am confused whether Student's sleep data "show the effect of two soporific drugs" or Control against Treatment (one drug). The reason is the next: > require(stats) > data(sleep) > attach(sleep) > extra[group==1] numeric(0) > group [1] Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt Trt [20] Trt Levels: Ctl Trt > sleep$group [1] 1 1 1 1 1

In trying to track down a weird tree log problem I wanted to make sure that the free space cache was actually valid, which we currently have no way of doing. So this patch adds a bunch of support for the free space cache code and then a checker to fsck. Basically we go through and if we can actually load the free space cache then we will walk the extent tree and verify that the free space cache

I have just got a Cisco 7941G and am experiencing the exact same problem (phone is requesting .tlv file from TFTP server and never asks for .cnf.xml file). The phone originally had SCCP on it, but I downloaded and flashed with the latest Cisco SIP image (8.4(3) released 2009-01-13). In reading your message below, it looks like you were going to try an incremental upgrade?did you have any

Hi all, I'm using SVM to classify data (2 classes) and I get strange results : > model = svm(x, y, probability = TRUE) > pred = predict(model, x, decision.values = TRUE, probability = FALSE) > table(pred,y) y pred ctl nuc ctl 82 3 nuc 5 84 > pred 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .... nuc nuc nuc nuc nuc nuc nuc ctl .... And now, with probabities computation :

It's cool, it's exciting, and much thanks to Duncan. He announced RJava yesterday (or this morning?) on the R-devel list, and it's really worth it. http://www.omegahat.org/RSJava for more details. But it does mean that we can run Orca code directly within R, (without Thomas' socket connections) (and also means that we really need a "stop" button, since killing

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Do not allocate a vmcb_control_area and a vmcb_save_area on the stack, as these structures will become larger with future extenstions of SVM and thus the svm_set_nested_state() function will become a too large stack frame. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 47

This patch introduces to a new tun/tap specific msg_control: #define TUN_MSG_UBUF 1 #define TUN_MSG_PTR 2 struct tun_msg_ctl { int type; void *ptr; }; This allows us to pass different kinds of msg_control through sendmsg(). The first supported type is ubuf (TUN_MSG_UBUF) which will be used by the existed vhost_net zerocopy code. The second is XDP buff, which allows vhost_net to

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:23PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch introduces to a new tun/tap specific msg_control: > > #define TUN_MSG_UBUF 1 > #define TUN_MSG_PTR 2 > struct tun_msg_ctl { > int type; > void *ptr; > }; > > This allows us to pass different kinds of msg_control through > sendmsg(). The first supported type is ubuf

This patch implements XDP batching for vhost_net with tun. This is done by batching XDP buffs in vhost and submit them when: - vhost_net can not build XDP buff (mostly because of the size of packet) - #batched exceeds the limitation (VHOST_NET_RX_BATCH). - tun accept a batch of XDP buff through msg_control and process them in a batch With this tun XDP can benefit from e.g batch transmission

I've tried to compile rate-engine 0.5.2 on Fedora Core 1, Redhat 9 and OpenNA Linux 1.0 and all give me an "Error 1" after typing "make" but with no real reason given. Just a few standard/non-critical warning messages, and then suddenly "Error 1" Anybody successfully compile Rate Engine? The least cost routing module for Asterisk? Thanks in advance.