similar to: using multiple protocol:address:port at the same time

quoted from http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/redirect-gateway/ "In fact, one does not have to set the VPN_GATEWAY variable at all. In switch mode, the gateway routes are necessary" i don't get it. it's is too short to understand. is VPN_GATEWAY set by tinc in switch mode? and why is "In switch mode, the gateway routes are necessary" mentioned here suddenly? afaik,

I have been delighted by tinc. Building a mesh like I need would have been horrible in OpenVPN. tinc makes it easy. I decided to share a workaround for a problem that's been vexing me. Either I'm being dumb (and can do this better with a hint) or this is something others might need. I've been moving a bunch of services from our university to Amazon (EC2). To do this, I bring

pc1(LANa) ----poor connection ----> VPS <--------- PC2(LANb) pc1 and pc2 used to connected directly with tinc, since pc1 used to have WAN IP(pppoe), but the pppoe IP is not WAN IP anymore (ISP changed to let all ADSL user in a LAN). if I let the two pc connect to a VPS with tinc, can later connections between pc1 and pc2 be directly ? for example, ssh from pc1 to pc2 but not proxyed by

Howdy, I tried tackling this on irc with Ivo, but I suspect that irc may really not be the best medium for technical discussions, so I'll reprise it here. I am trying to duplicate the "tinc from behind a masquerading firewall" example from the tinc web site: (home) <--> (masquerading firewall) <--> (office) 192.168.1.21 192.168.1.1/1.2.3.4

I noticed a large performance boost both on bare metal and in vps instances by turning on kernel routing in the tinc config, and using full host declerations for routs rather than dumping things to the tun interface ambiguously. "Forwarding = kernel" ip route add 1.2.3.4 via 4.3.2.1 dev tun -instead of- ip route add 1.2.3.4 dev tun On May 17, 2017 3:10 PM, "Niklas Hambüchen"

Hallo, Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) waehring (1.1) | +-------------------+--------------+ | | | vpnhub1 (1.1) igor (1.1) turing (1.0) | | | +-------------------+--------------+ | tokamak Whenever another node outside of the graph connects to vpnhub or igor

Hi Graham Can you perhaps share with me the mr-mips metarouter image you are using? Regards Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at hotmail.com> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Graham Cobb <g+tinc at cobb.uk.net> wrote: > On 19/01/16 03:57, Yazeed Fataar wrote: > > Hi Marek > > > > I managed to setup everything in openwrt. However I am getting errors > > when

On Fri, 15 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:26:46PM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > Another strange and difficult to understand thing - seems like all the > > easy bugs in 1.1 are gone ;) > [...] > > Got ADD_EDGE from aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) for haegar_tokamak > > -> igor which does not match existing entry (Local

> - Indirectdata finally REALLY REALLY works now! > - More precise debug messages Hmmm ... I can't prove that using the CVS code I checked out this morning. Everything works like yesterday: I can ping the peer but I canot go beyond: *** SERVER *** Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]: tincd 1.0pre3 (Jun 27 2000 08:53:56) startin g, debug level 4 Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]:

Hi, I configured 2 vpn's between 2 servers. When starting the tinc on each server. De 2 vpns's look like 1 vpn. Can tinc be configure for multiple vpn's between 2 hosts or more. Lets say there are 3 servers A, B and C. I want a tinc vpn between host A en host B. And a second vpn between host B en C without is becoming one vpn. And for example a third vpn between host A en host

Hi folks, Sorry to trouble you all - I'm having some trouble getting tincd up and running - I suspect I'm having problems with subnets. Any help would relaly be appreciated! At the moment I'm trying to get two linux boxes, both of which are running as NAT routers for their respective networks to talk. My goal is to allow staff to connect to the corporate network from their laptops

Would it be possible to mix the router and switch mode in the same tinc network?  I’m running tinc for a couple of years now in switch mode. It works very well. I have a dozen of vm’s connected to a couple of VM’s on 2 physical nodes. Those VM’s on the physical nodes are connected via a 2nd interface to an openvswitch bridge on which those physical nodes provide the connection outside. As extra

I'm been experiencing a very very odd problem for the past several weeks and am throwing it out in case someone can shed some light on it for me. There is a single box on our tinc mesh which can be pinged from all hosts, but cannot ping any. It is not limited to ping, the box cannot communicate over tinc. tinc is running in router mode for this mesh. ~30 other nodes function normally,

Hi, I have a host name defined in /etc/hosts (say "1.2.3.4 host1") that resolves via that but not via DNS; consequently pinging and netcatting to it works fine. When I try to use that in a tinc host definition like "Address = host1", tinc 1.1 tells me Error looking up host1 port 655: Name or service not known Why is that? Does getaddrinfo() tinc uses not consider

Something tells me this was covered recently, but i didn't find it again in gmail. The nodes see each other but if i have something misconfigured that is decreasing my speed. All my nodes are behind NATs. i have a remote node that connects to a central node via port forwarding from public port 7777 to hp821 running on port 655. remoteNode ----> public ip 1.2.3.4:7777 ---->

Hi, I'm a beginner on VPN's World. I think TINC is a solution for me. I want to connect thru Internet 2 different locations, both networks are Windows based. I downloaded TINC Installer for Windows and followed Installation Guide step by step, everything is ok but when I tried to run TINC Deamon a message it's displayed said: "The services has started and finished immediately

Was running 1.0pre2 just fine, but had to move machines, so I figgured I'd give 1.0pre3 a try. After getting everything to build and figguring out the new config files, here's where I'm stuck. Start the server process (remote machine). Start the client process (local machine). In remote machine, the following shows up in syslog: tinc[2659]: Got SEGV signal In local machine, the

Hi all, Has there been any progress made on using UDP, but being a NAT? To avoid the Received UDP packet from unknown source 1.2.3.4 messages? I'm using TCP as a workaround for now. Thanks. David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20140424/6114ed74/attachment.html>

Hi, I'd like to establish multiple direct connections between 2 hosts. As far as I can see, tinc doesn't allow this (when a new connection come, the old one is closed). Is seach features maybe integrated to tinc ? What is the status of 2.0 svn branch ? Thx. Manuel

On Sat, 16 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:09:52AM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > This change is not so good: > > > > Connection with aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) activated > > Error while translating addresses: ai_family not supported > > > > (And then the tinc process exists) > > Hm, I couldn't reproduce