similar to: tinc Digest, Vol 90, Issue 18

Dear C?dric, If I am using windows version of tinc, how can I check the connection list? Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org [mailto:tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org] On Behalf Of tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:00 PM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: tinc Digest, Vol 90, Issue 17 Send tinc mailing list submissions to tinc at

Ah, very good then. There does seem to be some changes in zip compression behavior with the new lib & a build of OptiPNG I use, so I'm curious how it'd affect tinc traffic on compressed links. Then again I use LZO on my links, so I don't expect to see any changes for myself. -----Original Message----- From: tinc-devel-request at tinc-vpn.org To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org

Lastest Modifications: HOST A: Removed 2 route add as you suggested, and it's still working. HOST B: This host has a openwrt as gateway and I added few days ago as you suggested on freenode and this is HOST B Gateway route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 10 0

Can i know where can i get into the digest?Got any links?Can sir recommend some journal or related works for me to refer?Thanks. tinc-devel-request@tinc-vpn.org wrote: Send tinc-devel mailing list submissions to tinc-devel@tinc-vpn.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://brouwer.uvt.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or

ofcourse there is no freepbx, and there is no difference between the version of asterisk , ATM we are using asterisk 1.6.2.19 , i've also tried it on asterisk 1.10 , which resulted in the same way , does anyone have any ideas , why is it happening like this . thank you. On 9 January 2012 14:30, <tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > Send tinc mailing list submissions to >

Thanks Guus. Appreciate the help. What's the purpose of SUBNET msg? Is it even useful in switch mode? I tweaked the code to disable SUBNET msg, because I thought they weren't useful when it comes to switch mode. Which caused the UDP connection got blocked apparently. If I re-enable SUBNET msg, the udp connection starts to work fine. I don't see any forwarding traffic any more. On

i need forwarding off , cause i need a central node , which is connected directly to all the network , directly , so it can usually upload content directly , without slowing down other nodes in the network , i also don't want it to act as a forwarder , since ,it only has 2mbps of bandwidth , and i don't want it for that purpose , is there any other way to fix this problem ? On 16 March

actually at the moment the setup is like this , it has the same ip address , both lan and tinc , but iax doesn't work at all , moreover , i want to be able to make an IAX trunk to the rest of the machines from different networks together . what happens is that , asterisk says that the request is sent , but nothing will be received . if you want i can try to make a tcpdump tomorrow , and send

Hello Maximilian, I think may be cause by MTU proble if you have many peer. you can run tincd with -d 5 or tincd -n "yournetname" -k INT , check the log file to see what happen. if so, you can use my patch to fix this. thanks PHB On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 7:00 PM <tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > Send tinc mailing list submissions to > tinc at tinc-vpn.org

Hi, Thank you Guus, I think the /16 solution is the easier to apply so I modified my tinc-up in host A to be like #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 a route -a from HOST A shows: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 178.62.128.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.129.0.0

El 12 de febrero de 2016 16:51:59 CET, Eric Yau <ericyaukhy at hotmail.com> escribi?: >Hi All, > > > >I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home >network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration >for >your reference. > > > >Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1, >10.0.0.1)

Thanks for replying so quickly Guus. I will try increasing the re-keying time to 86400, and am now running the servers in debug 5 mode logging to a file, so will get all output. Its interesting what you say about UDP being given lower priority, the two end points of this VPN are actually within the same data center, but are being routed within the DC's core routers (because its going

Hi Lars, Once I modify the firewall FORWARD rule to ACCEPT. I can ping and access my company PC at home. All traffic can pass through that. But I think it is not a good practice to change the FORWARD rule to ACCEPT. Any idea to check and just allow the tinc VPN traffic only? Instead of allow everything pass through the FORWARD rule. Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: Lars Kruse

Updated IPv6 tutorial for your consideration: I abandoned use of the one described on the tinc site some years back. http://unquietwiki.com/ipv6/tinc_quagga_ipv6.html -----Original Message----- From: tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:00:02 +0100 Subject: tinc Digest, Vol 87, Issue 6 Send tinc mailing list submissions to tinc at

Hello, I am using the latest Tinc 1.1 from git (tinc version 1.1pre14-17-g2784a17 (built Jul 14 2016 14:18:09, protocol 17.7) on a CentOS 7.2 64bit with both test servers set it FIPS mode (cat /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled to verify or add fips=1 to your grub2 command line ). We need our test servers running in FIPS mode due to a minimum requirement for our project. OpenSSL in CentOS/RHEL has

Dear Lance, It is not work. Any idea? Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: Lance Fredrickson [mailto:lancethepants at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:53 AM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: Tinc Router Mode - PING RESULT is destination host unreachable On 2/16/2016 9:04 AM, Eric Yau wrote: > Hi Lars, > > Once I modify the firewall FORWARD rule to

Hallo, A question about the tinc Cipher= and Digest= values: Do these values absolutely need to be identical on both "sides" for the connection to work? Or does it only affect the outgoing side of the packets but not the receive? For example three nodes, two with ConnectTo= to Hub H, and on host A I have a hosts/H and hosts/B entry with: Cipher=blowfish Digest=sha1 But on host B

Something to add. When this happened, it looks like tinc shutdown gracefully(not seg fault ..), because I can tell tinc-down script got implemented. Heng On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:00 AM, <tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > Send tinc mailing list submissions to > tinc at tinc-vpn.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Thanks for the reply. I am running tinc (1.0.24) in an embedded linux environment, with a pretty old kernel (2.6). I have let tinc run for almost 24 hours with internet and can't reproduce the issue. Heng On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:00 AM, <tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > Send tinc mailing list submissions to > tinc at tinc-vpn.org > > To subscribe or

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When