Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[Bug 748] New: Range check for ulog-cprange is wrong"
2014 May 07
1
[Bug 921] New: log, ulog and nflog: command-line parameters are not supported
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921
Summary: log, ulog and nflog: command-line parameters are not
supported
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: nft
AssignedTo: pablo at
2012 May 26
0
[ANNOUNCE] iptables 1.4.14 release
Hi!
The Netfilter project proudly presents:
iptables 1.4.14
This release several bugfixes and support for the new cttimeout
infrastructure. This allows you to attach specific timeout policies to
flow via iptables CT target.
The following example shows the usage of this new infrastructure in a
couple of steps:
1) Create a timeout policy with name `custom-tcp-policy1':
nfct
2011 Oct 19
0
[Bug 758] New: Retry iptables command on transient failure
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758
Summary: Retry iptables command on transient failure
Product: iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: iptables
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
2004 Jul 23
4
shorewall 2.0.3a, (ULOG) doesn''t log anything
Dear all:
Im using shorewall 2.0.3a (debian) w/ ULOG. shorewall starts ok, and the
firewall is running, but nothing is printed on the logs.
I try, for example, to do a connection to a port that is opened on the
server but closed by the FW and I get a connection refused. If I stop
the firewall, this port is accesible from the outside.
I think I''ve followed all the steps on
2009 Aug 25
1
[PATCH] A default log level of ULOG is ignored by the shorewall-perl compiler (but not by shorewall-shell)
Hello,
I tried Shorewall for the first time today. I am currently using an up-to-date
installation of Debian Sid, which has shorewall 4.2.10, shorewall-shell 4.2.10
and shorewall-perl 4.2.10.1.
I noticed that even though I had the following /etc/shorewall/policy file,
iptables would still show LOG rules at the end of the INPUT and OUTPUT chains
instead of ULOG rules. (Other logging related rules
2003 Mar 07
0
[Bug 62] New: I patched the iptables-restore and liblptulog for string included "," "
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62
Summary: I patched the iptables-restore and liblptulog for string
included "," "
Product: iptables userspace
Version: 1.2.7a
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
2002 Mar 17
2
ulog support in shorewall?
Hi,
I''ve just recently switched off my (lame) hardware firewall onto an
old box running linux 2.4.18, iptables 1.2.6 and shorewall 1.2.9. I''m
kinda new to linux firewalling myself but so far Shorewall has taken
much work from me.
While reading myself into iptables I saw that just recently something
called ULOG (userspace logging) has been implemented in newer kernels
and
2002 Jan 31
0
[ANNOUNCE] problems with recent ULOG patch and old ulogd
--/aVve/J9H4Wl5yVO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Everybody!
I had to change the ulog.patch in recent patch-o-matic to use a different
netlink family (it's now 5 instead of 4).
This means, you will have to recompile your ulogd or any other application
in order to make it work.
That's also why I have
2005 Jan 07
5
ULOG weirdness with 2.0.10
I''m noticing some weirdness in my ulog files with version 2.0.10. Here
is a portion of the log:
Jan 7 11:01:37 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:0a:95:b2:11:4c:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.100
DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=97 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=44155 CE PROTO=UDP
SPT=631 DPT=631 LEN=77
Jan 7 11:01:39 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT=
2014 Nov 07
7
[Bug 986] New: ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986
Bug ID: 986
Summary: ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0
due to ULOG target removal
Product: ulogd
Version: SVN (please provide timestamp)
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Gentoo
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority:
2004 Aug 08
1
using ULOG
hi,
if i would like to use ulog (in order to split netfilter messages from
other kernel messages), than i have to set all loglevel to ULOG? and
then is there any way to define diferent loglevel for eg. maclist?
thanks in advance.
yours.
ps. it''s a bit confusing that all loglevel parameter name is LOG_LEVEL
except BLACKLIST_LOGLEVEL:-(
--
Levente
2002 Dec 13
0
ULOG Support now in CVS
Anywhere that a syslog level can appear, you can now specify ULOG (must be
upper case) and logging will occur to the ulog target. You can download
ulogd from http://www.gnumonks.org/projects/ulogd.
Only the ''firewall'' file is required. None of the comments in the other
config files are updated yet but I''m working on it.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables
2003 Jul 29
1
Web Interface to browse ULOG messages real time
Going deeper on last post "[Shorewall-users] logging", I found a very nice
package that handles ULOG messages in a web interface, where you can browse
the events from a MySql database produced by ULOGD. Real time.
The name is: ULOGD-PHP
From the site:
-------------------------------------------
ulogd-php is able to :
show the last hosts that broke packets on your firewall.
show the
2013 Sep 20
0
logging with ULOG and SYSLOG
Hi,
I have a legal requirement to log all connections and I will use ULOG
to log all ACCEPTED conenctions.
However it is so much easier to look at text log file compared to
binary log file. So I would like to log DROPPED/REJECTED packets with
SYSLOG for rule testing/debuging purposes.
Is it possible to use both ULOG for ACCEPTED packets and SYSLOG for
DROPPED packets?
Thank you for your help.
2009 Jul 10
1
[Bug 600] New: ULOG target does not support --log-uid
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600
Summary: ULOG target does not support --log-uid
Product: iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: iptables
AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org
ReportedBy: dom at
2006 Mar 22
0
[ulog 1.24] wrong version and no log in ulogd.log
hi.
ulogd.c use 1.23 as its version while it is shipped with ulog 1.24
moreover ulogd does not log anymore in ulogd.log like ulogd 1.23 did
2005 May 31
0
ULOG logging may fail on some ulogd/logrotate configurations
FYI.
I have not been able to determine 100% that logrotate does this, but ulogd
appears to stop logging whenever logrotate runs. So far, the only obvious
commonality that I see is that logrotate ran and that the
/var/log/ulogd/ulogd.syslogemu is completely empty until I restart ulogd.
I have proven that the logging is broken by manually performing a network
operation that Shorewall normally
2012 Dec 17
31
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bug tracking system (http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW or REOPENED state, and have not been
touched in 7 days or more.
You need to take a look at them, and decide on an initial action.
Generally, this means one of three things:
(1) You
2013 Nov 08
4
[Bug 871] New: Running two instances of ulog causes abort in libnfnetlink
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=871
Summary: Running two instances of ulog causes abort in
libnfnetlink
Product: ulogd
Version: SVN (please provide timestamp)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: ulogd
AssignedTo:
2012 Nov 17
29
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bug tracking system (http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW or REOPENED state, and have not been
touched in 7 days or more.
You need to take a look at them, and decide on an initial action.
Generally, this means one of three things:
(1) You