similar to: [Bug 82] iptables doesn't compile if no optimization flags are set

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82 Summary: iptables doesn't compile if no optimization flags are set Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: other OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-30 21:18 ------- First of all: You didn't even specify the particular kernel version you are running, not even mentioning which versions of which patches you are using (if any). Secondly, I don't see anything strange in this setup. DNAT with FTP sessions

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:51 MET ------- In the DCC Specifcication

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bowles@ambisys.com Component|unknown |ip_tables (kernel) OS/Version|other

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571 Summary: Compile of iptables 1.4.2 with testing Linux kernel 2.6.29-rc2 fails - workaround included Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From aliz@gentoo.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628 Summary: Bugzilla-Bug: "Bugzilla has suffered an internal error." Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568 Summary: iptables-save saves option hashlimit-htable-gcinterval with error Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables-save AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=505 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |pablo@netfilter.org Version|CVS (please indicate |1.1.2 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=447 Bug 447 depends on bug 440, which changed state. Bug 440 Summary: Space in filename causes Forged DCC command from x.x.x.x: 0.0.0.0:0 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 What |Old Value |New Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570 Summary: iptables save saves broken rules for -m owner Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: iptables-save AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575 Summary: iptables-save didn't flush output buffers before fork Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables-save AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81 Summary: iptables-save doesn't work with MAC Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: All URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10736 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-04 18:46 ------- is this bug (esp. the dscp-issue) still present with current CVS? I can't even reproduce the problem anymore... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78 ------- Additional Comments From tools@die.net 2003-04-17 15:47 ------- Showing any ports open that are sent to it is the normal function of TARPIT target. The psd match will start routing all ports to it after it decides that an IP is portscanning, so this is the expected behavior. That being said, the psd match won't

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=468 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-04-11 03:11 MET ------- Patches

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=467 ------- Additional Comments From mvolaski@aecom.yu.edu 2006-04-14 01:35 MET ------- Examples of rules that give the error are 1) iptables -A INPUT -i bond0 -s 129.98.90.0/24 -p tcp --dport 548 -j ACCEPT 2) iptables -A INPUT -i bond0 -s 129.98.90.101/32 -p tcp --dport 497 -j ACCEPT 3) iptables -A INPUT -i bond0 -s 129.98.90.227/32